Teacher evaluation is a formal construct for improving instruction and student learning. Formal observations are a central component of that process. This change model explores the option of a videotaped observation model as an alternative to the current Illinois state-mandated in-person formal observation to increase teacher ownership, promote reflective practice and improve instructional practices. The evaluation process is a vehicle that promotes collaboration among building leaders and staff. The Illinois shift to a professional practice model provides a construct for a culture and climate that encourages reflection and promotes professional growth (Danielson, 2011; Darling-Hammond, 2013; Jay, 2003; Stuhlman, Hamre, Downer, & Pianta, n.d.). In examining practices related to evaluation and the formal observation, the idea is to build systems empowering teachers and focused on collaboration to promote reflection and professional growth (Myung & Martinez, 2013). The premise of the change model is to realize the context, culture, conditions and competencies that will reflect an effective system with a focus on student learning (Wagner & Kegan, 2006). Qualitative research methods were used to gain a deeper understanding of the teacher and administrator perceived value of the formal observation. Analyzing data from surveys and semi-structured interviews regarding the observation experience, the findings suggest that there is an opportunity to examine alternate structures for the formal observation to increase its value as a tool for professional growth. A further case study of the change model was conducted with three teachers and three administrators. Given responses to the case study coupled with the survey and interview data, I found there is merit to exploring how the videotaped alternative may contribute to an improved teacher evaluation process.
","abstract_html":"<p>Teacher evaluation is a formal construct for improving instruction and student learning. Formal observations are a central component of that process. This change model explores the option of a videotaped observation model as an alternative to the current Illinois state-mandated in-person formal observation to increase teacher ownership, promote reflective practice and improve instructional practices. The evaluation process is a vehicle that promotes collaboration among building leaders and staff. The Illinois shift to a professional practice model provides a construct for a culture and climate that encourages reflection and promotes professional growth (Danielson, 2011; Darling-Hammond, 2013; Jay, 2003; Stuhlman, Hamre, Downer, & Pianta, n.d.). In examining practices related to evaluation and the formal observation, the idea is to build systems empowering teachers and focused on collaboration to promote reflection and professional growth (Myung & Martinez, 2013). The premise of the change model is to realize the context, culture, conditions and competencies that will reflect an effective system with a focus on student learning (Wagner & Kegan, 2006). Qualitative research methods were used to gain a deeper understanding of the teacher and administrator perceived value of the formal observation. Analyzing data from surveys and semi-structured interviews regarding the observation experience, the findings suggest that there is an opportunity to examine alternate structures for the formal observation to increase its value as a tool for professional growth. A further case study of the change model was conducted with three teachers and three administrators. Given responses to the case study coupled with the survey and interview data, I found there is merit to exploring how the videotaped alternative may contribute to an improved teacher evaluation process.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Brownlow, Merryl B"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Ed.D. Doctor of Education","degree_level":"Dissertation - Public Access","degree_discipline":"Educational Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Elizabeth Minor","Dr. Gloria McDaniel","Dr. Harrington Gibson"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-04-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2018-04-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:20:44Z","subjects":["Formal Observation","Teacher Evaluation","Videotaped Observations","Reflective Practice","Educational Administration and Supervision","Educational Leadership","Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration","Teacher Education and Professional Development"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/304","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Elizabeth Minor","Dr. Gloria McDaniel","Dr. Harrington Gibson"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Brownlow, Merryl B"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-04-24T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation - Public Access"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D. Doctor of Education"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Formal Observation","Teacher Evaluation","Videotaped Observations","Reflective Practice","Educational Administration and Supervision","Educational Leadership","Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration","Teacher Education and Professional Development"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/304"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Teacher evaluation is a formal construct for improving instruction and student learning. Formal observations are a central component of that process. This change model explores the option of a videotaped observation model as an alternative to the current Illinois state-mandated in-person formal observation to increase teacher ownership, promote reflective practice and improve instructional practices. The evaluation process is a vehicle that promotes collaboration among building leaders and staff. The Illinois shift to a professional practice model provides a construct for a culture and climate that encourages reflection and promotes professional growth (Danielson, 2011; Darling-Hammond, 2013; Jay, 2003; Stuhlman, Hamre, Downer, & Pianta, n.d.). In examining practices related to evaluation and the formal observation, the idea is to build systems empowering teachers and focused on collaboration to promote reflection and professional growth (Myung & Martinez, 2013). The premise of the change model is to realize the context, culture, conditions and competencies that will reflect an effective system with a focus on student learning (Wagner & Kegan, 2006). Qualitative research methods were used to gain a deeper understanding of the teacher and administrator perceived value of the formal observation. Analyzing data from surveys and semi-structured interviews regarding the observation experience, the findings suggest that there is an opportunity to examine alternate structures for the formal observation to increase its value as a tool for professional growth. A further case study of the change model was conducted with three teachers and three administrators. Given responses to the case study coupled with the survey and interview data, I found there is merit to exploring how the videotaped alternative may contribute to an improved teacher evaluation process.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Teacher Evaluation: The Change We Wish to See; Improving the Formal Observation Process to Improve Student Learning"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Elizabeth Minor","Dr. Gloria McDaniel","Dr. Harrington Gibson"],"dc:creator":["Brownlow, Merryl B"],"dc:date.available":["2018-04-24T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Teacher evaluation is a formal construct for improving instruction and student learning. Formal observations are a central component of that process. This change model explores the option of a videotaped observation model as an alternative to the current Illinois state-mandated in-person formal observation to increase teacher ownership, promote reflective practice and improve instructional practices. The evaluation process is a vehicle that promotes collaboration among building leaders and staff. The Illinois shift to a professional practice model provides a construct for a culture and climate that encourages reflection and promotes professional growth (Danielson, 2011; Darling-Hammond, 2013; Jay, 2003; Stuhlman, Hamre, Downer, & Pianta, n.d.). In examining practices related to evaluation and the formal observation, the idea is to build systems empowering teachers and focused on collaboration to promote reflection and professional growth (Myung & Martinez, 2013). The premise of the change model is to realize the context, culture, conditions and competencies that will reflect an effective system with a focus on student learning (Wagner & Kegan, 2006). Qualitative research methods were used to gain a deeper understanding of the teacher and administrator perceived value of the formal observation. Analyzing data from surveys and semi-structured interviews regarding the observation experience, the findings suggest that there is an opportunity to examine alternate structures for the formal observation to increase its value as a tool for professional growth. A further case study of the change model was conducted with three teachers and three administrators. Given responses to the case study coupled with the survey and interview data, I found there is merit to exploring how the videotaped alternative may contribute to an improved teacher evaluation process.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/304"],"dc:subject":["Formal Observation","Teacher Evaluation","Videotaped Observations","Reflective Practice","Educational Administration and Supervision","Educational Leadership","Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration","Teacher Education and Professional Development"],"dc:title":["Teacher Evaluation: The Change We Wish to See; Improving the Formal Observation Process to Improve Student Learning"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation - Public Access"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D. Doctor of Education"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:20:44Z"}