{"id":{"repo_id":"nodak","oai_identifier":"oai:commons.und.edu:theses-2076"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/nodak/oai:commons.und.edu:theses-2076","repository":{"repo_id":"nodak","name":"University of North Dakota","base_url":"https://commons.und.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Psychometrics and test-enhanced learning in a patient-centered learning curriculum","abstract":"<p>Validity and reliability of scores obtained on Multiple-choice questions (MCQs), as well as the benefits of test-enhanced learning, have been of interest to medical educator scholars. Presented in this dissertation are four composite studies on these themes. The following hypotheses were tested:</p> <p>1. Increased MCQ distractor functioning increases the validity and reliability of obtained scores.</p> <p>2. Correction of item writing flaws (along with enhancement of tested cognitive level) and replacement or removal of non-functioning distractors equally improves psychometric characteristics of MCQs.</p> <p>3. Repeated testing via free-response items enhances the retention of knowledge of human anatomy, compared with repeated or once-testing via multiplechoice questions.</p> <p>Validity and reliability of scores obtained on MCQs was noted to rise as a result of increased MCQ distractor functioning, discrimination amongst high and low performing students was found to be equally improved via removal of flaws and nonfunctioning distractors, and short-term (up to four weeks) retention of human anatomy knowledge was found to be enhanced by repeated testing via free-response questions.</p> <p>Raising MCQ quality by addressing flaws and low distractor functioning, and using nostakes repeated retrieval practice, is advised for improvement in the assessment and learning practices in pre-clinical medical education.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Validity and reliability of scores obtained on Multiple-choice questions (MCQs), as well as the benefits of test-enhanced learning, have been of interest to medical educator scholars. Presented in this dissertation are four composite studies on these themes. The following hypotheses were tested:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;1. Increased MCQ distractor functioning increases the validity and reliability of obtained scores.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;2. Correction of item writing flaws (along with enhancement of tested cognitive level) and replacement or removal of non-functioning distractors equally improves psychometric characteristics of MCQs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;3. Repeated testing via free-response items enhances the retention of knowledge of human anatomy, compared with repeated or once-testing via multiplechoice questions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Validity and reliability of scores obtained on MCQs was noted to rise as a result of increased MCQ distractor functioning, discrimination amongst high and low performing students was found to be equally improved via removal of flaws and nonfunctioning distractors, and short-term (up to four weeks) retention of human anatomy knowledge was found to be enhanced by repeated testing via free-response questions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Raising MCQ quality by addressing flaws and low distractor functioning, and using nostakes repeated retrieval practice, is advised for improvement in the assessment and learning practices in pre-clinical medical education.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ali, Syed Haris"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Biology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Kenneth G. Ruit"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-12-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2014-12-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:26:03Z","subjects":["Multiple-choice examinations","Anatomy -- Study and teaching (Higher)","Philosophy"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://commons.und.edu/theses/1074","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Kenneth G. Ruit"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ali, Syed Haris"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-03-06T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Biology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Multiple-choice examinations","Anatomy -- Study and teaching (Higher)","Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://commons.und.edu/theses/1074"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Validity and reliability of scores obtained on Multiple-choice questions (MCQs), as well as the benefits of test-enhanced learning, have been of interest to medical educator scholars. Presented in this dissertation are four composite studies on these themes. The following hypotheses were tested:</p> <p>1. Increased MCQ distractor functioning increases the validity and reliability of obtained scores.</p> <p>2. Correction of item writing flaws (along with enhancement of tested cognitive level) and replacement or removal of non-functioning distractors equally improves psychometric characteristics of MCQs.</p> <p>3. Repeated testing via free-response items enhances the retention of knowledge of human anatomy, compared with repeated or once-testing via multiplechoice questions.</p> <p>Validity and reliability of scores obtained on MCQs was noted to rise as a result of increased MCQ distractor functioning, discrimination amongst high and low performing students was found to be equally improved via removal of flaws and nonfunctioning distractors, and short-term (up to four weeks) retention of human anatomy knowledge was found to be enhanced by repeated testing via free-response questions.</p> <p>Raising MCQ quality by addressing flaws and low distractor functioning, and using nostakes repeated retrieval practice, is advised for improvement in the assessment and learning practices in pre-clinical medical education.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Psychometrics and test-enhanced learning in a patient-centered learning curriculum"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Kenneth G. Ruit"],"dc:creator":["Ali, Syed Haris"],"dc:date.available":["2019-03-06T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Validity and reliability of scores obtained on Multiple-choice questions (MCQs), as well as the benefits of test-enhanced learning, have been of interest to medical educator scholars. Presented in this dissertation are four composite studies on these themes. The following hypotheses were tested:</p> <p>1. Increased MCQ distractor functioning increases the validity and reliability of obtained scores.</p> <p>2. Correction of item writing flaws (along with enhancement of tested cognitive level) and replacement or removal of non-functioning distractors equally improves psychometric characteristics of MCQs.</p> <p>3. Repeated testing via free-response items enhances the retention of knowledge of human anatomy, compared with repeated or once-testing via multiplechoice questions.</p> <p>Validity and reliability of scores obtained on MCQs was noted to rise as a result of increased MCQ distractor functioning, discrimination amongst high and low performing students was found to be equally improved via removal of flaws and nonfunctioning distractors, and short-term (up to four weeks) retention of human anatomy knowledge was found to be enhanced by repeated testing via free-response questions.</p> <p>Raising MCQ quality by addressing flaws and low distractor functioning, and using nostakes repeated retrieval practice, is advised for improvement in the assessment and learning practices in pre-clinical medical education.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://commons.und.edu/theses/1074"],"dc:subject":["Multiple-choice examinations","Anatomy -- Study and teaching (Higher)","Philosophy"],"dc:title":["Psychometrics and test-enhanced learning in a patient-centered learning curriculum"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Biology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:26:03Z"}