Back to results

Missouri State University

Comparison of Speech Audiometry Stimulus Lists on Hearing Impaired and Normal Hearing Subjects

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The appropriateness and differences of different speech recognition and speech intelligibility word lists were investigated. It has been reported that the use of two-syllable spondee words that are comprised of high frequency sounds may more accurately represent the true speech recognition abilities of those individuals with a high frequency sesorinueral hearing loss. There is also some question whether the use of 40 dB SL (re: SRT) for speech intelligibility testing may well undershoot the PB-Max of an individual with a high frequency sloping sensorinueral hearing loss (Martin and Jansen, 1985). Fifteen individuals with a pre-determined high frequency, sloping sensoriunueral hearing loss and ten with normal hearing were adminstered speech recognition threshold tests using the C.I.D. W-1 and the Martin-Jansen High Frequency word lists. These subjects were administered the C.I.D. W-22, NU-6, and an open set presentation of the California Consonant Test at 20, 30, 40, and 50 dB SL (re:SRT of W-1 and Martin-Jansen High Frequency word lists). Results indicated that there is a significant difference between the SRT of the C.I.D. W-1 and the Martin-Jansen High Frequency Word List for the hearing impaired group, but not for the normal hearing group. Results indicated that the use of 40 dB SL (re: SRT) does indeed undershoot an individuals maximum speech intelligibility ability for the hearing impaired group. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference between lists at 20, 30, and 40 dB SL, and 50 dB SL for the hearing impaired group.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science in Communication Sciences and Disorders
Level thesis:degree_level
Masters
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Communication Sciences and Disorders
Year
2000

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Hogan, Richard M.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Thomas Franklin

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • © Richard M Hogan

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/686
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1687

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Missouri State University
Base URL
bearworks.missouristate.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Hogan, Richard M.. Comparison of Speech Audiometry Stimulus Lists on Hearing Impaired and Normal Hearing Subjects. Masters thesis, 2000. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/686