{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90197"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90197","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The gift of good, vacant land : urban agriculture and redevelopment in the city of Baltimore","abstract":"Urban agriculture in US cities has historically been treated as an interim land use, deemed only appropriate when real estate markets do not support the development of vacant land. However, urban agriculture in the 21st century has emerged in an era when cities have begun to embrace sustainability as a guiding principle, creating a window of opportunity for urban agriculture to become a more permanent aspect of city life. Additionally, this era of urban agriculture has also seen the emergence of commercial urban farms that seek to engage local economies in a way not seen in prior iterations of the practice. This has allowed urban agriculture an entry into the realm of economic development, perhaps the most significant driver of city growth. Because of these two factors, cities have begun incorporating urban agriculture into their land use planning efforts. However, many still treat it as a temporary land use. This is the case in Baltimore City, where two programs have sought to encourage urban agriculture as a temporary use on city-owned land: Adopt-A-Lot and the Homegrown Baltimore Land Lease Initiative. These programs have supported a blossoming of new farms and gardens, which has in turn led to the articulation of three types of urban farm: commercial farms, community farms, and demonstration farms. All types contribute to sustainable development in different ways, but by limiting the land tenure offered through these programs to short term leases and license agreements, the city is hobbling their ability to be truly sustainable, economically, environmentally, or socially. The city is doing this out of a bias towards traditional development over sustainable development. In this essay, I argue that treating urban agriculture as a permanent land use is the only way to make it an effective tool for sustainable development. In order to do this, the city of Baltimore needs to zone for urban agriculture, increase opportunities for farms in city parks, and establish processes for transferring ownership of vacant land from the city to urban farms.","abstract_html":"Urban agriculture in US cities has historically been treated as an interim land use, deemed only appropriate when real estate markets do not support the development of vacant land. However, urban agriculture in the 21st century has emerged in an era when cities have begun to embrace sustainability as a guiding principle, creating a window of opportunity for urban agriculture to become a more permanent aspect of city life. Additionally, this era of urban agriculture has also seen the emergence of commercial urban farms that seek to engage local economies in a way not seen in prior iterations of the practice. This has allowed urban agriculture an entry into the realm of economic development, perhaps the most significant driver of city growth. Because of these two factors, cities have begun incorporating urban agriculture into their land use planning efforts. However, many still treat it as a temporary land use. This is the case in Baltimore City, where two programs have sought to encourage urban agriculture as a temporary use on city-owned land: Adopt-A-Lot and the Homegrown Baltimore Land Lease Initiative. These programs have supported a blossoming of new farms and gardens, which has in turn led to the articulation of three types of urban farm: commercial farms, community farms, and demonstration farms. All types contribute to sustainable development in different ways, but by limiting the land tenure offered through these programs to short term leases and license agreements, the city is hobbling their ability to be truly sustainable, economically, environmentally, or socially. The city is doing this out of a bias towards traditional development over sustainable development. In this essay, I argue that treating urban agriculture as a permanent land use is the only way to make it an effective tool for sustainable development. In order to do this, the city of Baltimore needs to zone for urban agriculture, increase opportunities for farms in city parks, and establish processes for transferring ownership of vacant land from the city to urban farms.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cook, Andrew (Andrew John)"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Judith A. Layzer."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014","date_published":"2014","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:24Z","subjects":["Urban Studies and Planning."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90197","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Judith A. Layzer."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cook, Andrew (Andrew John)"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-09-19T21:45:27Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-09-19T21:45:27Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Urban Studies and Planning."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90197"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2014.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 53-56)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Urban agriculture in US cities has historically been treated as an interim land use, deemed only appropriate when real estate markets do not support the development of vacant land. However, urban agriculture in the 21st century has emerged in an era when cities have begun to embrace sustainability as a guiding principle, creating a window of opportunity for urban agriculture to become a more permanent aspect of city life. Additionally, this era of urban agriculture has also seen the emergence of commercial urban farms that seek to engage local economies in a way not seen in prior iterations of the practice. This has allowed urban agriculture an entry into the realm of economic development, perhaps the most significant driver of city growth. Because of these two factors, cities have begun incorporating urban agriculture into their land use planning efforts. However, many still treat it as a temporary land use. This is the case in Baltimore City, where two programs have sought to encourage urban agriculture as a temporary use on city-owned land: Adopt-A-Lot and the Homegrown Baltimore Land Lease Initiative. These programs have supported a blossoming of new farms and gardens, which has in turn led to the articulation of three types of urban farm: commercial farms, community farms, and demonstration farms. All types contribute to sustainable development in different ways, but by limiting the land tenure offered through these programs to short term leases and license agreements, the city is hobbling their ability to be truly sustainable, economically, environmentally, or socially. The city is doing this out of a bias towards traditional development over sustainable development. In this essay, I argue that treating urban agriculture as a permanent land use is the only way to make it an effective tool for sustainable development. In order to do this, the city of Baltimore needs to zone for urban agriculture, increase opportunities for farms in city parks, and establish processes for transferring ownership of vacant land from the city to urban farms."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["M.C.P."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The gift of good, vacant land : urban agriculture and redevelopment in the city of Baltimore"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Judith A. Layzer."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning."],"dc:contributor.other":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning."],"dc:creator":["Cook, Andrew (Andrew John)"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-09-19T21:45:27Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-09-19T21:45:27Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014"],"dc:description":["Thesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2014.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 53-56)."],"dc:description.abstract":["Urban agriculture in US cities has historically been treated as an interim land use, deemed only appropriate when real estate markets do not support the development of vacant land. However, urban agriculture in the 21st century has emerged in an era when cities have begun to embrace sustainability as a guiding principle, creating a window of opportunity for urban agriculture to become a more permanent aspect of city life. Additionally, this era of urban agriculture has also seen the emergence of commercial urban farms that seek to engage local economies in a way not seen in prior iterations of the practice. This has allowed urban agriculture an entry into the realm of economic development, perhaps the most significant driver of city growth. Because of these two factors, cities have begun incorporating urban agriculture into their land use planning efforts. However, many still treat it as a temporary land use. This is the case in Baltimore City, where two programs have sought to encourage urban agriculture as a temporary use on city-owned land: Adopt-A-Lot and the Homegrown Baltimore Land Lease Initiative. These programs have supported a blossoming of new farms and gardens, which has in turn led to the articulation of three types of urban farm: commercial farms, community farms, and demonstration farms. All types contribute to sustainable development in different ways, but by limiting the land tenure offered through these programs to short term leases and license agreements, the city is hobbling their ability to be truly sustainable, economically, environmentally, or socially. The city is doing this out of a bias towards traditional development over sustainable development. In this essay, I argue that treating urban agriculture as a permanent land use is the only way to make it an effective tool for sustainable development. In order to do this, the city of Baltimore needs to zone for urban agriculture, increase opportunities for farms in city parks, and establish processes for transferring ownership of vacant land from the city to urban farms."],"dc:description.degree":["M.C.P."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90197"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Urban Studies and Planning."],"dc:title":["The gift of good, vacant land : urban agriculture and redevelopment in the city of Baltimore"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:24Z"}