{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/85509"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/85509","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Graduate admissions at MIT & comparison-based rank aggregation : a case study","abstract":"Admission to the Graduate program in EECS at MIT is done via an all-electronic system. Applicants submit materials through a web interface and faculty \"reviewers\" read the applications and make notes via a different interface. Among other comments, reviewers provide a numerical score between 1 and 4 to each application. Admissions decisions are reached via a lengthy process involving discussion among faculty, which is often guided by the numerical scores of the applications. Past data show the scores of the applicants still under consideration during the final stages of the process are almost all 4's. Because of this uniformity, the scores do not provide much resolution into the differences in quality of the applications, and are therefore not as helpful as they could be in guiding admissions decisions. In this work, we present the use of an additional scoring system that is based on pairwise comparisons between applicants made by faculty reviewers. We present the design we created for this scheme and the code written to implement it, and analyze the data we obtained when the code went live during the 2012-2013 admissions cycle.","abstract_html":"Admission to the Graduate program in EECS at MIT is done via an all-electronic system. Applicants submit materials through a web interface and faculty "reviewers" read the applications and make notes via a different interface. Among other comments, reviewers provide a numerical score between 1 and 4 to each application. Admissions decisions are reached via a lengthy process involving discussion among faculty, which is often guided by the numerical scores of the applications. Past data show the scores of the applicants still under consideration during the final stages of the process are almost all 4's. Because of this uniformity, the scores do not provide much resolution into the differences in quality of the applications, and are therefore not as helpful as they could be in guiding admissions decisions. In this work, we present the use of an additional scoring system that is based on pairwise comparisons between applicants made by faculty reviewers. We present the design we created for this scheme and the code written to implement it, and analyze the data we obtained when the code went live during the 2012-2013 admissions cycle.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Szeto, Katherine Carbognin"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Devavrat Shah, Gregory Wornell and Frans Kaashoek."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013","date_published":"2013","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:49Z","subjects":["Electrical Engineering and Computer Science."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85509","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Devavrat Shah, Gregory Wornell and Frans Kaashoek."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Szeto, Katherine Carbognin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-06T15:47:08Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-06T15:47:08Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Electrical Engineering and Computer Science."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85509"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis: M. Eng., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2013.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 43-44)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Admission to the Graduate program in EECS at MIT is done via an all-electronic system. Applicants submit materials through a web interface and faculty \"reviewers\" read the applications and make notes via a different interface. Among other comments, reviewers provide a numerical score between 1 and 4 to each application. Admissions decisions are reached via a lengthy process involving discussion among faculty, which is often guided by the numerical scores of the applications. Past data show the scores of the applicants still under consideration during the final stages of the process are almost all 4's. Because of this uniformity, the scores do not provide much resolution into the differences in quality of the applications, and are therefore not as helpful as they could be in guiding admissions decisions. In this work, we present the use of an additional scoring system that is based on pairwise comparisons between applicants made by faculty reviewers. We present the design we created for this scheme and the code written to implement it, and analyze the data we obtained when the code went live during the 2012-2013 admissions cycle."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["M. Eng."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Graduate admissions at MIT & comparison-based rank aggregation : a case study"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Devavrat Shah, Gregory Wornell and Frans Kaashoek."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science."],"dc:contributor.other":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science."],"dc:creator":["Szeto, Katherine Carbognin"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-06T15:47:08Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-06T15:47:08Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013"],"dc:description":["Thesis: M. Eng., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2013.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (pages 43-44)."],"dc:description.abstract":["Admission to the Graduate program in EECS at MIT is done via an all-electronic system. Applicants submit materials through a web interface and faculty \"reviewers\" read the applications and make notes via a different interface. Among other comments, reviewers provide a numerical score between 1 and 4 to each application. Admissions decisions are reached via a lengthy process involving discussion among faculty, which is often guided by the numerical scores of the applications. Past data show the scores of the applicants still under consideration during the final stages of the process are almost all 4's. Because of this uniformity, the scores do not provide much resolution into the differences in quality of the applications, and are therefore not as helpful as they could be in guiding admissions decisions. In this work, we present the use of an additional scoring system that is based on pairwise comparisons between applicants made by faculty reviewers. We present the design we created for this scheme and the code written to implement it, and analyze the data we obtained when the code went live during the 2012-2013 admissions cycle."],"dc:description.degree":["M. Eng."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85509"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Electrical Engineering and Computer Science."],"dc:title":["Graduate admissions at MIT & comparison-based rank aggregation : a case study"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:49Z"}