Abstract
dc:descriptionRepetitive thought strategies, such as rumination, have been linked to negative outcomes following stressful events. It has been proposed that some repetitive thoughts may serve an adaptive function for some individuals. This study examined the impact of various rumination strategies on negative and positive outcomes and the centrality of an event as a context under which the nature of rumination might change. Five hundred eighty college students reported their use of brooding, reflecting, deliberate, and intrusive rumination. Outcomes measured were symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress, and posttraumatic growth. With few exceptions, main effects were found for centrality and each type of rumination. Centrality moderated several relationships; those with low centrality were less impacted by the negative effects of rumination and more able to achieve posttraumatic growth. Findings highlight the importance of addressing rumination in clinical interventions and of considering centrality when employing strategies that rely on processing stress or trauma.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Master of Arts
- Level thesis:degree_level
- masters
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Psychology
- Grantor dc:publisher
- Miami University
- Year dc:date
- 2013
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Allbaugh, Lucy Jane
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Wright, Margaret
Subjects
dc:subject × 5Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- unrestricted
- This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: some rights reserved. It is licensed for use under a Creative Commons license. Specific terms and permissions are available from this document's record in the OhioLINK ETD Center.
- Language dc:language
- English
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1364730564
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:miami1364730564