{"id":{"repo_id":"montana","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarworks.umt.edu:etd-1362"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/montana/oai:scholarworks.umt.edu:etd-1362","repository":{"repo_id":"montana","name":"University of Montana","base_url":"https://scholarworks.umt.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"DYSPHAGIA TREATMENT PLANNING: ASSESSING CLINICIANS’ TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDY REPORTS","abstract":"The Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) study is a commonly used radiographic procedure for diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders. Despite attempts by dysphagia specialists to standardize the MBS, most settings have not adopted such standardized procedures. High variability of assessment patterns arguably contribute to variability of treatment recommendations made from diagnostic information derived from the MBS. An online survey was distributed to SLPs participating in American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) listservs. Sixty-three SLPs currently treating swallowing disorders participated. Outcome measures included 1) descriptive measures of participant demographics and 2) inter-rater agreement for treatment target and strategy recommendations made following review of MBS reports in low and high pathophysiology conditions, 3) chi-square analyses comparing target and strategy recommendations according to report stimulus, and 4) descriptive measures of clinicians’ ratings of four MBS reports, including the information they reported as most useful for making treatment recommendations. Results indicated wide variability among clinicians for recommended treatment targets and techniques. Chi-square analyses revealed associations between target selection and appropriate treatment recommendations except when comparing compensatory and restorative recommendations in the low pathology condition. Results indicated a difference in the distributions (p<0.05) of these variables in the low and high pathophysiology experimental conditions. Clinicians selected more treatment targets and provided more appropriate compensatory and restorative recommendations when provided with higher degrees of pathophysiological explanations of dysphagia impairment. Clinical implications of the results are discussed in terms of the study limitations.","abstract_html":"The Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) study is a commonly used radiographic procedure for diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders. Despite attempts by dysphagia specialists to standardize the MBS, most settings have not adopted such standardized procedures. High variability of assessment patterns arguably contribute to variability of treatment recommendations made from diagnostic information derived from the MBS. An online survey was distributed to SLPs participating in American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) listservs. Sixty-three SLPs currently treating swallowing disorders participated. Outcome measures included 1) descriptive measures of participant demographics and 2) inter-rater agreement for treatment target and strategy recommendations made following review of MBS reports in low and high pathophysiology conditions, 3) chi-square analyses comparing target and strategy recommendations according to report stimulus, and 4) descriptive measures of clinicians’ ratings of four MBS reports, including the information they reported as most useful for making treatment recommendations. Results indicated wide variability among clinicians for recommended treatment targets and techniques. Chi-square analyses revealed associations between target selection and appropriate treatment recommendations except when comparing compensatory and restorative recommendations in the low pathology condition. Results indicated a difference in the distributions (p&lt;0.05) of these variables in the low and high pathophysiology experimental conditions. Clinicians selected more treatment targets and provided more appropriate compensatory and restorative recommendations when provided with higher degrees of pathophysiological explanations of dysphagia impairment. Clinical implications of the results are discussed in terms of the study limitations.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Danielson, Jennifer Dawn"],"institution":"University of Montana","degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2012-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:10:43Z","subjects":["dysphagia","interrater agreement","Modified Barium Swallow","treatment recommendations"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/343","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Danielson, Jennifer Dawn"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Montana"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis - Campus Access Only"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["dysphagia","interrater agreement","Modified Barium Swallow","treatment recommendations"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/343"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) study is a commonly used radiographic procedure for diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders. Despite attempts by dysphagia specialists to standardize the MBS, most settings have not adopted such standardized procedures. High variability of assessment patterns arguably contribute to variability of treatment recommendations made from diagnostic information derived from the MBS. An online survey was distributed to SLPs participating in American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) listservs. Sixty-three SLPs currently treating swallowing disorders participated. Outcome measures included 1) descriptive measures of participant demographics and 2) inter-rater agreement for treatment target and strategy recommendations made following review of MBS reports in low and high pathophysiology conditions, 3) chi-square analyses comparing target and strategy recommendations according to report stimulus, and 4) descriptive measures of clinicians’ ratings of four MBS reports, including the information they reported as most useful for making treatment recommendations. Results indicated wide variability among clinicians for recommended treatment targets and techniques. Chi-square analyses revealed associations between target selection and appropriate treatment recommendations except when comparing compensatory and restorative recommendations in the low pathology condition. Results indicated a difference in the distributions (p<0.05) of these variables in the low and high pathophysiology experimental conditions. Clinicians selected more treatment targets and provided more appropriate compensatory and restorative recommendations when provided with higher degrees of pathophysiological explanations of dysphagia impairment. Clinical implications of the results are discussed in terms of the study limitations."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["DYSPHAGIA TREATMENT PLANNING: ASSESSING CLINICIANS’ TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDY REPORTS"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Danielson, Jennifer Dawn"],"dc:description.abstract":["The Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) study is a commonly used radiographic procedure for diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders. Despite attempts by dysphagia specialists to standardize the MBS, most settings have not adopted such standardized procedures. High variability of assessment patterns arguably contribute to variability of treatment recommendations made from diagnostic information derived from the MBS. An online survey was distributed to SLPs participating in American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) listservs. Sixty-three SLPs currently treating swallowing disorders participated. Outcome measures included 1) descriptive measures of participant demographics and 2) inter-rater agreement for treatment target and strategy recommendations made following review of MBS reports in low and high pathophysiology conditions, 3) chi-square analyses comparing target and strategy recommendations according to report stimulus, and 4) descriptive measures of clinicians’ ratings of four MBS reports, including the information they reported as most useful for making treatment recommendations. Results indicated wide variability among clinicians for recommended treatment targets and techniques. Chi-square analyses revealed associations between target selection and appropriate treatment recommendations except when comparing compensatory and restorative recommendations in the low pathology condition. Results indicated a difference in the distributions (p<0.05) of these variables in the low and high pathophysiology experimental conditions. Clinicians selected more treatment targets and provided more appropriate compensatory and restorative recommendations when provided with higher degrees of pathophysiological explanations of dysphagia impairment. Clinical implications of the results are discussed in terms of the study limitations."],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/343"],"dc:publisher":["University of Montana"],"dc:subject":["dysphagia","interrater agreement","Modified Barium Swallow","treatment recommendations"],"dc:title":["DYSPHAGIA TREATMENT PLANNING: ASSESSING CLINICIANS’ TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDY REPORTS"],"dc:type":["Thesis - Campus Access Only"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:10:43Z"}