{"id":{"repo_id":"ncsu","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.lib.ncsu.edu:1840.16/869"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ncsu/oai:repository.lib.ncsu.edu:1840.16/869","repository":{"repo_id":"ncsu","name":"North Carolina State University","base_url":"https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Design Without Make: A feasible direction for American Technology Education","abstract":"In this study, the researcher examined the effects of STEM and engineering design research, termed Design-Without-Make, which was undertaken at NC State University in 2009 in an NC high school. The hybrid quantitative, qualitative case study was developed with the purpose of capturing what new technological learning occurs and how the new pedagogical learning benefits the technological learner. The main purpose of this study was: 1) to assess whether students who participate in design-without-make activities achieve learning outcomes as successfully as or better than students of traditional design-with-make activities; 2) to determine student and teacher attitudes towards design-without-make activities within technology education. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate the relationship between instruction and the change in pre- and posttest scores between groups. The study consisted of 27 participants, with the control group having 10 and the treatment group having 17 participants. The grand mean score from both groups came to 14.37 (SD=5.43). The assessment used has a standard error of 1.05. The posttest scores ranged from 4 to 22 out of a possible score of 22. With F(11,15)=2.04, p=.05, it was found there were no significant differences between the control and treatment posttest scores.","abstract_html":"In this study, the researcher examined the effects of STEM and engineering design research, termed Design-Without-Make, which was undertaken at NC State University in 2009 in an NC high school. The hybrid quantitative, qualitative case study was developed with the purpose of capturing what new technological learning occurs and how the new pedagogical learning benefits the technological learner. The main purpose of this study was: 1) to assess whether students who participate in design-without-make activities achieve learning outcomes as successfully as or better than students of traditional design-with-make activities; 2) to determine student and teacher attitudes towards design-without-make activities within technology education. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate the relationship between instruction and the change in pre- and posttest scores between groups. The study consisted of 27 participants, with the control group having 10 and the treatment group having 17 participants. The grand mean score from both groups came to 14.37 (SD=5.43). The assessment used has a standard error of 1.05. The posttest scores ranged from 4 to 22 out of a possible score of 22. With F(11,15)=2.04, p=.05, it was found there were no significant differences between the control and treatment posttest scores.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Thompson, Timothy B."],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Terri E. Varnado, Committee Chair","Brian Matthews, Committee Member","W.J. Haynie, Committee Member"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-11-23","date_published":"2009-11-23","updated_at":"2026-08-21T22:21:56Z","subjects":["Pedagogy","design","make","Project Based Learning","building","Technology Education","Engineering","Problem Solving","Methodology"],"languages":[],"rights":["I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-08102009-114247"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-08102009-114247","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/869","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"source_record":{"url":"https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=dim&identifier=oai%3Arepository.lib.ncsu.edu%3A1840.16%2F869","prefix":"dim"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Terri E. Varnado, Committee Chair","Brian Matthews, Committee Member","W.J. Haynie, Committee Member"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Thompson, Timothy B."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2010-04-02T17:59:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2010-04-02T17:59:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2009-11-23"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Pedagogy","design","make","Project Based Learning","building","Technology Education","Engineering","Problem Solving","Methodology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-08102009-114247"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/869"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["North Carolina State University Theses Mathematics, Science & Technology Education.;North Carolina State University Theses Mathematics, Science & Technology Education."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In this study, the researcher examined the effects of STEM and engineering design research, termed Design-Without-Make, which was undertaken at NC State University in 2009 in an NC high school. The hybrid quantitative, qualitative case study was developed with the purpose of capturing what new technological learning occurs and how the new pedagogical learning benefits the technological learner. The main purpose of this study was: 1) to assess whether students who participate in design-without-make activities achieve learning outcomes as successfully as or better than students of traditional design-with-make activities; 2) to determine student and teacher attitudes towards design-without-make activities within technology education. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate the relationship between instruction and the change in pre- and posttest scores between groups. The study consisted of 27 participants, with the control group having 10 and the treatment group having 17 participants. The grand mean score from both groups came to 14.37 (SD=5.43). The assessment used has a standard error of 1.05. The posttest scores ranged from 4 to 22 out of a possible score of 22. With F(11,15)=2.04, p=.05, it was found there were no significant differences between the control and treatment posttest scores."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Thesis (M.S.)--North Carolina State University."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Design Without Make: A feasible direction for American Technology Education"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Terri E. Varnado, Committee Chair","Brian Matthews, Committee Member","W.J. Haynie, Committee Member"],"dc:creator":["Thompson, Timothy B."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2010-04-02T17:59:00Z"],"dc:date.available":["2010-04-02T17:59:00Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2009-11-23"],"dc:description":["North Carolina State University Theses Mathematics, Science & Technology Education.;North Carolina State University Theses Mathematics, Science & Technology Education."],"dc:description.abstract":["In this study, the researcher examined the effects of STEM and engineering design research, termed Design-Without-Make, which was undertaken at NC State University in 2009 in an NC high school. The hybrid quantitative, qualitative case study was developed with the purpose of capturing what new technological learning occurs and how the new pedagogical learning benefits the technological learner. The main purpose of this study was: 1) to assess whether students who participate in design-without-make activities achieve learning outcomes as successfully as or better than students of traditional design-with-make activities; 2) to determine student and teacher attitudes towards design-without-make activities within technology education. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate the relationship between instruction and the change in pre- and posttest scores between groups. The study consisted of 27 participants, with the control group having 10 and the treatment group having 17 participants. The grand mean score from both groups came to 14.37 (SD=5.43). The assessment used has a standard error of 1.05. The posttest scores ranged from 4 to 22 out of a possible score of 22. With F(11,15)=2.04, p=.05, it was found there were no significant differences between the control and treatment posttest scores."],"dc:format":["Thesis (M.S.)--North Carolina State University."],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-08102009-114247"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/869"],"dc:rights":["I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report."],"dc:subject":["Pedagogy","design","make","Project Based Learning","building","Technology Education","Engineering","Problem Solving","Methodology"],"dc:title":["Design Without Make: A feasible direction for American Technology Education"]},"updated_at":"2026-08-21T22:21:56Z"}