{"id":{"repo_id":"mo-state","oai_identifier":"oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1826"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mo-state/oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1826","repository":{"repo_id":"mo-state","name":"Missouri State University","base_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Close Range: a Study of Battlefield Ranges At Shiloh and Antietam","abstract":"A study of the range of fire at the battles of Shiloh and Antietam is based on an analysis of data found in the after-action reports printed in The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. The data collected was any linear measurement, such as rods, feet, yards, or paces. The results of this study show that the range of fire at these two battles was less than 100 yards, rather than the 300 yards presumed in other studies. The data therefore supports a revisionist interpretation that the introduction of the rifled musket did not revolutionize battlefield tactics as most historians claim.","abstract_html":"A study of the range of fire at the battles of Shiloh and Antietam is based on an analysis of data found in the after-action reports printed in The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. The data collected was any linear measurement, such as rods, feet, yards, or paces. The results of this study show that the range of fire at these two battles was less than 100 yards, rather than the 300 yards presumed in other studies. The data therefore supports a revisionist interpretation that the introduction of the rifled musket did not revolutionize battlefield tactics as most historians claim.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Newton, Michael Paul"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts in History","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["William Piston"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1991,"date_issued":"1991-12-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1991-12-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:15:54Z","subjects":["History"],"languages":[],"rights":["© Michael Paul Newton"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/825","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["William Piston"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Newton, Michael Paul"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts in History"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["History"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© Michael Paul Newton"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/825"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["A study of the range of fire at the battles of Shiloh and Antietam is based on an analysis of data found in the after-action reports printed in The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. The data collected was any linear measurement, such as rods, feet, yards, or paces. The results of this study show that the range of fire at these two battles was less than 100 yards, rather than the 300 yards presumed in other studies. The data therefore supports a revisionist interpretation that the introduction of the rifled musket did not revolutionize battlefield tactics as most historians claim."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Close Range: a Study of Battlefield Ranges At Shiloh and Antietam"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["William Piston"],"dc:creator":["Newton, Michael Paul"],"dc:description.abstract":["A study of the range of fire at the battles of Shiloh and Antietam is based on an analysis of data found in the after-action reports printed in The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. The data collected was any linear measurement, such as rods, feet, yards, or paces. The results of this study show that the range of fire at these two battles was less than 100 yards, rather than the 300 yards presumed in other studies. The data therefore supports a revisionist interpretation that the introduction of the rifled musket did not revolutionize battlefield tactics as most historians claim."],"dc:identifier":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/825"],"dc:rights":["© Michael Paul Newton"],"dc:subject":["History"],"dc:title":["Close Range: a Study of Battlefield Ranges At Shiloh and Antietam"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts in History"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:15:54Z"}