Sex guilt is a generalized expectancy for self-mediated punishment for violating or anticipating violating standards of proper sexual conduct. Our current knowledge about sex guilt is primarily achieved through using explicit measures, particularly the widely used Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory. Research has shown that explicit sex guilt can predict many sexual behaviors such as sexual activity, number of sexual partners, and condom use. Responses on explicit measures, however, are influenced by dissimulation and social desirability, especially when assessing socially sensitive domains such as sexual attitudes. The present study hypothesized that adding implicit sex guilt as a second predictor to the Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory would significantly improve the prediction of sexual behaviors. An Implicit Association Test (IAT) was created for the purposes of this study. The IAT consisted of two dimensions: pictorial and lexical. For the pictorial section, the study contrasted the target category of sex with the more neutral category of exercise. The lexical dimensions were guilt-innocent. Two hundred and twenty five female and 48 male undergraduate students participated in the study. IAT and Mosher Sex Guilt scales were correlated (r = .25) which provided some support for the convergent validity of IAT sex guilt. Regression and correlation analyses indicated that IAT sex guilt was associated with whether or not participants were sexually active, the extent to which participants were satisfied with their first sexual intercourse, frequency of engaging in sexual intercourse, and contraceptive use. However, results on multiple regression and correlation indicated that when IAT was added to the model as a second predictor, it only improved the prediction of whether or not participants were sexually active. Overall, Mosher sex guilt demonstrated better convergent validity compared to IAT sex guilt and the results did not support the idea of IAT sex guilt increasing the amount of variance accounted for in sexual behaviors compared to the Mosher scale alone. The implementation of explicit measures for assessing outcome variables could be a reason for the stronger association between Mosher sex guilt, compared to IAT sex guilt, and outcome variables.
","abstract_html":"<p>Sex guilt is a generalized expectancy for self-mediated punishment for violating or anticipating violating standards of proper sexual conduct. Our current knowledge about sex guilt is primarily achieved through using explicit measures, particularly the widely used Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory. Research has shown that explicit sex guilt can predict many sexual behaviors such as sexual activity, number of sexual partners, and condom use. Responses on explicit measures, however, are influenced by dissimulation and social desirability, especially when assessing socially sensitive domains such as sexual attitudes. The present study hypothesized that adding implicit sex guilt as a second predictor to the Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory would significantly improve the prediction of sexual behaviors. An Implicit Association Test (IAT) was created for the purposes of this study. The IAT consisted of two dimensions: pictorial and lexical. For the pictorial section, the study contrasted the target category of sex with the more neutral category of exercise. The lexical dimensions were guilt-innocent. Two hundred and twenty five female and 48 male undergraduate students participated in the study. IAT and Mosher Sex Guilt scales were correlated (r = .25) which provided some support for the convergent validity of IAT sex guilt. Regression and correlation analyses indicated that IAT sex guilt was associated with whether or not participants were sexually active, the extent to which participants were satisfied with their first sexual intercourse, frequency of engaging in sexual intercourse, and contraceptive use. However, results on multiple regression and correlation indicated that when IAT was added to the model as a second predictor, it only improved the prediction of whether or not participants were sexually active. Overall, Mosher sex guilt demonstrated better convergent validity compared to IAT sex guilt and the results did not support the idea of IAT sex guilt increasing the amount of variance accounted for in sexual behaviors compared to the Mosher scale alone. The implementation of explicit measures for assessing outcome variables could be a reason for the stronger association between Mosher sex guilt, compared to IAT sex guilt, and outcome variables.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Asadzadeh Totonchi, Delaram"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Louis H. Janda","Valerian Derlega","Kristin Heron"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-10-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2015-10-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:33:54Z","subjects":["Sex guilt","Sexual conduct","Explicit measures","Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory","Implicit Association Test","IAT","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9781339346489"],"render_values":[{"text":"9781339346489","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/16","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Louis H. Janda","Valerian Derlega","Kristin Heron"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Asadzadeh Totonchi, Delaram"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-01-21T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Sex guilt","Sexual conduct","Explicit measures","Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory","Implicit