What Works in Organizing? Applying Social Movement Theory to Building Labor Unions in North Carolina

Social movement theorists have offered various explanations for participation by individuals in social movements. Two theories, resource mobilization theory and collective identity theory, propose very different motivating factors. Resource mobilization theory emphasizes a rational-choice decision-making process for potential participants, while collective identity theory states that individuals participate in social movements in order to achieve a feeling of solidarity and commitment to a group. By using interviews with individuals involved in the labor movement in North Carolina, I have examined these two perspectives to determine their applicability to the experiences of labor movement participants. The interview responses of workers, organizers, and union leaders in several contrasting unions regarding the process of joining and maintaining membership in unions suggest a sequencing process that features elements of both theories. In particular, respondents note the influence of material incentives in the recruitment process, including promises of better pay and grievance representation. Subsequently, generating solidarity and feelings of commitment and responsibility to the group often encourage more active and long-term union membership. These responses must be placed in the context of North Carolina's restrictive laws affecting unionism, the state's extremely low union density, and long-term elite resistance to unionizing action. This sequencing process of approaching unorganized workers initially with material incentives, and then working to develop a sense of solidarity among union members may be a function of this hostile environment: workers who are unfamiliar with and even skeptical of unions cannot initially be attracted by the appeals of solidarity. Although neither resource mobilization nor collective identity theory appears accurately to describe the experience of joining the labor movement in North Carolina on its own, combining elements of both theories offers a more complete picture of why and how individuals decide to join and participate.

Author dc:creator

• Twiddy, Susan Elizabeth

Advisors dc:contributor.advisor

• Dr. Jeffrey Leiter, Committee Chair
• Dr. Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Committee Member
• Dr. Rick Della Fave, Committee Member

• organizing
• North Carolina
• social movement theory
• labor unions

Statement dc:rights

• I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Dc Identifier Other

etd-12162003-100940

OAI record oai:identifier

https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=dim&identifier=oai%3Arepository.lib.ncsu.edu%3A1840.16%2F276