{"id":{"repo_id":"nps","oai_identifier":"oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/74018"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/nps/oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/74018","repository":{"repo_id":"nps","name":"Naval Postgraduate School","base_url":"https://calhoun.nps.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY STANDARDS: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE VERSUS PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE","abstract":"Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition programs and professionals have been under scrutiny for years. Direction has been provided, over time, to adopt civilian program management practices within DoD. The Project Management Institute, Inc. (PMI) sets and manages civilian program management standards and certification. This study assesses DoD alignment and/​or progress in adopting PMI standards. This study is primarily focused on portfolio management competency standards; however, the research requires that some foundational information, prior study results, and discussion of deltas between DoD concepts or documentation and practical application be addressed. This study is a follow-on or update to a 2021 Naval Postgraduate School thesis on the same topic (Gap Analysis of Department of Defense Program Management Competency Standards in Preparation for the Shift to Portfolio Management in Defense Acquisitions). In both this study and previous studies, gap analysis methodology (both qualitative and quantitative approaches) was applied. The research from 2021 found a 41% alignment with industry standards. This study found an increased alignment, closer to 60%. This study reinforces recommendations from the 2021 study and makes an overall recommendation that would result in complete alignment between DoD standards and PMI, the industry standard for portfolio management.","abstract_html":"Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition programs and professionals have been under scrutiny for years. Direction has been provided, over time, to adopt civilian program management practices within DoD. The Project Management Institute, Inc. (PMI) sets and manages civilian program management standards and certification. This study assesses DoD alignment and/​or progress in adopting PMI standards. This study is primarily focused on portfolio management competency standards; however, the research requires that some foundational information, prior study results, and discussion of deltas between DoD concepts or documentation and practical application be addressed. This study is a follow-on or update to a 2021 Naval Postgraduate School thesis on the same topic (Gap Analysis of Department of Defense Program Management Competency Standards in Preparation for the Shift to Portfolio Management in Defense Acquisitions). In both this study and previous studies, gap analysis methodology (both qualitative and quantitative approaches) was applied. The research from 2021 found a 41% alignment with industry standards. This study found an increased alignment, closer to 60%. This study reinforces recommendations from the 2021 study and makes an overall recommendation that would result in complete alignment between DoD standards and PMI, the industry standard for portfolio management.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bobulinski, Michael S."],"institution":"Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Department of Defense Management (DDM)","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Mortlock, Robert F."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-06","date_published":"2025-06","updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:26:05Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":["This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10945/74018","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Mortlock, Robert F."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Department of Defense Management (DDM)"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bobulinski, Michael S."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-09-08T15:23:42Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-09-08T15:23:42Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025-06"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10945/74018"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Includes Supplementary Material"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition programs and professionals have been under scrutiny for years. Direction has been provided, over time, to adopt civilian program management practices within DoD. The Project Management Institute, Inc. (PMI) sets and manages civilian program management standards and certification. This study assesses DoD alignment and/​or progress in adopting PMI standards. This study is primarily focused on portfolio management competency standards; however, the research requires that some foundational information, prior study results, and discussion of deltas between DoD concepts or documentation and practical application be addressed. This study is a follow-on or update to a 2021 Naval Postgraduate School thesis on the same topic (Gap Analysis of Department of Defense Program Management Competency Standards in Preparation for the Shift to Portfolio Management in Defense Acquisitions). In both this study and previous studies, gap analysis methodology (both qualitative and quantitative approaches) was applied. The research from 2021 found a 41% alignment with industry standards. This study found an increased alignment, closer to 60%. This study reinforces recommendations from the 2021 study and makes an overall recommendation that would result in complete alignment between DoD standards and PMI, the industry standard for portfolio management."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY STANDARDS: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE VERSUS PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Mortlock, Robert F."],"dc:contributor.department":["Department of Defense Management (DDM)"],"dc:creator":["Bobulinski, Michael S."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-09-08T15:23:42Z"],"dc:date.available":["2025-09-08T15:23:42Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2025-06"],"dc:description":["Includes Supplementary Material"],"dc:description.abstract":["Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition programs and professionals have been under scrutiny for years. Direction has been provided, over time, to adopt civilian program management practices within DoD. The Project Management Institute, Inc. (PMI) sets and manages civilian program management standards and certification. This study assesses DoD alignment and/​or progress in adopting PMI standards. This study is primarily focused on portfolio management competency standards; however, the research requires that some foundational information, prior study results, and discussion of deltas between DoD concepts or documentation and practical application be addressed. This study is a follow-on or update to a 2021 Naval Postgraduate School thesis on the same topic (Gap Analysis of Department of Defense Program Management Competency Standards in Preparation for the Shift to Portfolio Management in Defense Acquisitions). In both this study and previous studies, gap analysis methodology (both qualitative and quantitative approaches) was applied. The research from 2021 found a 41% alignment with industry standards. This study found an increased alignment, closer to 60%. This study reinforces recommendations from the 2021 study and makes an overall recommendation that would result in complete alignment between DoD standards and PMI, the industry standard for portfolio management."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10945/74018"],"dc:publisher":["Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School"],"dc:rights":["This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States."],"dc:title":["PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY STANDARDS: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE VERSUS PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:26:05Z"}