National-Louis University
Remote Neuropsychological Assessment: Does Mode of Administration Matter?
Abstract
dc:description.abstract<p>Neuropsychology relies heavily on standardization of administration to increase the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of an assessment instrument. The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly increased the need to be able to provide neuropsychological assessments remotely. Teleneuropsychology can be conducted through various avenues, including telephone, computerized, and televideo modalities. Given neuropsychology's reliance on standardization for proper use of normative data that accompanies individual assessments, the question arises how mode of administration impacts the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of an assessment instrument. The literature review summarizes the research conducted regarding the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of telephone neuropsychological assessments, computerized neuropsychological assessments, and televideo neuropsychological assessments. Additionally, the literature review aims to provide guidelines for best practice for each mode of administration for practicing neuropsychologists. </p>
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Psy.D. Doctor of Clinical Psychology
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Dissertation - Public Access
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Clinical Psychology
- Year dc:date.available
- 2021
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- DeMatteis, Renee
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Elizabeth Lane, Ph.D.
- Christina D. Brown, Psy.D.
Subjects
dc:subject × 7Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/581
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:digitalcommons.nl.edu:diss-1631