Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
An historical comparison between the Southern secession movement of 1860 and the Soviet secession movements of today
Abstract
dc:description.abstractThis thesis uses an historical interpretation of the Southern secession movement of 1860 in order to formulate a secession theory consisting of three separate elements: 1) the growth of political faction; 2) a characteristic of the factional clash which renders the resulting crisis particularly unsuitable for constitutional or governmental adjudication; and 3) the existence of a subordinate governmental infrastructure, controlled by the minority faction, which can be used to effect a secession movement. An historical review of the Southern secession is undertaken in light of the above secession theory in order to argue for the theory's validity; then, the theory is applied to the various Soviet secession movements with a view towards proposing U.S. policy options.
Degree
thesis:*- Department dc:contributor.department
- National Security Affairs (NSA)
- Grantor dc:publisher
- Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
- Year dc:date.issued
- 1992
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Donner, Michael L., Sr.
- Advisors dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Teti, Frank M.
- Minott-Kennedy, Rodney
Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
- Language dc:language.iso
- en_US
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- https://hdl.handle.net/10945/23690
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:calhoun.nps.edu:10945/23690