{"id":{"repo_id":"nus","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarbank.nus.edu.sg:10635/134697"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/nus/oai:scholarbank.nus.edu.sg:10635/134697","repository":{"repo_id":"nus","name":"National University of Singapore","base_url":"https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THE INTERGROUP SENSITIVITY EFFECT: THE MODERATING ROLE OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION, POWER, AND CATEGORY DIFFERENTIATION","abstract":"Past research has demonstrated that people are more receptive to group-directed criticism made by an ingroup member as compared to the same criticism made by an outgroup member – the intergroup sensitivity effect (ISE). Employing a minimal group paradigm, the present research examined motivational factors (social exclusion, lack of power) and social-cognitive factors (category differentiation) as moderators of the ISE. Across two experiments, it was shown that socially included (Experiment 1) and control condition participants (Experiment 2) displayed the ISE, regardless of whether they perceived category (group) boundaries to be distinct or not. On the other hand, for socially excluded participants (Experiment 1) and participants primed with a lack of power (Experiment 2), the ISE was qualified by category differentiation, whereby ISE was stronger amongst those who perceived ingroup-outgroup boundaries to be distinct. Implications of these findings and possible future directions are discussed.","abstract_html":"Past research has demonstrated that people are more receptive to group-directed criticism made by an ingroup member as compared to the same criticism made by an outgroup member – the intergroup sensitivity effect (ISE). Employing a minimal group paradigm, the present research examined motivational factors (social exclusion, lack of power) and social-cognitive factors (category differentiation) as moderators of the ISE. Across two experiments, it was shown that socially included (Experiment 1) and control condition participants (Experiment 2) displayed the ISE, regardless of whether they perceived category (group) boundaries to be distinct or not. On the other hand, for socially excluded participants (Experiment 1) and participants primed with a lack of power (Experiment 2), the ISE was qualified by category differentiation, whereby ISE was stronger amongst those who perceived ingroup-outgroup boundaries to be distinct. Implications of these findings and possible future directions are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["TAN HUI MIN JASMINE"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-08-17","date_published":"2016-08-17","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:30:34Z","subjects":["intergroup sensitivity effect, group-directed criticism, social exclusion, power, category differentiation, minimal groups"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":null,"outbound_label":null,"outbound_source":null},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["TAN HUI MIN JASMINE"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2016-08-17"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/134697"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["intergroup sensitivity effect, group-directed criticism, social exclusion, power, category differentiation, minimal groups"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/bitstreams/19f88ee7-a675-4786-aeb3-ea33d234433d/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Past research has demonstrated that people are more receptive to group-directed criticism made by an ingroup member as compared to the same criticism made by an outgroup member – the intergroup sensitivity effect (ISE). Employing a minimal group paradigm, the present research examined motivational factors (social exclusion, lack of power) and social-cognitive factors (category differentiation) as moderators of the ISE. Across two experiments, it was shown that socially included (Experiment 1) and control condition participants (Experiment 2) displayed the ISE, regardless of whether they perceived category (group) boundaries to be distinct or not. On the other hand, for socially excluded participants (Experiment 1) and participants primed with a lack of power (Experiment 2), the ISE was qualified by category differentiation, whereby ISE was stronger amongst those who perceived ingroup-outgroup boundaries to be distinct. Implications of these findings and possible future directions are discussed."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["01d6ddfe8c6a2948c94c5b5c3d78e39a","9860e6741cea084f2ed1c3c79c505cc3"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THE INTERGROUP SENSITIVITY EFFECT: THE MODERATING ROLE OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION, POWER, AND CATEGORY DIFFERENTIATION"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["TAN HUI MIN JASMINE"],"dc:date.issued":["2016-08-17"],"dc:description.abstract":["Past research has demonstrated that people are more receptive to group-directed criticism made by an ingroup member as compared to the same criticism made by an outgroup member – the intergroup sensitivity effect (ISE). Employing a minimal group paradigm, the present research examined motivational factors (social exclusion, lack of power) and social-cognitive factors (category differentiation) as moderators of the ISE. Across two experiments, it was shown that socially included (Experiment 1) and control condition participants (Experiment 2) displayed the ISE, regardless of whether they perceived category (group) boundaries to be distinct or not. On the other hand, for socially excluded participants (Experiment 1) and participants primed with a lack of power (Experiment 2), the ISE was qualified by category differentiation, whereby ISE was stronger amongst those who perceived ingroup-outgroup boundaries to be distinct. Implications of these findings and possible future directions are discussed."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["01d6ddfe8c6a2948c94c5b5c3d78e39a","9860e6741cea084f2ed1c3c79c505cc3"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/bitstreams/19f88ee7-a675-4786-aeb3-ea33d234433d/download"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/134697"],"dc:subject":["intergroup sensitivity effect, group-directed criticism, social exclusion, power, category differentiation, minimal groups"],"dc:title":["A FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THE INTERGROUP SENSITIVITY EFFECT: THE MODERATING ROLE OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION, POWER, AND CATEGORY DIFFERENTIATION"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:30:34Z"}