{"id":{"repo_id":"mo-state","oai_identifier":"oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1306"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mo-state/oai:bearworks.missouristate.edu:theses-1306","repository":{"repo_id":"mo-state","name":"Missouri State University","base_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Advocates For the People & the Test Ban","abstract":"For over forty years, the issues and questions surrounding a comprehensive nuclear test ban have remained generally the same. Of these concerns, nine U.S. Administrations have debated the national security implications of one issue in particular: verifying a nuclear test ban. From 1981 to 1986, the scientific community witnessed a renaissance of political activism that would influence the national public debate for years to come. This thesis examines the events leading up to the Reykjavik Summit and the unorthodox methods used by one organization to influence the administration's nuclear weapons testing policy. The political impact of this particular group, referred to as the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC), remains the subject of debate. Despite their anonymity, this private group played a significant part in the arms control debate during this period. Following the \"Reagan/Bush Era\" the future of nuclear testing was questionable. This thesis suggests that NRDC's role proved to be a significant factor in the arms control debate of the 1980s.","abstract_html":"For over forty years, the issues and questions surrounding a comprehensive nuclear test ban have remained generally the same. Of these concerns, nine U.S. Administrations have debated the national security implications of one issue in particular: verifying a nuclear test ban. From 1981 to 1986, the scientific community witnessed a renaissance of political activism that would influence the national public debate for years to come. This thesis examines the events leading up to the Reykjavik Summit and the unorthodox methods used by one organization to influence the administration's nuclear weapons testing policy. The political impact of this particular group, referred to as the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC), remains the subject of debate. Despite their anonymity, this private group played a significant part in the arms control debate during this period. Following the "Reagan/Bush Era" the future of nuclear testing was questionable. This thesis suggests that NRDC's role proved to be a significant factor in the arms control debate of the 1980s.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["O'Toole, Austin W."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Defense and Strategic Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Jack Crouch"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1994,"date_issued":"1994-12-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1994-12-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:15:23Z","subjects":["Defense and Security Studies"],"languages":[],"rights":["© Austin W O'Toole"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/305","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Jack Crouch"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["O'Toole, Austin W."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Defense and Strategic Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Defense and Security Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© Austin W O'Toole"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/305"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["For over forty years, the issues and questions surrounding a comprehensive nuclear test ban have remained generally the same. Of these concerns, nine U.S. Administrations have debated the national security implications of one issue in particular: verifying a nuclear test ban. From 1981 to 1986, the scientific community witnessed a renaissance of political activism that would influence the national public debate for years to come. This thesis examines the events leading up to the Reykjavik Summit and the unorthodox methods used by one organization to influence the administration's nuclear weapons testing policy. The political impact of this particular group, referred to as the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC), remains the subject of debate. Despite their anonymity, this private group played a significant part in the arms control debate during this period. Following the \"Reagan/Bush Era\" the future of nuclear testing was questionable. This thesis suggests that NRDC's role proved to be a significant factor in the arms control debate of the 1980s."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Advocates For the People & the Test Ban"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Jack Crouch"],"dc:creator":["O'Toole, Austin W."],"dc:description.abstract":["For over forty years, the issues and questions surrounding a comprehensive nuclear test ban have remained generally the same. Of these concerns, nine U.S. Administrations have debated the national security implications of one issue in particular: verifying a nuclear test ban. From 1981 to 1986, the scientific community witnessed a renaissance of political activism that would influence the national public debate for years to come. This thesis examines the events leading up to the Reykjavik Summit and the unorthodox methods used by one organization to influence the administration's nuclear weapons testing policy. The political impact of this particular group, referred to as the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC), remains the subject of debate. Despite their anonymity, this private group played a significant part in the arms control debate during this period. Following the \"Reagan/Bush Era\" the future of nuclear testing was questionable. This thesis suggests that NRDC's role proved to be a significant factor in the arms control debate of the 1980s."],"dc:identifier":["https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/305"],"dc:rights":["© Austin W O'Toole"],"dc:subject":["Defense and Security Studies"],"dc:title":["Advocates For the People & the Test Ban"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Defense and Strategic Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science in Defense and Strategic Studies"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T03:15:23Z"}