{"id":{"repo_id":"nodak","oai_identifier":"oai:commons.und.edu:theses-2444"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/nodak/oai:commons.und.edu:theses-2444","repository":{"repo_id":"nodak","name":"University of North Dakota","base_url":"https://commons.und.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Classifier constructions as procedural signs in American Sign Language","abstract":"<p>In this thesis I will be analyzing what has typically, in sign language literature, been termed classifiers and classifier constructions. I will be approaching them from the pragmatic perspective by applying Relevance Theory to explain their usage as representations that manipulate and modify their referents. The data comes from texts signed by native users of American Sign Language and are from academic lectures, interviews, narrative, and course curriculum. I have found that Relevance Theory adequately describes why and when classifiers constructions are used and that they function as a procedural referring expression.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;In this thesis I will be analyzing what has typically, in sign language literature, been termed classifiers and classifier constructions. I will be approaching them from the pragmatic perspective by applying Relevance Theory to explain their usage as representations that manipulate and modify their referents. The data comes from texts signed by native users of American Sign Language and are from academic lectures, interviews, narrative, and course curriculum. I have found that Relevance Theory adequately describes why and when classifiers constructions are used and that they function as a procedural referring expression.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jones Ii, Stephen Perry"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts (MA)","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Linguistics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Regina Blass"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2013-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:26:30Z","subjects":["ad hoc concepts","American Sign Language","Classifier Constructions","Procedural","Referring Expression","Relevance Theory","Linguistics","Sign Languages"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://commons.und.edu/theses/1443","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Regina Blass"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jones Ii, Stephen Perry"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Linguistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (MA)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["ad hoc concepts","American Sign Language","Classifier Constructions","Procedural","Referring Expression","Relevance Theory","Linguistics","Sign Languages"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://commons.und.edu/theses/1443"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>In this thesis I will be analyzing what has typically, in sign language literature, been termed classifiers and classifier constructions. I will be approaching them from the pragmatic perspective by applying Relevance Theory to explain their usage as representations that manipulate and modify their referents. The data comes from texts signed by native users of American Sign Language and are from academic lectures, interviews, narrative, and course curriculum. I have found that Relevance Theory adequately describes why and when classifiers constructions are used and that they function as a procedural referring expression.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Classifier constructions as procedural signs in American Sign Language"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Regina Blass"],"dc:creator":["Jones Ii, Stephen Perry"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>In this thesis I will be analyzing what has typically, in sign language literature, been termed classifiers and classifier constructions. I will be approaching them from the pragmatic perspective by applying Relevance Theory to explain their usage as representations that manipulate and modify their referents. The data comes from texts signed by native users of American Sign Language and are from academic lectures, interviews, narrative, and course curriculum. I have found that Relevance Theory adequately describes why and when classifiers constructions are used and that they function as a procedural referring expression.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://commons.und.edu/theses/1443"],"dc:subject":["ad hoc concepts","American Sign Language","Classifier Constructions","Procedural","Referring Expression","Relevance Theory","Linguistics","Sign Languages"],"dc:title":["Classifier constructions as procedural signs in American Sign Language"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Linguistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (MA)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:26:30Z"}