This thesis examines the usefulness of the Mazmanian-Sabatier implementation framework in analyzing the implementation of the EPA’s Phase II Storm Water regulations at the local level, specifically in the city of Lake Saint Louis, Missouri, with three major questions in mind. First, are statutory variables more important than local variables in the implementation process? Second, is attainment of statutory objectives the best way to measure the implementation process? Third, is implementation best examined from the top of the implementation hierarchy, down? Answering these questions could improve the quality of this framework, thus subsequent implementation research based on the framework. Data for the case study were gathered from national, state, and local documents, as well as personal interviews of key local implementers from the municipal government of Lake Saint Louis. Results from the study indicate that in this case, local, non-political variables seemed to play a role at least equal to that of statutory variables in influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be applicable to a wide variety of policy types and studies, the measuring of implementation success by attainment of formal statutory objectives seems best. Finally, a top-down view of implementation does not provide a complete picture of policy implementation as it can hinder discovery of crucial data, informal influences, and causal linkages. The results indicate that while the Mazmanian-Sabatier framework retains value as an implementation framework, it does contain some assumptions that should be corrected.
","abstract_html":"<p>This thesis examines the usefulness of the Mazmanian-Sabatier implementation framework in analyzing the implementation of the EPA’s Phase II Storm Water regulations at the local level, specifically in the city of Lake Saint Louis, Missouri, with three major questions in mind. First, are statutory variables more important than local variables in the implementation process? Second, is attainment of statutory objectives the best way to measure the implementation process? Third, is implementation best examined from the top of the implementation hierarchy, down? Answering these questions could improve the quality of this framework, thus subsequent implementation research based on the framework. Data for the case study were gathered from national, state, and local documents, as well as personal interviews of key local implementers from the municipal government of Lake Saint Louis. Results from the study indicate that in this case, local, non-political variables seemed to play a role at least equal to that of statutory variables in influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be applicable to a wide variety of policy types and studies, the measuring of implementation success by attainment of formal statutory objectives seems best. Finally, a top-down view of implementation does not provide a complete picture of policy implementation as it can hinder discovery of crucial data, informal influences, and causal linkages. The results indicate that while the Mazmanian-Sabatier framework retains value as an implementation framework, it does contain some assumptions that should be corrected.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hatlelid, Marie Elizabeth Beckmann"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Public Administration","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Brian Ellison"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2005-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:16:11Z","subjects":["policy","implementation","environment","regulation","government","Public Administration"],"languages":[],"rights":["© Marie E. Beckmann"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1176","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Brian Ellison"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hatlelid, Marie Elizabeth Beckmann"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Public Administration"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["policy","implementation","environment","regulation","government","Public Administration"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© Marie E. Beckmann"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1176"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis examines the usefulness of the Mazmanian-Sabatier implementation framework in analyzing the implementation of the EPA’s Phase II Storm Water regulations at the local level, specifically in the city of Lake Saint Louis, Missouri, with three major questions in mind. First, are statutory variables more important than local variables in the implementation process? Second, is attainment of statutory objectives the best way to measure the implementation process? Third, is implementation best examined from the top of the implementation hierarchy, down? Answering these questions could improve the quality of this framework, thus subsequent implementation research based on the framework. Data for the case study were gathered from national, state, and local documents, as well as personal interviews of key local implementers from the municipal government of Lake Saint Louis. Results from the study indicate that in this case, local, non-political variables seemed to play a role at least equal to that of statutory variables in influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be applicable to a wide variety of policy types and studies, the measuring of implementation success by attainment of formal statutory objectives seems best. Finally, a top-down view of implementation does not provide a complete picture of policy implementation as it can hinder discovery of crucial data, informal influences, and causal linkages. The results indicate that while the Mazmanian-Sabatier framework retains value as an implementation framework, it does contain some assumptions that should be corrected.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Mazmanian-Sabatier Implementation Framework Examined: an Application to Storm Water Policy"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Brian Ellison"],"dc:creator":["Hatlelid, Marie Elizabeth Beckmann"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis examines the usefulness of the Mazmanian-Sabatier implementation framework in analyzing the implementation of the EPA’s Phase II Storm Water regulations at the local level, specifically in the city of Lake Saint Louis, Missouri, with three major questions in mind. First, are statutory variables more important than local variables in the implementation process? Second, is attainment of statutory objectives the best way to measure the implementation process? Third, is implementation best examined from the top of the implementation hierarchy, down? Answering these questions could improve the quality of this framework, thus subsequent implementation research based on the framework. Data for the case study were gathered from national, state, and local documents, as well as personal interviews of key local implementers from the municipal government of Lake Saint Louis. Results from the study indicate that in this case, local, non-political variables seemed to play a role at least equal to that of statutory variables in influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be influencing implementation success. When attempting to create a framework that must be applicable to a wide variety of policy types and studies, the measuring of implementation success by attainment of formal statutory objectives seems best. Finally, a top-down view of implementation does not provide a complete picture of policy implementation as it can hinder discovery of crucial data, informal influences, and causal linkages. The results indicate that while the Mazmanian-Sabatier framework retains value as an implementation framework, it does contain some assumptions that should be corrected.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/1176"],"dc:rights":["© Marie E. Beckmann"],"dc:subject":["policy","implementation","environment","regulation","government","Public Administration"],"dc:title":["The Mazmanian-Sabatier Implementation Framework Examined: an Application to Storm Water Policy"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Public Administration"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:16:11Z"}