The present study examined the main and interactive effects of information format, information density, principle of information grouping, orientation of the airspeed scale, and task type on response time (RT) and accuracy in a decision making task. Forty-eight college students viewed static displays of primary flight instruments and signaled responses to the displays by pressing keys on the computer keyboard. Three levels of task type were employed. In the current state estimation task, subjects were required to determine whether each individual instrument reading was within prespecified limits. In the future state estimation task, subjects were required to attend to the relationship between instrument readings, and to estimate the implication of these relationships for future flight conditions. In the combined task condition, subjects completed both the current and the future state estimation tasks during each experimental trial. All subjects were exposed to three levels of information format (analogue, digital, or combined analogue and digital displays), and to three levels of information density (low, medium, or high).
","abstract_html":"<p>The present study examined the main and interactive effects of information format, information density, principle of information grouping, orientation of the airspeed scale, and task type on response time (RT) and accuracy in a decision making task. Forty-eight college students viewed static displays of primary flight instruments and signaled responses to the displays by pressing keys on the computer keyboard. Three levels of task type were employed. In the current state estimation task, subjects were required to determine whether each individual instrument reading was within prespecified limits. In the future state estimation task, subjects were required to attend to the relationship between instrument readings, and to estimate the implication of these relationships for future flight conditions. In the combined task condition, subjects completed both the current and the future state estimation tasks during each experimental trial. All subjects were exposed to three levels of information format (analogue, digital, or combined analogue and digital displays), and to three levels of information density (low, medium, or high).</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Converse, Sharolyn Ann"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Glynn D. Coates","Frederick Freeman","Raymond H. Kirby","Randall L. Harris, Sr."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1988,"date_issued":"1988-07-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"1988-07-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:35:15Z","subjects":["Experiments","Design principles","Complex displays","Tasks","Industrial and Organizational Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/263","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Glynn D. Coates","Frederick Freeman","Raymond H. Kirby","Randall L. Harris, Sr."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Converse, Sharolyn Ann"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-10-03T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Experiments","Design principles","Complex displays","Tasks","Industrial and Organizational Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/263"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The present study examined the main and interactive effects of information format, information density, principle of information grouping, orientation of the airspeed scale, and task type on response time (RT) and accuracy in a decision making task. Forty-eight college students viewed static displays of primary flight instruments and signaled responses to the displays by pressing keys on the computer keyboard. Three levels of task type were employed. In the current state estimation task, subjects were required to determine whether each individual instrument reading was within prespecified limits. In the future state estimation task, subjects were required to attend to the relationship between instrument readings, and to estimate the implication of these relationships for future flight conditions. In the combined task condition, subjects completed both the current and the future state estimation tasks during each experimental trial. All subjects were exposed to three levels of information format (analogue, digital, or combined analogue and digital displays), and to three levels of information density (low, medium, or high).
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Principles of Design for Complex Displays: A Comparative Evaluation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Glynn D. Coates","Frederick Freeman","Raymond H. Kirby","Randall L. Harris, Sr."],"dc:creator":["Converse, Sharolyn Ann"],"dc:date.available":["2019-10-03T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The present study examined the main and interactive effects of information format, information density, principle of information grouping, orientation of the airspeed scale, and task type on response time (RT) and accuracy in a decision making task. Forty-eight college students viewed static displays of primary flight instruments and signaled responses to the displays by pressing keys on the computer keyboard. Three levels of task type were employed. In the current state estimation task, subjects were required to determine whether each individual instrument reading was within prespecified limits. In the future state estimation task, subjects were required to attend to the relationship between instrument readings, and to estimate the implication of these relationships for future flight conditions. In the combined task condition, subjects completed both the current and the future state estimation tasks during each experimental trial. All subjects were exposed to three levels of information format (analogue, digital, or combined analogue and digital displays), and to three levels of information density (low, medium, or high).
"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/263"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"dc:subject":["Experiments","Design principles","Complex displays","Tasks","Industrial and Organizational Psychology"],"dc:title":["Principles of Design for Complex Displays: A Comparative Evaluation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:35:15Z"}