{"id":{"repo_id":"ohiolink","oai_identifier":"oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:case1365080790"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ohiolink/oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:case1365080790","repository":{"repo_id":"ohiolink","name":"OhioLINK","base_url":"https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/oai/oai"},"display":{"title":"Separability of Effects in the Analysis of Complex Observational Data","abstract":"Observational studies contribute to the overall body of knowledge, frequently capturing how medicine is practiced in a real-life setting, where patients and therapies are diverse and not limited by research protocol. However, they can present analytic challenges for these reasons, among them non-ignorable treatment assignment resulting in confounding by indication, and the presence of structural zeros in the data. This study addresses these two challenges in the context of an observational study of children receiving sedation outside of the operating room, with the goal of estimating the risk of adverse events associated with the use of propofol. Since each child received at least one sedative, the risk without any drugs was not observable. Logistic regression was used initially, using propensity scores to address the non-ignorable treatment assignments. Propofol was found to be no more or less risky than other drugs used for the same purpose. This analysis has limitations caused by the presence of structural zeros, leading to uncertainty regarding interactions between drugs and resulting inability to provide a risk profile as guidance for the physician. Next, a methodology called Separability of Effects (SE) is developed. It states that SE is present when the stepwise process with respect to a class of variables leads to the same conclusion whether subjects exhibiting those variables are included or not. The sedation unit data was used to illustrate the method and to show how it addresses limitations of the regression analysis. Meaningful differences among drug combinations were found, despite non-significant interaction terms in the regression. A risk profile for propofol was developed using the SE method. Third, a simulation study was conducted where a hypothetical set of children receiving no drug was added to the observed sedation data. The effect of the addition of these data on the main effect of propofol and its interactions is presented. The results support the conclusion that, in the absence of baseline risk data, the SE method provides information on the risks associated with drug combinations not necessarily detected by interaction terms of regression models. The results are consistent over changes in the proportion of hypothetical data.","abstract_html":"Observational studies contribute to the overall body of knowledge, frequently capturing how medicine is practiced in a real-life setting, where patients and therapies are diverse and not limited by research protocol. However, they can present analytic challenges for these reasons, among them non-ignorable treatment assignment resulting in confounding by indication, and the presence of structural zeros in the data. This study addresses these two challenges in the context of an observational study of children receiving sedation outside of the operating room, with the goal of estimating the risk of adverse events associated with the use of propofol. Since each child received at least one sedative, the risk without any drugs was not observable. Logistic regression was used initially, using propensity scores to address the non-ignorable treatment assignments. Propofol was found to be no more or less risky than other drugs used for the same purpose. This analysis has limitations caused by the presence of structural zeros, leading to uncertainty regarding interactions between drugs and resulting inability to provide a risk profile as guidance for the physician. Next, a methodology called Separability of Effects (SE) is developed. It states that SE is present when the stepwise process with respect to a class of variables leads to the same conclusion whether subjects exhibiting those variables are included or not. The sedation unit data was used to illustrate the method and to show how it addresses limitations of the regression analysis. Meaningful differences among drug combinations were found, despite non-significant interaction terms in the regression. A risk profile for propofol was developed using the SE method. Third, a simulation study was conducted where a hypothetical set of children receiving no drug was added to the observed sedation data. The effect of the addition of these data on the main effect of propofol and its interactions is presented. The results support the conclusion that, in the absence of baseline risk data, the SE method provides information on the risks associated with drug combinations not necessarily detected by interaction terms of regression models. The results are consistent over changes in the proportion of hypothetical data.