The contribution of stress in the development of chronic and terminal disease has garnered significant interest in contemporary research. The current study aims to look at how performance in domains of cognitive function may affect autonomic-cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to psychologically stressful tasks as such reactions, over time, may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease.
The current study analyzed data from 209 healthy middle-age adults. This included four neuropsychological tests utilized here to represent abilities in four different cognitive domains: response inhibition, mental flexibility, verbal memory, and nonverbal memory. The participants were also introduced to three psychologically stressful tasks while blood pressure, heart rate, and spectral components of heart rate variability measurements were taken during the tasks and the post-task recovery period.
Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. However, superior performance in response inhibition was significantly positively associated with both LF-HRV (p = .04) and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the immediate recovery phase and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the delayed recovery phase. Such findings suggest that greater response inhibition abilities may contribute to greater vagally induced recovery from stressful tasks. Such a response can be considered healthy and likely acts as a protective factor against the development of cardiovascular disease.
","abstract_html":"<p>The contribution of stress in the development of chronic and terminal disease has garnered significant interest in contemporary research. The current study aims to look at how performance in domains of cognitive function may affect autonomic-cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to psychologically stressful tasks as such reactions, over time, may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease.</p> <p>The current study analyzed data from 209 healthy middle-age adults. This included four neuropsychological tests utilized here to represent abilities in four different cognitive domains: response inhibition, mental flexibility, verbal memory, and nonverbal memory. The participants were also introduced to three psychologically stressful tasks while blood pressure, heart rate, and spectral components of heart rate variability measurements were taken during the tasks and the post-task recovery period.</p> <p>Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. However, superior performance in response inhibition was significantly positively associated with both LF-HRV (p = .04) and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the immediate recovery phase and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the delayed recovery phase. Such findings suggest that greater response inhibition abilities may contribute to greater vagally induced recovery from stressful tasks. Such a response can be considered healthy and likely acts as a protective factor against the development of cardiovascular disease.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mehta, Sanjay"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Serina Neumann","Michael Stutts","Christopher Ball","Leonard Holmes","Louis Janda"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-04-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2012-04-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:31Z","subjects":["Cardiovascular reactivity","Cardiovascular recovery","Cognitive function","Stress","Biological Psychology","Clinical Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9781267425522"],"render_values":[{"text":"9781267425522","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/211","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Serina Neumann","Michael Stutts","Christopher Ball","Leonard Holmes","Louis Janda"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mehta, Sanjay"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-04-09T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Cardiovascular reactivity","Cardiovascular recovery","Cognitive function","Stress","Biological Psychology","Clinical Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9781267425522","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/211"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The contribution of stress in the development of chronic and terminal disease has garnered significant interest in contemporary research. The current study aims to look at how performance in domains of cognitive function may affect autonomic-cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to psychologically stressful tasks as such reactions, over time, may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease.
The current study analyzed data from 209 healthy middle-age adults. This included four neuropsychological tests utilized here to represent abilities in four different cognitive domains: response inhibition, mental flexibility, verbal memory, and nonverbal memory. The participants were also introduced to three psychologically stressful tasks while blood pressure, heart rate, and spectral components of heart rate variability measurements were taken during the tasks and the post-task recovery period.
Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. However, superior performance in response inhibition was significantly positively associated with both LF-HRV (p = .04) and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the immediate recovery phase and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the delayed recovery phase. Such findings suggest that greater response inhibition abilities may contribute to greater vagally induced recovery from stressful tasks. Such a response can be considered healthy and likely acts as a protective factor against the development of cardiovascular disease.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Association of Cognitive Function with Autonomic-Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Stress"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Serina Neumann","Michael Stutts","Christopher Ball","Leonard Holmes","Louis Janda"],"dc:creator":["Mehta, Sanjay"],"dc:date.available":["2019-04-09T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The contribution of stress in the development of chronic and terminal disease has garnered significant interest in contemporary research. The current study aims to look at how performance in domains of cognitive function may affect autonomic-cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to psychologically stressful tasks as such reactions, over time, may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease.
The current study analyzed data from 209 healthy middle-age adults. This included four neuropsychological tests utilized here to represent abilities in four different cognitive domains: response inhibition, mental flexibility, verbal memory, and nonverbal memory. The participants were also introduced to three psychologically stressful tasks while blood pressure, heart rate, and spectral components of heart rate variability measurements were taken during the tasks and the post-task recovery period.
Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. Results showed no significant relationship between blood pressure reactivity or recovery and cognitive function. No significant relationship was found between heart rate variability reactivity and cognitive function. However, superior performance in response inhibition was significantly positively associated with both LF-HRV (p = .04) and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the immediate recovery phase and HF-HRV (p = .02) in the delayed recovery phase. Such findings suggest that greater response inhibition abilities may contribute to greater vagally induced recovery from stressful tasks. Such a response can be considered healthy and likely acts as a protective factor against the development of cardiovascular disease.
"],"dc:identifier":["9781267425522","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/211"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"dc:subject":["Cardiovascular reactivity","Cardiovascular recovery","Cognitive function","Stress","Biological Psychology","Clinical Psychology"],"dc:title":["The Association of Cognitive Function with Autonomic-Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Stress"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:31Z"}