{"id":{"repo_id":"oregon","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/25230"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/oregon/oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/25230","repository":{"repo_id":"oregon","name":"University of Oregon","base_url":"https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Whose Voice is it Anyway? The Politics of Narrative Stylistics in Arthur Schnitzler’s Fräulein Else & Han Kang’s The Vegetarian","abstract":"Arthur Schnitzler’s novella Fräulein Else has often been juxtaposed with Freud’s Bruchstücke einer Hysterie-Analyse, and both can be read as an endeavour to ‘give voice’ to the hysteric through representation. This representation, however, depends on someone speaking for someone else, and thus, the ‘hysteric’ herself has no voice of her own. Juxtaposing this with Han Kang’s novel The Vegetarian helps shed light on a different way of communication and understanding, one that does not rely on someone speaking for someone else but allows for the silence of the silenced to be understood on their own term. I draw on Mieke Bal’s narratology and Spivak’s “Can the Subaltern speak?” in order to analyse and describe how representation of the ‘other’ and the possibility of communication with the ‘other’ is presented differently in these three texts and what we can learn from them.","abstract_html":"Arthur Schnitzler’s novella Fräulein Else has often been juxtaposed with Freud’s Bruchstücke einer Hysterie-Analyse, and both can be read as an endeavour to ‘give voice’ to the hysteric through representation. This representation, however, depends on someone speaking for someone else, and thus, the ‘hysteric’ herself has no voice of her own. Juxtaposing this with Han Kang’s novel The Vegetarian helps shed light on a different way of communication and understanding, one that does not rely on someone speaking for someone else but allows for the silence of the silenced to be understood on their own term. I draw on Mieke Bal’s narratology and Spivak’s “Can the Subaltern speak?” in order to analyse and describe how representation of the ‘other’ and the possibility of communication with the ‘other’ is presented differently in these three texts and what we can learn from them.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Zabel, Verena"],"institution":"University of Oregon","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Department of German and Scandinavian","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Librett, Jeffrey"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-02-27","date_published":"2020-02-27","updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:47:18Z","subjects":["Arthur Schnitzler","communication","Han Kang","Sigmund Freud","silence","Spivak"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["All Rights Reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1794/25230","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"source_record":{"url":"https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=dim&identifier=oai%3Ascholarsbank.uoregon.edu%3A1794%2F25230","prefix":"dim"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Librett, Jeffrey"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Zabel, Verena"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-02-27T22:31:24Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-02-27T22:31:24Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2020-02-27"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Oregon"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Department of German and Scandinavian"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Oregon"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Arthur Schnitzler","communication","Han Kang","Sigmund Freud","silence","Spivak"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["All Rights Reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1794/25230"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Arthur Schnitzler’s novella Fräulein Else has often been juxtaposed with Freud’s Bruchstücke einer Hysterie-Analyse, and both can be read as an endeavour to ‘give voice’ to the hysteric through representation. This representation, however, depends on someone speaking for someone else, and thus, the ‘hysteric’ herself has no voice of her own. Juxtaposing this with Han Kang’s novel The Vegetarian helps shed light on a different way of communication and understanding, one that does not rely on someone speaking for someone else but allows for the silence of the silenced to be understood on their own term. I draw on Mieke Bal’s narratology and Spivak’s “Can the Subaltern speak?” in order to analyse and describe how representation of the ‘other’ and the possibility of communication with the ‘other’ is presented differently in these three texts and what we can learn from them."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Whose Voice is it Anyway? The Politics of Narrative Stylistics in Arthur Schnitzler’s Fräulein Else & Han Kang’s The Vegetarian"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Librett, Jeffrey"],"dc:creator":["Zabel, Verena"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-02-27T22:31:24Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-02-27T22:31:24Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2020-02-27"],"dc:description.abstract":["Arthur Schnitzler’s novella Fräulein Else has often been juxtaposed with Freud’s Bruchstücke einer Hysterie-Analyse, and both can be read as an endeavour to ‘give voice’ to the hysteric through representation. This representation, however, depends on someone speaking for someone else, and thus, the ‘hysteric’ herself has no voice of her own. Juxtaposing this with Han Kang’s novel The Vegetarian helps shed light on a different way of communication and understanding, one that does not rely on someone speaking for someone else but allows for the silence of the silenced to be understood on their own term. I draw on Mieke Bal’s narratology and Spivak’s “Can the Subaltern speak?” in order to analyse and describe how representation of the ‘other’ and the possibility of communication with the ‘other’ is presented differently in these three texts and what we can learn from them."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1794/25230"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["University of Oregon"],"dc:rights":["All Rights Reserved."],"dc:subject":["Arthur Schnitzler","communication","Han Kang","Sigmund Freud","silence","Spivak"],"dc:title":["Whose Voice is it Anyway? The Politics of Narrative Stylistics in Arthur Schnitzler’s Fräulein Else & Han Kang’s The Vegetarian"],"dc:type":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Department of German and Scandinavian"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Oregon"]},"updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:47:18Z"}