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["O'Riordan, Mary Ann"],"institution":"Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Epidemiology and Biostatistics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Debanne, Sara"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-08-19","date_published":"2013-08-19","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:37:16Z","subjects":["Biostatistics","Biomedical Research","Epidemiology","Medicine","Pharmacoepidemiology","Drug safety","Structural zero"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1365080790","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Debanne, Sara"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["O'Riordan, Mary Ann"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2013-08-19"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies / OhioLINK"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Epidemiology and Biostatistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Biostatistics","Biomedical Research","Epidemiology","Medicine","Pharmacoepidemiology","Drug safety","Structural zero"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1365080790"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Observational studies contribute to the overall body of knowledge, frequently capturing how medicine is practiced in a real-life setting, where patients and therapies are diverse and not limited by research protocol. However, they can present analytic challenges for these reasons, among them non-ignorable treatment assignment resulting in confounding by indication, and the presence of structural zeros in the data. This study addresses these two challenges in the context of an observational study of children receiving sedation outside of the operating room, with the goal of estimating the risk of adverse events associated with the use of propofol. Since each child received at least one sedative, the risk without any drugs was not observable. Logistic regression was used initially, using propensity scores to address the non-ignorable treatment assignments. Propofol was found to be no more or less risky than other drugs used for the same purpose. This analysis has limitations caused by the presence of structural zeros, leading to uncertainty regarding interactions between drugs and resulting inability to provide a risk profile as guidance for the physician. Next, a methodology called Separability of Effects (SE) is developed. It states that SE is present when the stepwise process with respect to a class of variables leads to the same conclusion whether subjects exhibiting those variables are included or not. The sedation unit data was used to illustrate the method and to show how it addresses limitations of the regression analysis. Meaningful differences among drug combinations were found, despite non-significant interaction terms in the regression. A risk profile for propofol was developed using the SE method. Third, a simulation study was conducted where a hypothetical set of children receiving no drug was added to the observed sedation data. The effect of the addition of these data on the main effect of propofol and its interactions is presented. The results support the conclusion that, in the absence of baseline risk data, the SE method provides information on the risks associated with drug combinations not necessarily detected by interaction terms of regression models. The results are consistent over changes in the proportion of hypothetical data."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf","p.92","1.02 MB"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Separability of Effects in the Analysis of Complex Observational Data"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Debanne, Sara"],"dc:creator":["O'Riordan, Mary Ann"],"dc:date":["2013-08-19"],"dc:description":["Observational studies contribute to the overall body of knowledge, frequently capturing how medicine is practiced in a real-life setting, where patients and therapies are diverse and not limited by research protocol. However, they can present analytic challenges for these reasons, among them non-ignorable treatment assignment resulting in confounding by indication, and the presence of structural zeros in the data. This study addresses these two challenges in the context of an observational study of children receiving sedation outside of the operating room, with the goal of estimating the risk of adverse events associated with the use of propofol. Since each child received at least one sedative, the risk without any drugs was not observable. Logistic regression was used initially, using propensity scores to address the non-ignorable treatment assignments. Propofol was found to be no more or less risky than other drugs used for the same purpose. This analysis has limitations caused by the presence of structural zeros, leading to uncertainty regarding interactions between drugs and resulting inability to provide a risk profile as guidance for the physician. Next, a methodology called Separability of Effects (SE) is developed. It states that SE is present when the stepwise process with respect to a class of variables leads to the same conclusion whether subjects exhibiting those variables are included or not. The sedation unit data was used to illustrate the method and to show how it addresses limitations of the regression analysis. Meaningful differences among drug combinations were found, despite non-significant interaction terms in the regression. A risk profile for propofol was developed using the SE method. Third, a simulation study was conducted where a hypothetical set of children receiving no drug was added to the observed sedation data. The effect of the addition of these data on the main effect of propofol and its interactions is presented. The results support the conclusion that, in the absence of baseline risk data, the SE method provides information on the risks associated with drug combinations not necessarily detected by interaction terms of regression models. The results are consistent over changes in the proportion of hypothetical data."],"dc:format":["application/pdf","p.92","1.02 MB"],"dc:identifier":["http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1365080790"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies / OhioLINK"],"dc:rights":["unrestricted","This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws."],"dc:subject":["Biostatistics","Biomedical Research","Epidemiology","Medicine","Pharmacoepidemiology","Drug safety","Structural zero"],"dc:title":["Separability of Effects in the Analysis of Complex Observational Data"],"dc:type":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Epidemiology and Biostatistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:37:16Z"}