Citizen Participation in a Montana Land Use Debate: A Case Study of the Proposed Bitterroot Resort

To increase citizen participation in land use decisions, local governments often use collaborative processes as a means to engage citizens in land use plans. However, in rural areas without plans, there lacks a formal means for citizens to participate in land use decisions. Citizens are left to grassroots approaches for involvement in land use debates. To better understand citizen engagement in rural land use debates, this study explores barriers and motivations for participation as well as the effectiveness of one particular grassroots organization, the Community Benefits Coalition. To explore barriers and motivations for participation and the perceived effectiveness of the coalition 12 in-depth interviews were conducted. This study reflects commonly noted barriers and motivations for participation such as time and efficacy and also brings to light more unique motivations such as sense of place, ideas about land use, and personal relationships. This study also suggests, that according to the perceptions of coalition members, the coalition provided an avenue for participation, but there were also limitations associated with its efficacy.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Arts (MA)

Grantor dc:publisher

University of Montana

Year

2011

Author dc:creator

• Matthews, Diane Lisa

• Community Benefits Agreement
• Land Use
• Participation

Repository record dc:identifier

https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/198

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:scholarworks.umt.edu:etd-1217