Association Test","IAT","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9781339346489","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/16"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Sex guilt is a generalized expectancy for self-mediated punishment for violating or anticipating violating standards of proper sexual conduct. Our current knowledge about sex guilt is primarily achieved through using explicit measures, particularly the widely used Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory. Research has shown that explicit sex guilt can predict many sexual behaviors such as sexual activity, number of sexual partners, and condom use. Responses on explicit measures, however, are influenced by dissimulation and social desirability, especially when assessing socially sensitive domains such as sexual attitudes. The present study hypothesized that adding implicit sex guilt as a second predictor to the Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory would significantly improve the prediction of sexual behaviors. An Implicit Association Test (IAT) was created for the purposes of this study. The IAT consisted of two dimensions: pictorial and lexical. For the pictorial section, the study contrasted the target category of sex with the more neutral category of exercise. The lexical dimensions were guilt-innocent. Two hundred and twenty five female and 48 male undergraduate students participated in the study. IAT and Mosher Sex Guilt scales were correlated (r = .25) which provided some support for the convergent validity of IAT sex guilt. Regression and correlation analyses indicated that IAT sex guilt was associated with whether or not participants were sexually active, the extent to which participants were satisfied with their first sexual intercourse, frequency of engaging in sexual intercourse, and contraceptive use. However, results on multiple regression and correlation indicated that when IAT was added to the model as a second predictor, it only improved the prediction of whether or not participants were sexually active. Overall, Mosher sex guilt demonstrated better convergent validity compared to IAT sex guilt and the results did not support the idea of IAT sex guilt increasing the amount of variance accounted for in sexual behaviors compared to the Mosher scale alone. The implementation of explicit measures for assessing outcome variables could be a reason for the stronger association between Mosher sex guilt, compared to IAT sex guilt, and outcome variables.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparing Implicit and Explicit Measures of Sex Guilt in Predicting Sexual Behavior"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Louis H. Janda","Valerian Derlega","Kristin Heron"],"dc:creator":["Asadzadeh Totonchi, Delaram"],"dc:date.available":["2016-01-21T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Sex guilt is a generalized expectancy for self-mediated punishment for violating or anticipating violating standards of proper sexual conduct. Our current knowledge about sex guilt is primarily achieved through using explicit measures, particularly the widely used Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory. Research has shown that explicit sex guilt can predict many sexual behaviors such as sexual activity, number of sexual partners, and condom use. Responses on explicit measures, however, are influenced by dissimulation and social desirability, especially when assessing socially sensitive domains such as sexual attitudes. The present study hypothesized that adding implicit sex guilt as a second predictor to the Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory would significantly improve the prediction of sexual behaviors. An Implicit Association Test (IAT) was created for the purposes of this study. The IAT consisted of two dimensions: pictorial and lexical. For the pictorial section, the study contrasted the target category of sex with the more neutral category of exercise. The lexical dimensions were guilt-innocent. Two hundred and twenty five female and 48 male undergraduate students participated in the study. IAT and Mosher Sex Guilt scales were correlated (r = .25) which provided some support for the convergent validity of IAT sex guilt. Regression and correlation analyses indicated that IAT sex guilt was associated with whether or not participants were sexually active, the extent to which participants were satisfied with their first sexual intercourse, frequency of engaging in sexual intercourse, and contraceptive use. However, results on multiple regression and correlation indicated that when IAT was added to the model as a second predictor, it only improved the prediction of whether or not participants were sexually active. Overall, Mosher sex guilt demonstrated better convergent validity compared to IAT sex guilt and the results did not support the idea of IAT sex guilt increasing the amount of variance accounted for in sexual behaviors compared to the Mosher scale alone. The implementation of explicit measures for assessing outcome variables could be a reason for the stronger association between Mosher sex guilt, compared to IAT sex guilt, and outcome variables.
"],"dc:identifier":["9781339346489","https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/16"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
"],"dc:subject":["Sex guilt","Sexual conduct","Explicit measures","Mosher Sex Guilt Inventory","Implicit Association Test","IAT","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Psychology"],"dc:title":["Comparing Implicit and Explicit Measures of Sex Guilt in Predicting Sexual Behavior"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:33:54Z"}