The goal of the present study was to examine how interruptions during a laparoscopic skills training task affected task performance. Undergraduate students completed a task that required them to pick up and transfer colored objects in a specific, predetermined sequence. The number of colored objects in the sequence was varied to produce three levels of task demand. During execution of the primary task, participants were interrupted by auditory task-irrelevant communication. The temporal length of interruptions was also manipulated to produce three levels of interruption duration. Results showed that participants made significantly more sequence errors in the high demand condition than in the moderate demand condition. Unexpectedly, a large majority of participants were distracted instead of interrupted by the auditory communication. It was found that distractions did not significantly impair task performance. The general implication of the findings was that the peg transfer task from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery is attentionally demanding, particularly when the complexity of the task is increased. However, a non-interruptive auditory dialogue (e.g., communication with trainers or team members) may be time-shared with laparoscopic skills training for novices with minimal impact on performance.
","abstract_html":"<p>The goal of the present study was to examine how interruptions during a laparoscopic skills training task affected task performance. Undergraduate students completed a task that required them to pick up and transfer colored objects in a specific, predetermined sequence. The number of colored objects in the sequence was varied to produce three levels of task demand. During execution of the primary task, participants were interrupted by auditory task-irrelevant communication. The temporal length of interruptions was also manipulated to produce three levels of interruption duration. Results showed that participants made significantly more sequence errors in the high demand condition than in the moderate demand condition. Unexpectedly, a large majority of participants were distracted instead of interrupted by the auditory communication. It was found that distractions did not significantly impair task performance. The general implication of the findings was that the peg transfer task from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery is attentionally demanding, particularly when the complexity of the task is increased. However, a non-interruptive auditory dialogue (e.g., communication with trainers or team members) may be time-shared with laparoscopic skills training for novices with minimal impact on performance.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fluegel, Brandon Allan"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mark W. Scerbo","Yusuke Yamani","James P. Bliss"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-07-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2017-07-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:02Z","subjects":["Attention","Distraction","Interruption","Laparoscopy","Surgery","Working memory","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780355830095"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780355830095","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/65","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mark W. Scerbo","Yusuke Yamani","James P. Bliss"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fluegel, Brandon Allan"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-04-10T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Attention","Distraction","Interruption","Laparoscopy","Surgery","Working memory","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780355830095","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/65"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The goal of the present study was to examine how interruptions during a laparoscopic skills training task affected task performance. Undergraduate students completed a task that required them to pick up and transfer colored objects in a specific, predetermined sequence. The number of colored objects in the sequence was varied to produce three levels of task demand. During execution of the primary task, participants were interrupted by auditory task-irrelevant communication. The temporal length of interruptions was also manipulated to produce three levels of interruption duration. Results showed that participants made significantly more sequence errors in the high demand condition than in the moderate demand condition. Unexpectedly, a large majority of participants were distracted instead of interrupted by the auditory communication. It was found that distractions did not significantly impair task performance. The general implication of the findings was that the peg transfer task from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery is attentionally demanding, particularly when the complexity of the task is increased. However, a non-interruptive auditory dialogue (e.g., communication with trainers or team members) may be time-shared with laparoscopic skills training for novices with minimal impact on performance.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effect of Interruptions During a Laparoscopy Skills Training Task"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mark W. Scerbo","Yusuke Yamani","James P. Bliss"],"dc:creator":["Fluegel, Brandon Allan"],"dc:date.available":["2018-04-10T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The goal of the present study was to examine how interruptions during a laparoscopic skills training task affected task performance. Undergraduate students completed a task that required them to pick up and transfer colored objects in a specific, predetermined sequence. The number of colored objects in the sequence was varied to produce three levels of task demand. During execution of the primary task, participants were interrupted by auditory task-irrelevant communication. The temporal length of interruptions was also manipulated to produce three levels of interruption duration. Results showed that participants made significantly more sequence errors in the high demand condition than in the moderate demand condition. Unexpectedly, a large majority of participants were distracted instead of interrupted by the auditory communication. It was found that distractions did not significantly impair task performance. The general implication of the findings was that the peg transfer task from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery is attentionally demanding, particularly when the complexity of the task is increased. However, a non-interruptive auditory dialogue (e.g., communication with trainers or team members) may be time-shared with laparoscopic skills training for novices with minimal impact on performance.
"],"dc:identifier":["9780355830095","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/65"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"dc:subject":["Attention","Distraction","Interruption","Laparoscopy","Surgery","Working memory","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Psychology"],"dc:title":["The Effect of Interruptions During a Laparoscopy Skills Training Task"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:02Z"}