NGO-State Relations: Freedom House Status and Cooperation Versus Conflict

Based on previous academic literature, relationships between non-governmental organizations and governments are categorized as being either generally cooperative or generally conflictual, and vary state to state. Considering an assumption that more freedom afforded to a state provides space in society for a more vibrant third sector, it seems intuitive that states with more freedom will experience more cooperative relationships with the NGO sector than states with less. However, six case studies illustrate that this may not always be a correct assumption. To test this hypothesis, Freedom House statuses between 1991 and 2011 are averaged to provide an overall status of Free (Bolivia and India), Partly Free (Ethiopia and Sierra Leone), or Not Free (Azerbaijan and Vietnam) for these cases studies. Rather than relying on a state’s Freedom House status to forecast this relationship, this study finds that leadership policies and international influence also may impact the legal environment for NGOs.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Arts (MA)

Level thesis:degree_level

masters

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

International and Comparative Politics

Grantor dc:publisher

Wright State University

Year dc:date

2012

Author dc:creator

• Schroeder, Jacquelyn Ann

Contributors dc:contributor

• Luehrmann, Laura

• Political Science
• non-governmental organizations
• Freedom House
• NGO laws
• cooperation
• conflict
• Bolivia
• India
• Ethiopia
• Sierra Leone
• Azerbaijan
• Vietnam

Statement dc:rights

• unrestricted
• This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws.

Language dc:language

English

Repository record dc:identifier

http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1358101658

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:wright1358101658