Back to results

Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa

Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Clinical Practice

Abstract

dc:description

Shared decision making (SDM) is rarely used in pediatric clinical practice. The purpose of this dissertation was to explore factors influencing SDM implementation in pediatric clinical practice. We conducted three studies that were guided by the Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU): Study 1 was a systematic review using Cochrane methods and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to determine pediatric SDM barriers and facilitators from multiple perspectives. Eighty studies, of low to high quality, were included. At each OMRU level, frequently cited barriers were: option features (decision), poor quality information (innovation), emotional state (adopter), power relations (relational), and insufficient time (environment). Frequently cited facilitators were: lower stake decisions (decision), agreement with SDM (adopter), high quality information (innovation), trust and respect (relational), and SDM tools/resources (environment). Across participant types, frequently cited barriers were: insufficient time (healthcare providers (HCP)), option features (parents), power imbalances (children), and HCPs’ SDM skills (observers). Frequently cited facilitators were: good quality information (HCPs) and agreement with SDM (parents/children). Study 2 was a post-test design that evaluated SDM knowledge and acceptability of learners who completed the Ottawa Decision Support Tutorial (ODST). Most learners were HCPs (62%). Overall, ODST learners had a median knowledge test score of 8/10 (IQR = 7-9; n=6604) and 90% reported good or excellent impressions (n=4276) after completing the tutorial. Few learners suggested improvements. Study 3 used mixed methods to evaluate pediatric HCPs’ perceived SDM barriers and facilitators after training (ODST plus workshop). Participants completed a SDM barrier survey (n=60; 88% response rate) and semi-structured interview (n=11). Their intention to use SDM was high (mean score = 5.6/7, SD=0.8). However, 90% of respondents reported minimal SDM use after training. Main barriers were lack of buy-in (adopter level) and time constraints (environmental level). Healthcare providers wanted a team-based approach to SDM training (training level). Adopters face numerous and diverse barriers to SDM use, before and after SDM training. Pediatric HCPs who completed the ODST were knowledgeable about SDM. Despite positive intentions, training alone was insufficient to achieve routine SDM use. These findings can inform intervention development to promote SDM implementation in pediatric clinical practice.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
Year dc:date
2018

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Boland, Laura
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Stacey, C. Dawn

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Rights

Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/38181

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Ottawa
Base URL
ruor.uottawa.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Boland, Laura. Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Clinical Practice. Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/38181