{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90079"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90079","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"What difference does a robot make? managing ambiguity in distributed knowledge work","abstract":"What difference does robotic telepresence make to the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work? We examined this question in a post-surgical intensive care where remote medical workers struggled to coordinate their work in the face of ambiguities related to their extremely sick patients. Our in-depth field study allowed us to explore how differently ambiguity was managed when night rounds were performed through robotic telepresence, allowing distributed medical workers to be virtually co-present at the site of work. In contrast to the literature, which suggests that co-located, face-to-face interaction should reduce ambiguity and facilitate coordination, we found that ambiguities were both reduced and intensified with robotic telepresence, resulting in contradictory implications for coordination. We found that these differences in the management of ambiguity and coordination were crucially related to how the distributed work and commitment to that work were materially enacted in practice. After discussing our findings, we explore their significance and contributions to research on the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work.","abstract_html":"What difference does robotic telepresence make to the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work? We examined this question in a post-surgical intensive care where remote medical workers struggled to coordinate their work in the face of ambiguities related to their extremely sick patients. Our in-depth field study allowed us to explore how differently ambiguity was managed when night rounds were performed through robotic telepresence, allowing distributed medical workers to be virtually co-present at the site of work. In contrast to the literature, which suggests that co-located, face-to-face interaction should reduce ambiguity and facilitate coordination, we found that ambiguities were both reduced and intensified with robotic telepresence, resulting in contradictory implications for coordination. We found that these differences in the management of ambiguity and coordination were crucially related to how the distributed work and commitment to that work were materially enacted in practice. After discussing our findings, we explore their significance and contributions to research on the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Beane, Matthew I. (Matthew Ian)","Orlikowski, Wanda J"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Sloan School of Management.","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Wanda Orlikowski."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014","date_published":"2014","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:51Z","subjects":["Sloan School of Management."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90079","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Wanda Orlikowski."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Sloan School of Management."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Sloan School of Management."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Beane, Matthew I. (Matthew Ian)","Orlikowski, Wanda J"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-09-19T21:38:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-09-19T21:38:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Sloan School of Management."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90079"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2014.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 30-32)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["What difference does robotic telepresence make to the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work? We examined this question in a post-surgical intensive care where remote medical workers struggled to coordinate their work in the face of ambiguities related to their extremely sick patients. Our in-depth field study allowed us to explore how differently ambiguity was managed when night rounds were performed through robotic telepresence, allowing distributed medical workers to be virtually co-present at the site of work. In contrast to the literature, which suggests that co-located, face-to-face interaction should reduce ambiguity and facilitate coordination, we found that ambiguities were both reduced and intensified with robotic telepresence, resulting in contradictory implications for coordination. We found that these differences in the management of ambiguity and coordination were crucially related to how the distributed work and commitment to that work were materially enacted in practice. After discussing our findings, we explore their significance and contributions to research on the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["S.M. in Management Research"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["What difference does a robot make? managing ambiguity in distributed knowledge work"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Wanda Orlikowski."],"dc:contributor.department":["Sloan School of Management."],"dc:contributor.other":["Sloan School of Management."],"dc:creator":["Beane, Matthew I. (Matthew Ian)","Orlikowski, Wanda J"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-09-19T21:38:29Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-09-19T21:38:29Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014"],"dc:description":["Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2014.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 30-32)."],"dc:description.abstract":["What difference does robotic telepresence make to the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work? We examined this question in a post-surgical intensive care where remote medical workers struggled to coordinate their work in the face of ambiguities related to their extremely sick patients. Our in-depth field study allowed us to explore how differently ambiguity was managed when night rounds were performed through robotic telepresence, allowing distributed medical workers to be virtually co-present at the site of work. In contrast to the literature, which suggests that co-located, face-to-face interaction should reduce ambiguity and facilitate coordination, we found that ambiguities were both reduced and intensified with robotic telepresence, resulting in contradictory implications for coordination. We found that these differences in the management of ambiguity and coordination were crucially related to how the distributed work and commitment to that work were materially enacted in practice. After discussing our findings, we explore their significance and contributions to research on the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work."],"dc:description.degree":["S.M. in Management Research"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90079"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Sloan School of Management."],"dc:title":["What difference does a robot make? managing ambiguity in distributed knowledge work"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:51Z"}