VIOLENCE AND RHETORIC: NARRATIVE PRODUCTION IN THE WAKE OF HARPER’S FERRY

On the evening of October 18th, 1859, it had become clear that John Brown’s raid on the federal arsenal at Harper’s Ferry, Virginia had not only fallen short of expectations—the beginning of a slave insurrection eventually leading to collapse of the institution entirely—but had dismally failed. The raid had cost seventeen lives, among them two of Brown’s sons. Not a single slave had been freed. The raid, however, had touched off something else. It had shaken, in important ways for both North and South, the ideological foundations of the slave system and, consequently, the political and economic systems of the nation that sanctioned it. Utilizing the ideas of Hayden White regarding the moralizing nature of narrative historiography, this project analyzes newspaper articles and literature published soon after the raid as they attempt to re-incorporate the events in question into a larger historical narrative. They do so via various ideological social codes, referred to in the project as metanarratives. My reading focuses on what is implied, assumed, and omitted. It is therefore semiological in nature, and utilizes a methodology of narrative analysis that borrows heavily from French theorist Roland Barthes. The project is an examination of the role or roles particular types of rhetoric can play in the production of historical and popular narrative.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Arts (MA)

Grantor dc:publisher

University of Montana

Year

2011

Author dc:creator

• Myers, Nicholas

• antebellum
• ethics
• metanarrative
• rhetoric
• semiology
• violence
• harper's ferry
• john brown

Repository record dc:identifier

https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1170

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:scholarworks.umt.edu:etd-2189