{"id":{"repo_id":"mo-state","oai_identifier":"oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1535"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mo-state/oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1535","repository":{"repo_id":"mo-state","name":"Missouri State University","base_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A Survey of Strategic Arms Control","abstract":"This analysis will detail the American experience in strategic arms control as it has been conducted in the post-World War II strategic environment. No single political enterprise has so involved the large powers or lent itself to the degree of public debate that has been generated by arms control. It has often, perhaps too often, been the case that the measure of the bilateral great power relationship has been taken on the basis of strategic arms control. Due to its portents for the world order, any process so dominating this political relationship warrants special consideration. Broken into four historical periods: the \"disarmament era,\" the \"modern era,\", the \"SALT era,\" and the \"Raegan/Bush era,\" strategic arms control will here be discussed and analyzed based on several criteria. Its history and evolution, the impact it has had on U.S. forces and force planning, its impact on strategic stability and the relative balance of power, and whether or not the various forays into arms control meet the requirements, singly or in toto, of \"good\" arms control will all be discussed here.","abstract_html":"This analysis will detail the American experience in strategic arms control as it has been conducted in the post-World War II strategic environment. No single political enterprise has so involved the large powers or lent itself to the degree of public debate that has been generated by arms control. It has often, perhaps too often, been the case that the measure of the bilateral great power relationship has been taken on the basis of strategic arms control. Due to its portents for the world order, any process so dominating this political relationship warrants special consideration. Broken into four historical periods: the "disarmament era," the "modern era,", the "SALT era," and the "Raegan/Bush era," strategic arms control will here be discussed and analyzed based on several criteria. Its history and evolution, the impact it has had on U.S. forces and force planning, its impact on strategic stability and the relative balance of power, and whether or not the various forays into arms control meet the requirements, singly or in toto, of "good" arms control will all be discussed here.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Carey, Donald L"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Defense and Strategic Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["William Van Cleave"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1990,"date_issued":"1990-07-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"1990-07-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:15:35Z","subjects":["Defense and Security Studies"],"languages":[],"rights":["© Donald L Carey"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/534","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["William Van Cleave"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Carey, Donald L"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Defense and Strategic Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Defense and Security Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© Donald L Carey"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/534"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This analysis will detail the American experience in strategic arms control as it has been conducted in the post-World War II strategic environment. No single political enterprise has so involved the large powers or lent itself to the degree of public debate that has been generated by arms control. It has often, perhaps too often, been the case that the measure of the bilateral great power relationship has been taken on the basis of strategic arms control. Due to its portents for the world order, any process so dominating this political relationship warrants special consideration. Broken into four historical periods: the \"disarmament era,\" the \"modern era,\", the \"SALT era,\" and the \"Raegan/Bush era,\" strategic arms control will here be discussed and analyzed based on several criteria. Its history and evolution, the impact it has had on U.S. forces and force planning, its impact on strategic stability and the relative balance of power, and whether or not the various forays into arms control meet the requirements, singly or in toto, of \"good\" arms control will all be discussed here."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Survey of Strategic Arms Control"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["William Van Cleave"],"dc:creator":["Carey, Donald L"],"dc:description.abstract":["This analysis will detail the American experience in strategic arms control as it has been conducted in the post-World War II strategic environment. No single political enterprise has so involved the large powers or lent itself to the degree of public debate that has been generated by arms control. It has often, perhaps too often, been the case that the measure of the bilateral great power relationship has been taken on the basis of strategic arms control. Due to its portents for the world order, any process so dominating this political relationship warrants special consideration. Broken into four historical periods: the \"disarmament era,\" the \"modern era,\", the \"SALT era,\" and the \"Raegan/Bush era,\" strategic arms control will here be discussed and analyzed based on several criteria. Its history and evolution, the impact it has had on U.S. forces and force planning, its impact on strategic stability and the relative balance of power, and whether or not the various forays into arms control meet the requirements, singly or in toto, of \"good\" arms control will all be discussed here."],"dc:identifier":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/534"],"dc:rights":["© Donald L Carey"],"dc:subject":["Defense and Security Studies"],"dc:title":["A Survey of Strategic Arms Control"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Defense and Strategic Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:15:35Z"}