{"id":{"repo_id":"ohiolink","oai_identifier":"oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:osu1365703741"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ohiolink/oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:osu1365703741","repository":{"repo_id":"ohiolink","name":"OhioLINK","base_url":"https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/oai/oai"},"display":{"title":"Glocalizing Forests: Transnational Networks and the Geography of Global Climate Policy","abstract":"Discussions of global climate policy center on proposals for reform of theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiating process. The focus on state actors to the exclusion of other types oforganizations active in global climate policy, however, glosses over the challengesof moving from agreement to implementation and underestimates the potentialof sub-global actions. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation(REDD+), a popular initiative which aims to support forest conservation withclimate mitigation funds, provides an excellent example of the promises and pitfalls of thinking about climate policy from the perspective of the messy networksof transnational actors that make up its skeletal structure. The transnational networks supporting REDD+ policy development and implementation are geographically uneven, centered on donor countries of the global North and in particularcities like Washington, DC, and Geneva, Switzerland. This spatially centralizedbut institutionally decentralized structure, which I call \\concentrated polycentricity,\" may limit the ability of those affected by REDD+ activities to engage indemocratic control over policy creation. Encouraging local ownership of REDD+policies can help mitigate some of these problems.","abstract_html":"Discussions of global climate policy center on proposals for reform of theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiating process. The focus on state actors to the exclusion of other types oforganizations active in global climate policy, however, glosses over the challengesof moving from agreement to implementation and underestimates the potentialof sub-global actions. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation(REDD+), a popular initiative which aims to support forest conservation withclimate mitigation funds, provides an excellent example of the promises and pitfalls of thinking about climate policy from the perspective of the messy networksof transnational actors that make up its skeletal structure. The transnational networks supporting REDD+ policy development and implementation are geographically uneven, centered on donor countries of the global North and in particularcities like Washington, DC, and Geneva, Switzerland. This spatially centralizedbut institutionally decentralized structure, which I call \\concentrated polycentricity," may limit the ability of those affected by REDD+ activities to engage indemocratic control over policy creation. Encouraging local ownership of REDD+policies can help mitigate some of these problems.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gallemore, Caleb Tyrell"],"institution":"The Ohio State University","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Geography","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Munroe, Darla"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-08-09","date_published":"2013-08-09","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:37:01Z","subjects":["Geography","REDD+","deforestation","networks","transnational relations","climate change","policy networks"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1365703741","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Munroe, Darla"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gallemore, Caleb Tyrell"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2013-08-09"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["The Ohio State University / OhioLINK"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Geography"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Ohio State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Geography","REDD+","deforestation","networks","transnational relations","climate change","policy networks"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1365703741"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Discussions of global climate policy center on proposals for reform of theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiating process. The focus on state actors to the exclusion of other types oforganizations active in global climate policy, however, glosses over the challengesof moving from agreement to implementation and underestimates the potentialof sub-global actions. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation(REDD+), a popular initiative which aims to support forest conservation withclimate mitigation funds, provides an excellent example of the promises and pitfalls of thinking about climate policy from the perspective of the messy networksof transnational actors that make up its skeletal structure. The transnational networks supporting REDD+ policy development and implementation are geographically uneven, centered on donor countries of the global North and in particularcities like Washington, DC, and Geneva, Switzerland. This spatially centralizedbut institutionally decentralized structure, which I call \\concentrated polycentricity,\" may limit the ability of those affected by REDD+ activities to engage indemocratic control over policy creation. Encouraging local ownership of REDD+policies can help mitigate some of these problems."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf","p.295","52.76 MB"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Glocalizing Forests: Transnational Networks and the Geography of Global Climate Policy"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Munroe, Darla"],"dc:creator":["Gallemore, Caleb Tyrell"],"dc:date":["2013-08-09"],"dc:description":["Discussions of global climate policy center on proposals for reform of theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiating process. The focus on state actors to the exclusion of other types oforganizations active in global climate policy, however, glosses over the challengesof moving from agreement to implementation and underestimates the potentialof sub-global actions. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation(REDD+), a popular initiative which aims to support forest conservation withclimate mitigation funds, provides an excellent example of the promises and pitfalls of thinking about climate policy from the perspective of the messy networksof transnational actors that make up its skeletal structure. The transnational networks supporting REDD+ policy development and implementation are geographically uneven, centered on donor countries of the global North and in particularcities like Washington, DC, and Geneva, Switzerland. This spatially centralizedbut institutionally decentralized structure, which I call \\concentrated polycentricity,\" may limit the ability of those affected by REDD+ activities to engage indemocratic control over policy creation. Encouraging local ownership of REDD+policies can help mitigate some of these problems."],"dc:format":["application/pdf","p.295","52.76 MB"],"dc:identifier":["http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1365703741"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["The Ohio State University / OhioLINK"],"dc:rights":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."],"dc:subject":["Geography","REDD+","deforestation","networks","transnational relations","climate change","policy networks"],"dc:title":["Glocalizing Forests: Transnational Networks and the Geography of Global Climate Policy"],"dc:type":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Geography"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Ohio State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:37:01Z"}