Rhetoric and the Restoration Landscape: Forest Restoration in Environmental Debate

Vranizan, Gregory M. M.S. Autumn 2006 Environmental Studies RHETORIC AND THE RESTORATION LANDSCAPE: FOREST RESTORATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DEBATE Committee Chairperson: Phil Condon Forest restoration on federal land has become the focus of an ongoing public debate in the West. Interest groups on various sides have engaged in a rhetorical contest to define restoration in ways that accord with their own ideas about the use and management of the nation’s public lands. This study examines the positions taken by different groups and considers the rhetorical claims they make. Disputes over meanings and practices have thus far limited the chances for a meaningful restoration program. Science, industry, and the environmental community have all argued that their respective agendas and values should determine a public policy for restoration. Collectively, their arguments map out a middle ground in the “restoration landscape” where the various interest groups must eventually come to agreement. Although intransigent eco-politics have slowed progress toward a goal of restoring forest ecosystems, the continuing rhetorical exchange shows these competing interests moving toward inevitable compromise. The policy outcomes for restoration can include radical reform within the existing management structure: ecological restoration officially declared a federal priority in an equitable and realistic program prescribed under law. Thus the restoration debate gives us reason to hope that ecological health, sustainable use, and social accord may all be restored to western forests.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Science (MS)

Grantor dc:publisher

University of Montana

Year

2006

Author dc:creator

• Vranizan, Gregory M.

• eco-politics
• forest ecology
• public-land management
• restoration

Repository record dc:identifier

https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/839

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:scholarworks.umt.edu:etd-1858