A modified version of Kelly's Repertory Test was administered to 15 women identified as eating-restrained, 21 women identified as non-eating-restrained and matched on neuroticism, and 15 women identified as non-eating restrained and low on neuroticism in order to elicit personal constructs related to being overweight, average weight, and underweight. The personal constructs were used in measures of components of self-concept: real self, ideal self, social self, and ideal social self. It was hypothesized that in comparison to the other two groups, the eating-restrained women would exhibit a distinct pattern among the components of self-concept: Real and ideal selves would be more disparate; real and social selves would be less disparate; ideal and ideal social selves would be less disparate. Subsequent to gathering the data, a fourth hypothesis predicting that social and ideal social self would be more disparate for eating-restrained women was added to the study. Profiles on the Eating Disorders Inventory-2 indicated that most of the women identified as eating-restrained were qualitatively distinct from anorexic women: consequently this group was renamed the non-weight-preoccupied eating-rest rained group. In analyses that compared the non-weight-preoccupied group with matched neurotic and low neurotic groups, no differences were found on the disparity measures. When a smaller group of women, who more closely resembled an anorexic population was identified (the weight-preoccupied eating-restrained group), results provided weak support for two of the hypotheses: Real self and ideal self, and social self and ideal social self were more disparate for the eating-restrained group. Results from exploratory analyses indicated that all three groups of women endorsed normal weight characteristics more strongly on the four components of self-concept.
","abstract_html":"<p>A modified version of Kelly's Repertory Test was administered to 15 women identified as eating-restrained, 21 women identified as non-eating-restrained and matched on neuroticism, and 15 women identified as non-eating restrained and low on neuroticism in order to elicit personal constructs related to being overweight, average weight, and underweight. The personal constructs were used in measures of components of self-concept: real self, ideal self, social self, and ideal social self. It was hypothesized that in comparison to the other two groups, the eating-restrained women would exhibit a distinct pattern among the components of self-concept: Real and ideal selves would be more disparate; real and social selves would be less disparate; ideal and ideal social selves would be less disparate. Subsequent to gathering the data, a fourth hypothesis predicting that social and ideal social self would be more disparate for eating-restrained women was added to the study. Profiles on the Eating Disorders Inventory-2 indicated that most of the women identified as eating-restrained were qualitatively distinct from anorexic women: consequently this group was renamed the non-weight-preoccupied eating-rest rained group. In analyses that compared the non-weight-preoccupied group with matched neurotic and low neurotic groups, no differences were found on the disparity measures. When a smaller group of women, who more closely resembled an anorexic population was identified (the weight-preoccupied eating-restrained group), results provided weak support for two of the hypotheses: Real self and ideal self, and social self and ideal social self were more disparate for the eating-restrained group. Results from exploratory analyses indicated that all three groups of women endorsed normal weight characteristics more strongly on the four components of self-concept.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Furr, Adelia Atkinson"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Neill Watson","Ellen F. Rosen","Barbara Cubic","Laura G. Roberto","Michael P. Nichols"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1997,"date_issued":"1997-04-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1997-04-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:31Z","subjects":["Anorexia","Kelly's Repertory Test","Clinical Psychology","Women's Studies"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591481273"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780591481273","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/195","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Neill Watson","Ellen F. Rosen","Barbara Cubic","Laura G. Roberto","Michael P. Nichols"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Furr, Adelia Atkinson"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-04-08T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Anorexia","Kelly's Repertory Test","Clinical Psychology","Women's Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591481273","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/195"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["A modified version of Kelly's Repertory Test was administered to 15 women identified as eating-restrained, 21 women identified as non-eating-restrained and matched on neuroticism, and 15 women identified as non-eating restrained and low on neuroticism in order to elicit personal constructs related to being overweight, average weight, and underweight. The personal constructs were used in measures of components of self-concept: real self, ideal self, social self, and ideal social self. It was hypothesized that in comparison to the other two groups, the eating-restrained women would exhibit a distinct pattern among the components of self-concept: Real and ideal selves would be more disparate; real and social selves would be less disparate; ideal and ideal social selves would be less disparate. Subsequent to gathering the data, a fourth hypothesis predicting that social and ideal social self would be more disparate for eating-restrained women was added to the study. Profiles on the Eating Disorders Inventory-2 indicated that most of the women identified as eating-restrained were qualitatively distinct from anorexic women: consequently this group was renamed the non-weight-preoccupied eating-rest rained group. In analyses that compared the non-weight-preoccupied group with matched neurotic and low neurotic groups, no differences were found on the disparity measures. When a smaller group of women, who more closely resembled an anorexic population was identified (the weight-preoccupied eating-restrained group), results provided weak support for two of the hypotheses: Real self and ideal self, and social self and ideal social self were more disparate for the eating-restrained group. Results from exploratory analyses indicated that all three groups of women endorsed normal weight characteristics more strongly on the four components of self-concept.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Self-Concept of Eating-Restrained Women: A Study of Personal Constructs"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Neill Watson","Ellen F. Rosen","Barbara Cubic","Laura G. Roberto","Michael P. Nichols"],"dc:creator":["Furr, Adelia Atkinson"],"dc:date.available":["2019-04-08T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["A modified version of Kelly's Repertory Test was administered to 15 women identified as eating-restrained, 21 women identified as non-eating-restrained and matched on neuroticism, and 15 women identified as non-eating restrained and low on neuroticism in order to elicit personal constructs related to being overweight, average weight, and underweight. The personal constructs were used in measures of components of self-concept: real self, ideal self, social self, and ideal social self. It was hypothesized that in comparison to the other two groups, the eating-restrained women would exhibit a distinct pattern among the components of self-concept: Real and ideal selves would be more disparate; real and social selves would be less disparate; ideal and ideal social selves would be less disparate. Subsequent to gathering the data, a fourth hypothesis predicting that social and ideal social self would be more disparate for eating-restrained women was added to the study. Profiles on the Eating Disorders Inventory-2 indicated that most of the women identified as eating-restrained were qualitatively distinct from anorexic women: consequently this group was renamed the non-weight-preoccupied eating-rest rained group. In analyses that compared the non-weight-preoccupied group with matched neurotic and low neurotic groups, no differences were found on the disparity measures. When a smaller group of women, who more closely resembled an anorexic population was identified (the weight-preoccupied eating-restrained group), results provided weak support for two of the hypotheses: Real self and ideal self, and social self and ideal social self were more disparate for the eating-restrained group. Results from exploratory analyses indicated that all three groups of women endorsed normal weight characteristics more strongly on the four components of self-concept.
"],"dc:identifier":["9780591481273","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/195"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"dc:subject":["Anorexia","Kelly's Repertory Test","Clinical Psychology","Women's Studies"],"dc:title":["Self-Concept of Eating-Restrained Women: A Study of Personal Constructs"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:31Z"}