{"id":{"repo_id":"ohiolink","oai_identifier":"oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:toledo1353085450"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ohiolink/oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:toledo1353085450","repository":{"repo_id":"ohiolink","name":"OhioLINK","base_url":"https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/oai/oai"},"display":{"title":"Development of a Method to Compare Storm Water Best Management Practices at The University of Toledo","abstract":"Storm water runoff has become a concern in urban environments. Urban environments have a very large percentage of impermeable area, creating large amounts of surface runoff. This surface runoff carries contaminants (nutrients, sediments, pathogens, oils and greases) into storm water collection systems, which drain directly into natural waters. These contaminants degrade water quality, harming human health and aquatic life. In order to address these concerns, storm water best management practices (BMPs) have been developed to reduce flow rates and improve water quality. However, many sites that require the use of the BMPs have no means of deciding which BMP is the best fit for the site in question. To address this problem, a Storm Water BMP Model was developed to analyze three different BMPs (porous pavement, bioswales, and rain gardens) for effectiveness. A comparison is made using input parameters including water quality information and permeable/impermeable areas, and potential. BMPs are ranked based on flow quantity reduction, pollutant reduction, and payback period. The payback period includes capital costs associated with constructing the BMP as well as monetary values associated with environmental gains from implementing the BMP. This model provides the opportunity to see a side by side comparison of BMPs in a retrofit situation and to evaluate their implementation based on cost and performance.","abstract_html":"Storm water runoff has become a concern in urban environments. Urban environments have a very large percentage of impermeable area, creating large amounts of surface runoff. This surface runoff carries contaminants (nutrients, sediments, pathogens, oils and greases) into storm water collection systems, which drain directly into natural waters. These contaminants degrade water quality, harming human health and aquatic life. In order to address these concerns, storm water best management practices (BMPs) have been developed to reduce flow rates and improve water quality. However, many sites that require the use of the BMPs have no means of deciding which BMP is the best fit for the site in question. To address this problem, a Storm Water BMP Model was developed to analyze three different BMPs (porous pavement, bioswales, and rain gardens) for effectiveness. A comparison is made using input parameters including water quality information and permeable/impermeable areas, and potential. BMPs are ranked based on flow quantity reduction, pollutant reduction, and payback period. The payback period includes capital costs associated with constructing the BMP as well as monetary values associated with environmental gains from implementing the BMP. This model provides the opportunity to see a side by side comparison of BMPs in a retrofit situation and to evaluate their implementation based on cost and performance.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wancata, Christopher Michael"],"institution":"University of Toledo","degree_name":"Master of Science in Civil Engineering","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Civil Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Gruden, Cyndee"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012","date_published":"2012","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:36:23Z","subjects":["Civil Engineering","storm water","best management practices","comparison analysis"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1353085450","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Gruden, Cyndee"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wancata, Christopher Michael"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Toledo / OhioLINK"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science in Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Toledo"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Civil Engineering","storm water","best management practices","comparison analysis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1353085450"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Storm water runoff has become a concern in urban environments. Urban environments have a very large percentage of impermeable area, creating large amounts of surface runoff. This surface runoff carries contaminants (nutrients, sediments, pathogens, oils and greases) into storm water collection systems, which drain directly into natural waters. These contaminants degrade water quality, harming human health and aquatic life. In order to address these concerns, storm water best management practices (BMPs) have been developed to reduce flow rates and improve water quality. However, many sites that require the use of the BMPs have no means of deciding which BMP is the best fit for the site in question. To address this problem, a Storm Water BMP Model was developed to analyze three different BMPs (porous pavement, bioswales, and rain gardens) for effectiveness. A comparison is made using input parameters including water quality information and permeable/impermeable areas, and potential. BMPs are ranked based on flow quantity reduction, pollutant reduction, and payback period. The payback period includes capital costs associated with constructing the BMP as well as monetary values associated with environmental gains from implementing the BMP. This model provides the opportunity to see a side by side comparison of BMPs in a retrofit situation and to evaluate their implementation based on cost and performance."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf","p.97","3.37 MB"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Development of a Method to Compare Storm Water Best Management Practices at The University of Toledo"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Gruden, Cyndee"],"dc:creator":["Wancata, Christopher Michael"],"dc:date":["2012"],"dc:description":["Storm water runoff has become a concern in urban environments. Urban environments have a very large percentage of impermeable area, creating large amounts of surface runoff. This surface runoff carries contaminants (nutrients, sediments, pathogens, oils and greases) into storm water collection systems, which drain directly into natural waters. These contaminants degrade water quality, harming human health and aquatic life. In order to address these concerns, storm water best management practices (BMPs) have been developed to reduce flow rates and improve water quality. However, many sites that require the use of the BMPs have no means of deciding which BMP is the best fit for the site in question. To address this problem, a Storm Water BMP Model was developed to analyze three different BMPs (porous pavement, bioswales, and rain gardens) for effectiveness. A comparison is made using input parameters including water quality information and permeable/impermeable areas, and potential. BMPs are ranked based on flow quantity reduction, pollutant reduction, and payback period. The payback period includes capital costs associated with constructing the BMP as well as monetary values associated with environmental gains from implementing the BMP. This model provides the opportunity to see a side by side comparison of BMPs in a retrofit situation and to evaluate their implementation based on cost and performance."],"dc:format":["application/pdf","p.97","3.37 MB"],"dc:identifier":["http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1353085450"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of Toledo / OhioLINK"],"dc:rights":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."],"dc:subject":["Civil Engineering","storm water","best management practices","comparison analysis"],"dc:title":["Development of a Method to Compare Storm Water Best Management Practices at The University of Toledo"],"dc:type":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science in Civil Engineering"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Toledo"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:36:23Z"}