{"id":{"repo_id":"ncsu","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.lib.ncsu.edu:1840.16/1973"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ncsu/oai:repository.lib.ncsu.edu:1840.16/1973","repository":{"repo_id":"ncsu","name":"North Carolina State University","base_url":"https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Exploring the Dimensionality of Performance in the Army Special Forces","abstract":"The purpose of this research was to explore the dimensionality of performance in the Army Special Forces (SF) using three separate data sources. A job analysis of the SF revealed 15 categories of performance common to all SF soldiers, in addition to 47 human attributes necessary to perform the behaviors associated with each category. A sample of SF soldiers was rated on their performance of the 15 categories using behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS). Furthermore, a panel of subject matter experts (SME) rated each performance dimension on its requirement for each of the human attributes. These two data sources served in the development of two sets of performance dimensions, based on respective factor and cluster analyses of the data. A third data source included job analyst sorting data of the 15 performance categories into predefined numbers of groups. This data was also cluster analyzed to produce a third set of performance dimensions. Research questions focused predominantly on the number of performance dimensions that would be derived from the three data sources and their interpretability, and the extent to which agreement would exist between the three sources. Agreement was determined based on an index of cluster overlap for comparing two cluster solutions. Three dimensions were chosen as most interpretable from the performance ratings and a four-dimension solution was chosen based on the analyses of the attribute requirement ratings. The clusters derived from the analyst sorting data were difficult to interpret. The highest level of cluster overlap existed between the clusters derived from the performance ratings and the attribute requirement ratings. Overall, the three-dimension conception of performance was chosen as most meaningful. The dimensions were interpreted and named General Soldiering, Citizenship Performance, and SF Specific Performance. Comparisons were made with previously developed performance models, and recommendations were made for future research.","abstract_html":"The purpose of this research was to explore the dimensionality of performance in the Army Special Forces (SF) using three separate data sources. A job analysis of the SF revealed 15 categories of performance common to all SF soldiers, in addition to 47 human attributes necessary to perform the behaviors associated with each category. A sample of SF soldiers was rated on their performance of the 15 categories using behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS). Furthermore, a panel of subject matter experts (SME) rated each performance dimension on its requirement for each of the human attributes. These two data sources served in the development of two sets of performance dimensions, based on respective factor and cluster analyses of the data. A third data source included job analyst sorting data of the 15 performance categories into predefined numbers of groups. This data was also cluster analyzed to produce a third set of performance dimensions. Research questions focused predominantly on the number of performance dimensions that would be derived from the three data sources and their interpretability, and the extent to which agreement would exist between the three sources. Agreement was determined based on an index of cluster overlap for comparing two cluster solutions. Three dimensions were chosen as most interpretable from the performance ratings and a four-dimension solution was chosen based on the analyses of the attribute requirement ratings. The clusters derived from the analyst sorting data were difficult to interpret. The highest level of cluster overlap existed between the clusters derived from the performance ratings and the attribute requirement ratings. Overall, the three-dimension conception of performance was chosen as most meaningful. The dimensions were interpreted and named General Soldiering, Citizenship Performance, and SF Specific Performance. Comparisons were made with previously developed performance models, and recommendations were made for future research.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ellington, James Kemp"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["M.A. Wilson, Committee Member","J.W. Cunningham, Committee Chair","D.W. Drewes, Committee Member"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2002,"date_issued":"2002-08-14","date_published":"2002-08-14","updated_at":"2026-08-21T22:21:56Z","subjects":["performance dimensions","Army Special Forces","cluster analysis","factor analysis","attribute requirements","Q-sort method"],"languages":[],"rights":["I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-08082002-171958"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-08082002-171958","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1973","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"source_record":{"url":"https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=dim&identifier=oai%3Arepository.lib.ncsu.edu%3A1840.16%2F1973","prefix":"dim"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["M.A. Wilson, Committee Member","J.W. Cunningham, Committee Chair","D.W. Drewes, Committee Member"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ellington, James Kemp"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2010-04-02T18:09:15Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2010-04-02T18:09:15Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2002-08-14"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["performance dimensions","Army Special Forces","cluster analysis","factor analysis","attribute requirements","Q-sort method"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-08082002-171958"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1973"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["North Carolina State University Theses Psychology."