{"id":{"repo_id":"nps","oai_identifier":"oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/47917"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/nps/oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/47917","repository":{"repo_id":"nps","name":"Naval Postgraduate School","base_url":"https://calhoun.nps.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Potential cost savings and cost avoidances associated with security cooperation training programs","abstract":"In this project, I examine the current security cooperation and assistance efforts in the U.S. Africa Command area of responsibility with a particular focus on training of foreign military forces under 10 U.S. Code § 2282. Specifically, I analyze whether the cost of such training programs is cheaper using contracted personnel versus uniformed military personnel. The costs of contractor-provided training come from the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. Using the Department of Defense’s Financial Management Regulation, I priced the contractor provided training as if uniformed personnel had performed it to estimate the cost of provision using military personnel. Comparing the two estimates, I found that, in all cases, the contractor-provided price was significantly higher than the cost of uniformed personnel. While this study suggests that contracted services are not always cheaper than using military personnel, future research should incorporate better estimates of the opportunity cost of using uniformed personnel that may change the cost calculations.","abstract_html":"In this project, I examine the current security cooperation and assistance efforts in the U.S. Africa Command area of responsibility with a particular focus on training of foreign military forces under 10 U.S. Code § 2282. Specifically, I analyze whether the cost of such training programs is cheaper using contracted personnel versus uniformed military personnel. The costs of contractor-provided training come from the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. Using the Department of Defense’s Financial Management Regulation, I priced the contractor provided training as if uniformed personnel had performed it to estimate the cost of provision using military personnel. Comparing the two estimates, I found that, in all cases, the contractor-provided price was significantly higher than the cost of uniformed personnel. While this study suggests that contracted services are not always cheaper than using military personnel, future research should incorporate better estimates of the opportunity cost of using uniformed personnel that may change the cost calculations.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Carroll, Michael J."],"institution":"Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Hartmann, Latika","Sullivan, Ryan"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-12","date_published":"2015-12","updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:25:53Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":["This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10945/47917","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Hartmann, Latika","Sullivan, Ryan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Carroll, Michael J."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2016-02-17T18:38:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-02-17T18:38:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2015-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10945/47917"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["MBA Professional Report"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In this project, I examine the current security cooperation and assistance efforts in the U.S. Africa Command area of responsibility with a particular focus on training of foreign military forces under 10 U.S. Code § 2282. Specifically, I analyze whether the cost of such training programs is cheaper using contracted personnel versus uniformed military personnel. The costs of contractor-provided training come from the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. Using the Department of Defense’s Financial Management Regulation, I priced the contractor provided training as if uniformed personnel had performed it to estimate the cost of provision using military personnel. Comparing the two estimates, I found that, in all cases, the contractor-provided price was significantly higher than the cost of uniformed personnel. While this study suggests that contracted services are not always cheaper than using military personnel, future research should incorporate better estimates of the opportunity cost of using uniformed personnel that may change the cost calculations."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Potential cost savings and cost avoidances associated with security cooperation training programs"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Hartmann, Latika","Sullivan, Ryan"],"dc:creator":["Carroll, Michael J."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2016-02-17T18:38:35Z"],"dc:date.available":["2016-02-17T18:38:35Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2015-12"],"dc:description":["MBA Professional Report"],"dc:description.abstract":["In this project, I examine the current security cooperation and assistance efforts in the U.S. Africa Command area of responsibility with a particular focus on training of foreign military forces under 10 U.S. Code § 2282. Specifically, I analyze whether the cost of such training programs is cheaper using contracted personnel versus uniformed military personnel. The costs of contractor-provided training come from the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. Using the Department of Defense’s Financial Management Regulation, I priced the contractor provided training as if uniformed personnel had performed it to estimate the cost of provision using military personnel. Comparing the two estimates, I found that, in all cases, the contractor-provided price was significantly higher than the cost of uniformed personnel. While this study suggests that contracted services are not always cheaper than using military personnel, future research should incorporate better estimates of the opportunity cost of using uniformed personnel that may change the cost calculations."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10945/47917"],"dc:publisher":["Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School"],"dc:rights":["This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States."],"dc:title":["Potential cost savings and cost avoidances associated with security cooperation training programs"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T20:25:53Z"}