Abstract
dc:description.abstractAssertive disarmament is the use of military force to delay or terminate the progress of nascent or ongoing nuclear, biological, and chemical weapon programs along with, perhaps, their associated ballistic missile programs. Such capabilities in the hands of hostile powers increasingly threaten the population and assets of the United States. Moreover, the foreign policy and military strategy of the United States depend upon a forward global presence, and nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and ballistic missiles available to adversaries of the United States complicate U.S. military strategy and decision making. As a U.S. policy option to augment current Department of Defense counterproliferation strategies, assertive disarmament could prove useful in cases where the proliferation threat is especially urgent. Assertive disarmament has also been used successfully in the past. It is an option not without risk, however, and U.S. decision-makers should consider the political implications and military requirements of assertive disarmament attack carefully. Assertive disarmament also requires selectivity, and only those nations that are particularly threatening should be considered as potential candidates. This thesis examines the political and military advisability and utility of assertive disarmament.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Masters
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Defense and Strategic Studies
- Year
- 2001
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Kaylor, Rodney
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- William Van Cleave
Subjects
dc:subject × 1Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- © Rodney Kaylor
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/703
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1704