{"id":{"repo_id":"oregon","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/31699"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/oregon/oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/31699","repository":{"repo_id":"oregon","name":"University of Oregon","base_url":"https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Laying the Groundwork for Public Participation in Cougar Mountain: A Case Study of Southwestern Oregon","abstract":"Oregon's cougar (Puma concolor) population is the subject of ongoing statewide controversy. Human dimensions of wildlife research suggests that wildlife conflicts are best addressed by incorporating public involvement strategies into wildlife management. This study used traditional survey research to lay the groundwork for more extensive public involvement in cougar management. Questionnaires were mailed to 800 randomly-selected households in southwestern Oregon. The adjusted response rate was 58% (N = 360). The majority of respondents believed that major decisions about cougar management should be made by experts and citizens together. Respondents who had greater prior experience with cougars, higher concern regarding cougars as a potential threat to people, pets, or livestock, or who did not trust wildlife managers to make the best possible decisions were more likely to take part in a public involvement process. The survey results are discussed in terms of their implications for designing inclusive and effective public participation.","abstract_html":"Oregon's cougar (Puma concolor) population is the subject of ongoing statewide controversy. Human dimensions of wildlife research suggests that wildlife conflicts are best addressed by incorporating public involvement strategies into wildlife management. This study used traditional survey research to lay the groundwork for more extensive public involvement in cougar management. Questionnaires were mailed to 800 randomly-selected households in southwestern Oregon. The adjusted response rate was 58% (N = 360). The majority of respondents believed that major decisions about cougar management should be made by experts and citizens together. Respondents who had greater prior experience with cougars, higher concern regarding cougars as a potential threat to people, pets, or livestock, or who did not trust wildlife managers to make the best possible decisions were more likely to take part in a public involvement process. The survey results are discussed in terms of their implications for designing inclusive and effective public participation.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Chinitz, Amy E."],"institution":"University of Oregon","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Johnson, Bart R."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2002,"date_issued":"2002-12","date_published":"2002-12","updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:47:20Z","subjects":["Cougar","Wildlife research","Policy-making","Public participation","Oregon cougar population"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1794/31699","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"source_record":{"url":"https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=dim&identifier=oai%3Ascholarsbank.uoregon.edu%3A1794%2F31699","prefix":"dim"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Johnson, Bart R."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Chinitz, Amy E."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-09-04T20:53:33Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2002-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Oregon"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis / Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Cougar","Wildlife research","Policy-making","Public participation","Oregon cougar population"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1794/31699"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["171 pages"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Oregon's cougar (Puma concolor) population is the subject of ongoing statewide controversy. Human dimensions of wildlife research suggests that wildlife conflicts are best addressed by incorporating public involvement strategies into wildlife management. This study used traditional survey research to lay the groundwork for more extensive public involvement in cougar management. Questionnaires were mailed to 800 randomly-selected households in southwestern Oregon. The adjusted response rate was 58% (N = 360). The majority of respondents believed that major decisions about cougar management should be made by experts and citizens together. Respondents who had greater prior experience with cougars, higher concern regarding cougars as a potential threat to people, pets, or livestock, or who did not trust wildlife managers to make the best possible decisions were more likely to take part in a public involvement process. The survey results are discussed in terms of their implications for designing inclusive and effective public participation."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Laying the Groundwork for Public Participation in Cougar Mountain: A Case Study of Southwestern Oregon"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Johnson, Bart R."],"dc:creator":["Chinitz, Amy E."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-09-04T20:53:33Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2002-12"],"dc:description":["171 pages"],"dc:description.abstract":["Oregon's cougar (Puma concolor) population is the subject of ongoing statewide controversy. Human dimensions of wildlife research suggests that wildlife conflicts are best addressed by incorporating public involvement strategies into wildlife management. This study used traditional survey research to lay the groundwork for more extensive public involvement in cougar management. Questionnaires were mailed to 800 randomly-selected households in southwestern Oregon. The adjusted response rate was 58% (N = 360). The majority of respondents believed that major decisions about cougar management should be made by experts and citizens together. Respondents who had greater prior experience with cougars, higher concern regarding cougars as a potential threat to people, pets, or livestock, or who did not trust wildlife managers to make the best possible decisions were more likely to take part in a public involvement process. The survey results are discussed in terms of their implications for designing inclusive and effective public participation."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1794/31699"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["University of Oregon"],"dc:rights":["Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US"],"dc:subject":["Cougar","Wildlife research","Policy-making","Public participation","Oregon cougar population"],"dc:title":["Laying the Groundwork for Public Participation in Cougar Mountain: A Case Study of Southwestern Oregon"],"dc:type":["Thesis / Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:47:20Z"}