{"id":{"repo_id":"montana-tech","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarworks.umt.edu:etd-1878"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/montana-tech/oai:scholarworks.umt.edu:etd-1878","repository":{"repo_id":"montana-tech","name":"Montana Technology","base_url":"https://scholarworks.umt.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Salud, Dignidad, Justicia: Articulating \"Choice\" and \"Reproductive Justice\" for Latinas in the United States","abstract":"This investigation explores the rhetorical evolution of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. The author argues that the rhetors of the reviewed texts reveal the organization’s dual goals of both altering and resonating with the values and attitudes of Latinas regarding their <reproductive rights> concerns, as well as the necessity of combating systemic barriers and oppressive dominant ideology hindering Latinas’ ability to exercise a full range of choices. Although this two-fold purpose is persistent throughout the artifacts, as the Latina Institute embraces the language of reproductive justice, the agency gradually shifts its rhetorical efforts from addressing internal issues directed toward its constituency to outward concerns seeking to alter the dominant societal structure. This study also uncovers that reproductive justice must be a precondition for real choices to exist. As such, choice emerges as a secondary language term that functions as an outcome of reproductive freedom. Furthermore, the Latina Institute’s rhetoric suggests that abortion rights, choice, reproductive freedom, and reproductive justice can and must expand to encapsulate a comprehensive agenda capable of capturing the diverse needs of Latinas and immigrant Latinas living in the United States. Although these language terms possess sufficient mutability to encompass a wide-reaching agenda, it is imperative that they be employed strategically, as rhetors consider audience and associated ideologies. Finally, this inquiry argues that while a comprehensive approach to movement-building is often essential for meeting the intersectional needs of marginalized women, at times it may be necessary to center efforts on a particular issue in response to key exigencies necessitating change.","abstract_html":"This investigation explores the rhetorical evolution of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. The author argues that the rhetors of the reviewed texts reveal the organization’s dual goals of both altering and resonating with the values and attitudes of Latinas regarding their &lt;reproductive rights&gt; concerns, as well as the necessity of combating systemic barriers and oppressive dominant ideology hindering Latinas’ ability to exercise a full range of choices. Although this two-fold purpose is persistent throughout the artifacts, as the Latina Institute embraces the language of reproductive justice, the agency gradually shifts its rhetorical efforts from addressing internal issues directed toward its constituency to outward concerns seeking to alter the dominant societal structure. This study also uncovers that reproductive justice must be a precondition for real choices to exist. As such, choice emerges as a secondary language term that functions as an outcome of reproductive freedom. Furthermore, the Latina Institute’s rhetoric suggests that abortion rights, choice, reproductive freedom, and reproductive justice can and must expand to encapsulate a comprehensive agenda capable of capturing the diverse needs of Latinas and immigrant Latinas living in the United States. Although these language terms possess sufficient mutability to encompass a wide-reaching agenda, it is imperative that they be employed strategically, as rhetors consider audience and associated ideologies. Finally, this inquiry argues that while a comprehensive approach to movement-building is often essential for meeting the intersectional needs of marginalized women, at times it may be necessary to center efforts on a particular issue in response to key exigencies necessitating change.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["de Onis, Kathleen Maire"],"institution":"University of Montana","degree_name":"Master of Arts (MA)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2011-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:13:58Z","subjects":["ideograph","ideology","immigrants","Latinas","reproductive justice","choice","social movements"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/859","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["de Onis, Kathleen Maire"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Montana"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (MA)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["ideograph","ideology","immigrants","Latinas","reproductive justice","choice","social movements"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/859"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This investigation explores the rhetorical evolution of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. The author argues that the rhetors of the reviewed texts reveal the organization’s dual goals of both altering and resonating with the values and attitudes of Latinas regarding their <reproductive rights> concerns, as well as the necessity of combating systemic barriers and oppressive dominant ideology hindering Latinas’ ability to exercise a full range of choices. Although this two-fold purpose is persistent throughout the artifacts, as the Latina Institute embraces the language of reproductive justice, the agency gradually shifts its rhetorical efforts from addressing internal issues directed toward its constituency to outward concerns seeking to alter the dominant societal structure. This study also uncovers that reproductive justice must be a precondition for real choices to exist. As such, choice emerges as a secondary language term that functions as an outcome of reproductive freedom. Furthermore, the Latina Institute’s rhetoric suggests that abortion rights, choice, reproductive freedom, and reproductive justice can and must expand to encapsulate a comprehensive agenda capable of capturing the diverse needs of Latinas and immigrant Latinas living in the United States. Although these language terms possess sufficient mutability to encompass a wide-reaching agenda, it is imperative that they be employed strategically, as rhetors consider audience and associated ideologies. Finally, this inquiry argues that while a comprehensive approach to movement-building is often essential for meeting the intersectional needs of marginalized women, at times it may be necessary to center efforts on a particular issue in response to key exigencies necessitating change."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Salud, Dignidad, Justicia: Articulating \"Choice\" and \"Reproductive Justice\" for Latinas in the United States"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["de Onis, Kathleen Maire"],"dc:description.abstract":["This investigation explores the rhetorical evolution of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. The author argues that the rhetors of the reviewed texts reveal the organization’s dual goals of both altering and resonating with the values and attitudes of Latinas regarding their <reproductive rights> concerns, as well as the necessity of combating systemic barriers and oppressive dominant ideology hindering Latinas’ ability to exercise a full range of choices. Although this two-fold purpose is persistent throughout the artifacts, as the Latina Institute embraces the language of reproductive justice, the agency gradually shifts its rhetorical efforts from addressing internal issues directed toward its constituency to outward concerns seeking to alter the dominant societal structure. This study also uncovers that reproductive justice must be a precondition for real choices to exist. As such, choice emerges as a secondary language term that functions as an outcome of reproductive freedom. Furthermore, the Latina Institute’s rhetoric suggests that abortion rights, choice, reproductive freedom, and reproductive justice can and must expand to encapsulate a comprehensive agenda capable of capturing the diverse needs of Latinas and immigrant Latinas living in the United States. Although these language terms possess sufficient mutability to encompass a wide-reaching agenda, it is imperative that they be employed strategically, as rhetors consider audience and associated ideologies. Finally, this inquiry argues that while a comprehensive approach to movement-building is often essential for meeting the intersectional needs of marginalized women, at times it may be necessary to center efforts on a particular issue in response to key exigencies necessitating change."],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/859"],"dc:publisher":["University of Montana"],"dc:subject":["ideograph","ideology","immigrants","Latinas","reproductive justice","choice","social movements"],"dc:title":["Salud, Dignidad, Justicia: Articulating \"Choice\" and \"Reproductive Justice\" for Latinas in the United States"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (MA)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:13:58Z"}