{"id":{"repo_id":"national-louis","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.nl.edu:diss-1362"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/national-louis/oai:digitalcommons.nl.edu:diss-1362","repository":{"repo_id":"national-louis","name":"National-Louis University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"23 Illinois Administrative Code 50: Redefining The Formal School Site Observation In Principal Evaluation (A Policy Advocacy Document)","abstract":"<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p> <p>This document explores how the establishment of a Principal Evaluation Steering Committee (PESC) to implement and monitor U.S. District X’s Illinois Principal Evaluation Plan (IPEP) may ensure the effectiveness of its principals as <em>capacity builders </em>who facilitate <em>meaningful</em> and <em>productive systems change</em>. The PESC intervention helps ensure principals and their staff is engaging in purposeful <em>reflective</em> <em>practice</em> and <em>collegial inquiry</em> activities and exercises designed to increase their cognitive, emotional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal capacities (Drago-Severson, Blum-DeStefano, & Asghar, 2013). This document outlines the positive and effective impacts in the contexts of educational, economic, social, political and, moral and ethical disciplinary areas; and advocates that the establishment of a PESC becomes policy in the district. By igniting, through policy, the potential principals can bring to the table individually and collectively through <em>reflective practice</em> and <em>collegial</em> <em>inquiry</em>—rather than using evaluation rating as a means of weeding out ineffective leadership provides a hopeful alternative to a more sanctions-oriented approach to leadership and school improvement (Drago-Severson et al., 2013; Superville, 2015). <strong></strong></p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This document explores how the establishment of a Principal Evaluation Steering Committee (PESC) to implement and monitor U.S. District X’s Illinois Principal Evaluation Plan (IPEP) may ensure the effectiveness of its principals as &lt;em&gt;capacity builders &lt;/em&gt;who facilitate &lt;em&gt;meaningful&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;productive systems change&lt;/em&gt;. The PESC intervention helps ensure principals and their staff is engaging in purposeful &lt;em&gt;reflective&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;practice&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;collegial inquiry&lt;/em&gt; activities and exercises designed to increase their cognitive, emotional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal capacities (Drago-Severson, Blum-DeStefano, &amp; Asghar, 2013). This document outlines the positive and effective impacts in the contexts of educational, economic, social, political and, moral and ethical disciplinary areas; and advocates that the establishment of a PESC becomes policy in the district. By igniting, through policy, the potential principals can bring to the table individually and collectively through &lt;em&gt;reflective practice&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;collegial&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;inquiry&lt;/em&gt;—rather than using evaluation rating as a means of weeding out ineffective leadership provides a hopeful alternative to a more sanctions-oriented approach to leadership and school improvement (Drago-Severson et al., 2013; Superville, 2015). &lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Riley, Noah"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Ed.D. Doctor of Education","degree_level":"Dissertation - Public Access","degree_discipline":"Educational Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Gloria Hall","Dr. Harrington Gibson"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-12-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2018-12-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:20:44Z","subjects":["professional development","leadership","capacity building","school leadership","evaluation","Education"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/342","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Gloria Hall","Dr. Harrington Gibson"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Riley, Noah"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-12-22T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation - Public Access"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D. Doctor of Education"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["professional development","leadership","capacity building","school leadership","evaluation","Education"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/342"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p> <p>This document explores how the establishment of a Principal Evaluation Steering Committee (PESC) to implement and monitor U.S. District X’s Illinois Principal Evaluation Plan (IPEP) may ensure the effectiveness of its principals as <em>capacity builders </em>who facilitate <em>meaningful</em> and <em>productive systems change</em>. The PESC intervention helps ensure principals and their staff is engaging in purposeful <em>reflective</em> <em>practice</em> and <em>collegial inquiry</em> activities and exercises designed to increase their cognitive, emotional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal capacities (Drago-Severson, Blum-DeStefano, & Asghar, 2013). This document outlines the positive and effective impacts in the contexts of educational, economic, social, political and, moral and ethical disciplinary areas; and advocates that the establishment of a PESC becomes policy in the district. By igniting, through policy, the potential principals can bring to the table individually and collectively through <em>reflective practice</em> and <em>collegial</em> <em>inquiry</em>—rather than using evaluation rating as a means of weeding out ineffective leadership provides a hopeful alternative to a more sanctions-oriented approach to leadership and school improvement (Drago-Severson et al., 2013; Superville, 2015). <strong></strong></p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["23 Illinois Administrative Code 50: Redefining The Formal School Site Observation In Principal Evaluation (A Policy Advocacy Document)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Gloria Hall","Dr. Harrington Gibson"],"dc:creator":["Riley, Noah"],"dc:date.available":["2018-12-22T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p> <p>This document explores how the establishment of a Principal Evaluation Steering Committee (PESC) to implement and monitor U.S. District X’s Illinois Principal Evaluation Plan (IPEP) may ensure the effectiveness of its principals as <em>capacity builders </em>who facilitate <em>meaningful</em> and <em>productive systems change</em>. The PESC intervention helps ensure principals and their staff is engaging in purposeful <em>reflective</em> <em>practice</em> and <em>collegial inquiry</em> activities and exercises designed to increase their cognitive, emotional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal capacities (Drago-Severson, Blum-DeStefano, & Asghar, 2013). This document outlines the positive and effective impacts in the contexts of educational, economic, social, political and, moral and ethical disciplinary areas; and advocates that the establishment of a PESC becomes policy in the district. By igniting, through policy, the potential principals can bring to the table individually and collectively through <em>reflective practice</em> and <em>collegial</em> <em>inquiry</em>—rather than using evaluation rating as a means of weeding out ineffective leadership provides a hopeful alternative to a more sanctions-oriented approach to leadership and school improvement (Drago-Severson et al., 2013; Superville, 2015). <strong></strong></p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/342"],"dc:subject":["professional development","leadership","capacity building","school leadership","evaluation","Education"],"dc:title":["23 Illinois Administrative Code 50: Redefining The Formal School Site Observation In Principal Evaluation (A Policy Advocacy Document)"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation - Public Access"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D. Doctor of Education"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:20:44Z"}