{"id":{"repo_id":"odu","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.odu.edu:psychology_etds-1048"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/odu/oai:digitalcommons.odu.edu:psychology_etds-1048","repository":{"repo_id":"odu","name":"Old Dominion University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Reconceptualizing Women's STEM Experiences: Building a Theory of Positive Marginality","abstract":"<p>Since the 1980s, disciplines such as psychology and sociology have discussed the construct of positive marginality. Positive marginality describes the perception that belonging to a non-dominant cultural or demographic group can be advantageous rather than oppressing. To date, research on positive marginality has explored the construct in a qualitative manner across a number of demographic groups (e.g., Jewish women in social sciences, African American women in predominantly Caucasian workplaces). Because women are largely underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, the current research examined positive marginality in a STEM context. This research advances the existing understanding of positive marginality through two studies. Study 1 tested the psychometric properties of a new measure of positive marginality. A qualitative pilot study informed the generation of a measure of positive marginality which was administered to a sample of 105 sophomore and junior STEM majors (Study 1A) and a sample of 433 women working in STEM occupations (Study 1B). Exploratory factor analyses were conducted in Study 1A and 1B as well as a confirmatory factor analysis in Study 1B to test a hypothesized 3-factor structure of positive marginality. Results of Study 1 supported a single-factor structure of positive marginality. Study 2 identified and assessed a partial nomological network of the unidimensional construct among women working in STEM occupations. Specifically, a sample of 313 women working in STEM occupations were surveyed at two time points on hypothesized antecedents and outcomes of positive marginality. Structural equation modeling suggested support for core self-evaluations, need for achievement, and domain identification as antecedents of positive marginality; career satisfaction and persistence intentions were supported as outcomes of positive marginality for women in STEM. Together, these studies provide support for the relevance of positive marginality to women pursuing STEM careers and demonstrate the relationship between positive marginality and individual differences and career outcomes. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Since the 1980s, disciplines such as psychology and sociology have discussed the construct of positive marginality. Positive marginality describes the perception that belonging to a non-dominant cultural or demographic group can be advantageous rather than oppressing. To date, research on positive marginality has explored the construct in a qualitative manner across a number of demographic groups (e.g., Jewish women in social sciences, African American women in predominantly Caucasian workplaces). Because women are largely underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, the current research examined positive marginality in a STEM context. This research advances the existing understanding of positive marginality through two studies. Study 1 tested the psychometric properties of a new measure of positive marginality. A qualitative pilot study informed the generation of a measure of positive marginality which was administered to a sample of 105 sophomore and junior STEM majors (Study 1A) and a sample of 433 women working in STEM occupations (Study 1B). Exploratory factor analyses were conducted in Study 1A and 1B as well as a confirmatory factor analysis in Study 1B to test a hypothesized 3-factor structure of positive marginality. Results of Study 1 supported a single-factor structure of positive marginality. Study 2 identified and assessed a partial nomological network of the unidimensional construct among women working in STEM occupations. Specifically, a sample of 313 women working in STEM occupations were surveyed at two time points on hypothesized antecedents and outcomes of positive marginality. Structural equation modeling suggested support for core self-evaluations, need for achievement, and domain identification as antecedents of positive marginality; career satisfaction and persistence intentions were supported as outcomes of positive marginality for women in STEM. Together, these studies provide support for the relevance of positive marginality to women pursuing STEM careers and demonstrate the relationship between positive marginality and individual differences and career outcomes. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Streets, Valerie N."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Debra A. Major","Xiaixiao Hu","Holly Gaff"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-10-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2016-10-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:02Z","subjects":["Gender","Positive marginality","STEM","Underrepresentation","Women","Psychology","Women's Studies"],"languages":[],"rights":["<p>In Copyright. URI: <a href=\"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/\">http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</a> This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).</p>"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9781369563887"],"render_values":[{"text":"9781369563887","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/48","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Debra A. Major","Xiaixiao Hu","Holly Gaff"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Streets, Valerie N."