{"id":{"repo_id":"penn","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.upenn.edu:20.500.14332/62315"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/penn/oai:repository.upenn.edu:20.500.14332/62315","repository":{"repo_id":"penn","name":"University of Pennsylvania","base_url":"https://repository.upenn.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"White Power and Profit in New England School Desegregation, 1964–1972","abstract":"Until 1963, despite Brown v. Board and the court-ordered and government-incentivized desegregation that followed, most schools in New England continued to exclude nonwhite children systematically. I argue that this began to change when desegregation became profitable for powerful white New Englanders. Starting with the nation’s most elite independent schools and later extending to public schools in New England’s suburbs, I demonstrate that the desegregation movement gained momentum when it converged with white New Englanders’ economic and political interests. I use historical sociological methods and draw on more than 1,000 archival sources to challenge the dominant narrative portraying segregation as a Southern issue and desegregation as inherently racially progressive. I introduce the concept of “extractive inclusion” to describe how Black and Indigenous children were admitted into institutions that had previously excluded them—but only under conditions that enabled white institutional actors to extract capital from their inclusion.","abstract_html":"Until 1963, despite Brown v. Board and the court-ordered and government-incentivized desegregation that followed, most schools in New England continued to exclude nonwhite children systematically. I argue that this began to change when desegregation became profitable for powerful white New Englanders. Starting with the nation’s most elite independent schools and later extending to public schools in New England’s suburbs, I demonstrate that the desegregation movement gained momentum when it converged with white New Englanders’ economic and political interests. I use historical sociological methods and draw on more than 1,000 archival sources to challenge the dominant narrative portraying segregation as a Southern issue and desegregation as inherently racially progressive. I introduce the concept of “extractive inclusion” to describe how Black and Indigenous children were admitted into institutions that had previously excluded them—but only under conditions that enabled white institutional actors to extract capital from their inclusion.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cartwright, Ashleigh, Imani"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Charles, Camille, Z."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025","date_published":"2025","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:46:55Z","subjects":["Sociology","American Languages, Literatures, and Cultures","Education"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/62315","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Charles, Camille, Z."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cartwright, Ashleigh, Imani"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-01-29T17:19:37Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-01-29T17:19:37Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation/Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Sociology","American Languages, Literatures, and Cultures","Education"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/62315"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["2025"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Until 1963, despite Brown v. Board and the court-ordered and government-incentivized desegregation that followed, most schools in New England continued to exclude nonwhite children systematically. I argue that this began to change when desegregation became profitable for powerful white New Englanders. Starting with the nation’s most elite independent schools and later extending to public schools in New England’s suburbs, I demonstrate that the desegregation movement gained momentum when it converged with white New Englanders’ economic and political interests. I use historical sociological methods and draw on more than 1,000 archival sources to challenge the dominant narrative portraying segregation as a Southern issue and desegregation as inherently racially progressive. I introduce the concept of “extractive inclusion” to describe how Black and Indigenous children were admitted into institutions that had previously excluded them—but only under conditions that enabled white institutional actors to extract capital from their inclusion."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["White Power and Profit in New England School Desegregation, 1964–1972"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Charles, Camille, Z."],"dc:creator":["Cartwright, Ashleigh, Imani"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-01-29T17:19:37Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-01-29T17:19:37Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2025"],"dc:description":["2025"],"dc:description.abstract":["Until 1963, despite Brown v. Board and the court-ordered and government-incentivized desegregation that followed, most schools in New England continued to exclude nonwhite children systematically. I argue that this began to change when desegregation became profitable for powerful white New Englanders. Starting with the nation’s most elite independent schools and later extending to public schools in New England’s suburbs, I demonstrate that the desegregation movement gained momentum when it converged with white New Englanders’ economic and political interests. I use historical sociological methods and draw on more than 1,000 archival sources to challenge the dominant narrative portraying segregation as a Southern issue and desegregation as inherently racially progressive. I introduce the concept of “extractive inclusion” to describe how Black and Indigenous children were admitted into institutions that had previously excluded them—but only under conditions that enabled white institutional actors to extract capital from their inclusion."],"dc:description.degree":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/62315"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:subject":["Sociology","American Languages, Literatures, and Cultures","Education"],"dc:title":["White Power and Profit in New England School Desegregation, 1964–1972"],"dc:type":["Dissertation/Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:46:55Z"}