The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of training method and amount of practice-and-feedback on the accuracy of performance ratings and behavioral observation. This research was a 3 x 3 factorial ANOVA design. Training method was comprised of frame-of-reference, cognitive modeling, and a no-training control group. Practice-and-feedback consisted of 0, 1, and 3 practice trials. Undergraduates (N = 99) were randomly assigned to one of nine experimental conditions. Each participant viewed and rated 7 videotaped interview simulations. The results for performance ratings indicated that (a) frame-of-reference training produced the most accurate ratings for elevation, differential elevation, and differential accuracy, and (b) practice-and-feedback did not improve accuracy. The results for behavioral observation revealed that (a) cognitive modeling training was effective in reducing the raters' 1-hit rates, (b) training method had no effect on false alarm rate, and (c) practice-and-feedback were ineffective for both observation error rates. Interpretation and suggestions for future research are discussed.
","abstract_html":"<p>The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of training method and amount of practice-and-feedback on the accuracy of performance ratings and behavioral observation. This research was a 3 x 3 factorial ANOVA design. Training method was comprised of frame-of-reference, cognitive modeling, and a no-training control group. Practice-and-feedback consisted of 0, 1, and 3 practice trials. Undergraduates (N = 99) were randomly assigned to one of nine experimental conditions. Each participant viewed and rated 7 videotaped interview simulations. The results for performance ratings indicated that (a) frame-of-reference training produced the most accurate ratings for elevation, differential elevation, and differential accuracy, and (b) practice-and-feedback did not improve accuracy. The results for behavioral observation revealed that (a) cognitive modeling training was effective in reducing the raters' 1-hit rates, (b) training method had no effect on false alarm rate, and (c) practice-and-feedback were ineffective for both observation error rates. Interpretation and suggestions for future research are discussed.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cesare, Salvatore J."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Terry L. Dickinson","Glynn D. Coates","Peter J. Mikulka","Robert M. McIntyre"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1989,"date_issued":"1989-04-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1989-04-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:35:15Z","subjects":["Training methods","Evaluation","Performance measurement","Practice","Industrial and Organizational Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/265","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Terry L. Dickinson","Glynn D. Coates","Peter J. Mikulka","Robert M. McIntyre"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cesare, Salvatore J."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-10-03T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Training methods","Evaluation","Performance measurement","Practice","Industrial and Organizational Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/265"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of training method and amount of practice-and-feedback on the accuracy of performance ratings and behavioral observation. This research was a 3 x 3 factorial ANOVA design. Training method was comprised of frame-of-reference, cognitive modeling, and a no-training control group. Practice-and-feedback consisted of 0, 1, and 3 practice trials. Undergraduates (N = 99) were randomly assigned to one of nine experimental conditions. Each participant viewed and rated 7 videotaped interview simulations. The results for performance ratings indicated that (a) frame-of-reference training produced the most accurate ratings for elevation, differential elevation, and differential accuracy, and (b) practice-and-feedback did not improve accuracy. The results for behavioral observation revealed that (a) cognitive modeling training was effective in reducing the raters' 1-hit rates, (b) training method had no effect on false alarm rate, and (c) practice-and-feedback were ineffective for both observation error rates. Interpretation and suggestions for future research are discussed.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Accuracy of Performance Measurement: An Investigation of Training Method and Amount of Practice"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Terry L. Dickinson","Glynn D. Coates","Peter J. Mikulka","Robert M. McIntyre"],"dc:creator":["Cesare, Salvatore J."],"dc:date.available":["2019-10-03T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of training method and amount of practice-and-feedback on the accuracy of performance ratings and behavioral observation. This research was a 3 x 3 factorial ANOVA design. Training method was comprised of frame-of-reference, cognitive modeling, and a no-training control group. Practice-and-feedback consisted of 0, 1, and 3 practice trials. Undergraduates (N = 99) were randomly assigned to one of nine experimental conditions. Each participant viewed and rated 7 videotaped interview simulations. The results for performance ratings indicated that (a) frame-of-reference training produced the most accurate ratings for elevation, differential elevation, and differential accuracy, and (b) practice-and-feedback did not improve accuracy. The results for behavioral observation revealed that (a) cognitive modeling training was effective in reducing the raters' 1-hit rates, (b) training method had no effect on false alarm rate, and (c) practice-and-feedback were ineffective for both observation error rates. Interpretation and suggestions for future research are discussed.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/265"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"dc:subject":["Training methods","Evaluation","Performance measurement","Practice","Industrial and Organizational Psychology"],"dc:title":["Accuracy of Performance Measurement: An Investigation of Training Method and Amount of Practice"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:35:15Z"}