Ohio University
Platonic Interpretation is Set in Wax, Not Stone: Evidence for a Developmentalist Reading of <i>Theaetetus</i> 151-187
Abstract
dc:descriptionInterpreting Plato is a difficult, divisive affair. This is particularly apparent in the <i>Theaetetus</i> where there are two primary interpretations of the first definition of knowledge—Reading A and Reading B, Unitarian and Developmentalist interpretations respectively. Reading A claims Plato has accepted moderate versions of Heraclitean Flux (HF) and Protagoras’ Measure Doctrine (MD). Reading B finds Plato rejecting both theories. This thesis provides a brief history of Platonic interpretation, an exposition of the first definition of knowledge, and evidence for Reading B. The evidence appeals to the two Readings’ mutually exclusive interpretations. The thesis suggests essential features of moderate versions of HF and MD, relates them to modern empiricists’ notion of sense-impressions, and then shows that Plato rejects sense-impressions later in the dialogue. Thus, showing that Plato does not accept moderate versions of HF and MD, and providing corroborating evidence that Reading B is correct.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Master of Arts (MA)
- Level thesis:degree_level
- masters
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Philosophy (Arts and Sciences)
- Grantor dc:publisher
- Ohio University
- Year dc:date
- 2013
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Nelson, Andrew R.
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Carson, Scott
Subjects
dc:subject × 20Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- unrestricted
- This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws.
- Language dc:language
- English
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1357783982
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:ohiou1357783982