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this research was to explore the dimensionality of performance in the Army Special Forces (SF) using three separate data sources. A job analysis of the SF revealed 15 categories of performance common to all SF soldiers, in addition to 47 human attributes necessary to perform the behaviors associated with each category. A sample of SF soldiers was rated on their performance of the 15 categories using behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS). Furthermore, a panel of subject matter experts (SME) rated each performance dimension on its requirement for each of the human attributes. These two data sources served in the development of two sets of performance dimensions, based on respective factor and cluster analyses of the data. A third data source included job analyst sorting data of the 15 performance categories into predefined numbers of groups. This data was also cluster analyzed to produce a third set of performance dimensions. Research questions focused predominantly on the number of performance dimensions that would be derived from the three data sources and their interpretability, and the extent to which agreement would exist between the three sources. Agreement was determined based on an index of cluster overlap for comparing two cluster solutions. Three dimensions were chosen as most interpretable from the performance ratings and a four-dimension solution was chosen based on the analyses of the attribute requirement ratings. The clusters derived from the analyst sorting data were difficult to interpret. The highest level of cluster overlap existed between the clusters derived from the performance ratings and the attribute requirement ratings. Overall, the three-dimension conception of performance was chosen as most meaningful. The dimensions were interpreted and named General Soldiering, Citizenship Performance, and SF Specific Performance. Comparisons were made with previously developed performance models, and recommendations were made for future research."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Thesis (M.S.)--North Carolina State University."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Exploring the Dimensionality of Performance in the Army Special Forces"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["M.A. Wilson, Committee Member","J.W. Cunningham, Committee Chair","D.W. Drewes, Committee Member"],"dc:creator":["Ellington, James Kemp"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2010-04-02T18:09:15Z"],"dc:date.available":["2010-04-02T18:09:15Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2002-08-14"],"dc:description":["North Carolina State University Theses Psychology."],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this research was to explore the dimensionality of performance in the Army Special Forces (SF) using three separate data sources. A job analysis of the SF revealed 15 categories of performance common to all SF soldiers, in addition to 47 human attributes necessary to perform the behaviors associated with each category. A sample of SF soldiers was rated on their performance of the 15 categories using behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS). Furthermore, a panel of subject matter experts (SME) rated each performance dimension on its requirement for each of the human attributes. These two data sources served in the development of two sets of performance dimensions, based on respective factor and cluster analyses of the data. A third data source included job analyst sorting data of the 15 performance categories into predefined numbers of groups. This data was also cluster analyzed to produce a third set of performance dimensions. Research questions focused predominantly on the number of performance dimensions that would be derived from the three data sources and their interpretability, and the extent to which agreement would exist between the three sources. Agreement was determined based on an index of cluster overlap for comparing two cluster solutions. Three dimensions were chosen as most interpretable from the performance ratings and a four-dimension solution was chosen based on the analyses of the attribute requirement ratings. The clusters derived from the analyst sorting data were difficult to interpret. The highest level of cluster overlap existed between the clusters derived from the performance ratings and the attribute requirement ratings. Overall, the three-dimension conception of performance was chosen as most meaningful. The dimensions were interpreted and named General Soldiering, Citizenship Performance, and SF Specific Performance. Comparisons were made with previously developed performance models, and recommendations were made for future research."],"dc:format":["Thesis (M.S.)--North Carolina State University."],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-08082002-171958"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1973"],"dc:rights":["I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report."],"dc:subject":["performance dimensions","Army Special Forces","cluster analysis","factor analysis","attribute requirements","Q-sort method"],"dc:title":["Exploring the Dimensionality of Performance in the Army Special Forces"]},"updated_at":"2026-08-21T22:21:56Z"}