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-02-22T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Gender","Positive marginality","STEM","Underrepresentation","Women","Psychology","Women's Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["<p>In Copyright. URI: <a href=\"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/\">http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</a> This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).</p>"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9781369563887","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/48"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Since the 1980s, disciplines such as psychology and sociology have discussed the construct of positive marginality. Positive marginality describes the perception that belonging to a non-dominant cultural or demographic group can be advantageous rather than oppressing. To date, research on positive marginality has explored the construct in a qualitative manner across a number of demographic groups (e.g., Jewish women in social sciences, African American women in predominantly Caucasian workplaces). Because women are largely underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, the current research examined positive marginality in a STEM context. This research advances the existing understanding of positive marginality through two studies. Study 1 tested the psychometric properties of a new measure of positive marginality. A qualitative pilot study informed the generation of a measure of positive marginality which was administered to a sample of 105 sophomore and junior STEM majors (Study 1A) and a sample of 433 women working in STEM occupations (Study 1B). Exploratory factor analyses were conducted in Study 1A and 1B as well as a confirmatory factor analysis in Study 1B to test a hypothesized 3-factor structure of positive marginality. Results of Study 1 supported a single-factor structure of positive marginality. Study 2 identified and assessed a partial nomological network of the unidimensional construct among women working in STEM occupations. Specifically, a sample of 313 women working in STEM occupations were surveyed at two time points on hypothesized antecedents and outcomes of positive marginality. Structural equation modeling suggested support for core self-evaluations, need for achievement, and domain identification as antecedents of positive marginality; career satisfaction and persistence intentions were supported as outcomes of positive marginality for women in STEM. Together, these studies provide support for the relevance of positive marginality to women pursuing STEM careers and demonstrate the relationship between positive marginality and individual differences and career outcomes. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Reconceptualizing Women's STEM Experiences: Building a Theory of Positive Marginality"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Debra A. Major","Xiaixiao Hu","Holly Gaff"],"dc:creator":["Streets, Valerie N."],"dc:date.available":["2017-02-22T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Since the 1980s, disciplines such as psychology and sociology have discussed the construct of positive marginality. Positive marginality describes the perception that belonging to a non-dominant cultural or demographic group can be advantageous rather than oppressing. To date, research on positive marginality has explored the construct in a qualitative manner across a number of demographic groups (e.g., Jewish women in social sciences, African American women in predominantly Caucasian workplaces). Because women are largely underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, the current research examined positive marginality in a STEM context. This research advances the existing understanding of positive marginality through two studies. Study 1 tested the psychometric properties of a new measure of positive marginality. A qualitative pilot study informed the generation of a measure of positive marginality which was administered to a sample of 105 sophomore and junior STEM majors (Study 1A) and a sample of 433 women working in STEM occupations (Study 1B). Exploratory factor analyses were conducted in Study 1A and 1B as well as a confirmatory factor analysis in Study 1B to test a hypothesized 3-factor structure of positive marginality. Results of Study 1 supported a single-factor structure of positive marginality. Study 2 identified and assessed a partial nomological network of the unidimensional construct among women working in STEM occupations. Specifically, a sample of 313 women working in STEM occupations were surveyed at two time points on hypothesized antecedents and outcomes of positive marginality. Structural equation modeling suggested support for core self-evaluations, need for achievement, and domain identification as antecedents of positive marginality; career satisfaction and persistence intentions were supported as outcomes of positive marginality for women in STEM. Together, these studies provide support for the relevance of positive marginality to women pursuing STEM careers and demonstrate the relationship between positive marginality and individual differences and career outcomes. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["9781369563887","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/48"],"dc:rights":["<p>In Copyright. URI: <a href=\"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/\">http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</a> This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).</p>"],"dc:subject":["Gender","Positive marginality","STEM","Underrepresentation","Women","Psychology","Women's Studies"],"dc:title":["Reconceptualizing Women's STEM Experiences: Building a Theory of Positive Marginality"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:34:02Z"}