{"id":{"repo_id":"mo-state","oai_identifier":"oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-2451"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mo-state/oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-2451","repository":{"repo_id":"mo-state","name":"Missouri State University","base_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Ballistic Missile Defense: A History and Reevaluation of Missile Defense in the United States","abstract":"Attempts by the United States to develop and deploy ballistic missile defense are nothing new. Under the context of Mutually Assured Destruction and the Cold War, a \"limited” missile defense was proposed. Given technological and political shortfalls, the deployment of a \"limited” missile defense was delayed until President Bush withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002. This action set the stage for the deployment of a national missile shield. Current developments however are putting this shield to the test. President Obama has outlined a new proposal for missile defense to respond to new and changing threats, but political and technological problems remain. While President Obama's plan is ambitious, many of his objectives are seemingly political, and the failure of an Obama system could be used as cover for a scaling back of ballistic missile defense. What is needed is a new plan, that will make Europe take a larger role, offer better protection of the United States mainland, and accomplish these goals with a reasonable cost.","abstract_html":"Attempts by the United States to develop and deploy ballistic missile defense are nothing new. Under the context of Mutually Assured Destruction and the Cold War, a "limited” missile defense was proposed. Given technological and political shortfalls, the deployment of a "limited” missile defense was delayed until President Bush withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002. This action set the stage for the deployment of a national missile shield. Current developments however are putting this shield to the test. President Obama has outlined a new proposal for missile defense to respond to new and changing threats, but political and technological problems remain. While President Obama's plan is ambitious, many of his objectives are seemingly political, and the failure of an Obama system could be used as cover for a scaling back of ballistic missile defense. What is needed is a new plan, that will make Europe take a larger role, offer better protection of the United States mainland, and accomplish these goals with a reasonable cost.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Flanagan, Robert"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Defense and Strategic Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Ilan Berman"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-12-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2009-12-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:16:23Z","subjects":["missile","ballistic","defense","SDI","midcourse","terminal","boost","Defense and Security Studies"],"languages":[],"rights":["© Robert Flanagan"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1450","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Ilan Berman"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Flanagan, Robert"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Defense and Strategic Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["missile","ballistic","defense","SDI","midcourse","terminal","boost","Defense and Security Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© Robert Flanagan"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1450"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Attempts by the United States to develop and deploy ballistic missile defense are nothing new. Under the context of Mutually Assured Destruction and the Cold War, a \"limited” missile defense was proposed. Given technological and political shortfalls, the deployment of a \"limited” missile defense was delayed until President Bush withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002. This action set the stage for the deployment of a national missile shield. Current developments however are putting this shield to the test. President Obama has outlined a new proposal for missile defense to respond to new and changing threats, but political and technological problems remain. While President Obama's plan is ambitious, many of his objectives are seemingly political, and the failure of an Obama system could be used as cover for a scaling back of ballistic missile defense. What is needed is a new plan, that will make Europe take a larger role, offer better protection of the United States mainland, and accomplish these goals with a reasonable cost."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Ballistic Missile Defense: A History and Reevaluation of Missile Defense in the United States"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Ilan Berman"],"dc:creator":["Flanagan, Robert"],"dc:description.abstract":["Attempts by the United States to develop and deploy ballistic missile defense are nothing new. Under the context of Mutually Assured Destruction and the Cold War, a \"limited” missile defense was proposed. Given technological and political shortfalls, the deployment of a \"limited” missile defense was delayed until President Bush withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002. This action set the stage for the deployment of a national missile shield. Current developments however are putting this shield to the test. President Obama has outlined a new proposal for missile defense to respond to new and changing threats, but political and technological problems remain. While President Obama's plan is ambitious, many of his objectives are seemingly political, and the failure of an Obama system could be used as cover for a scaling back of ballistic missile defense. What is needed is a new plan, that will make Europe take a larger role, offer better protection of the United States mainland, and accomplish these goals with a reasonable cost."],"dc:identifier":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1450"],"dc:rights":["© Robert Flanagan"],"dc:subject":["missile","ballistic","defense","SDI","midcourse","terminal","boost","Defense and Security Studies"],"dc:title":["Ballistic Missile Defense: A History and Reevaluation of Missile Defense in the United States"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Defense and Strategic Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:16:23Z"}