Back to results

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning to collaborate : lessons from the design studio

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This thesis examines the dynamics of collaboration within the architectural design studio by focusing on the basic elements of group interaction (Commitment, Conflict, Communication, the Collaborative Process and the Role of the Critic), as they apply to both the process and products of collaborative design. The theoretical discussion is supported with data collected from observations of two 'collaborative' studios organized by the School of Architecture and Planning at MIT. Effective collaborative skills are considered to be an important issue for practicing architects, yet these skills are often overlooked in the studio. This thesis proposes an educational pedagogy that balances the teaching of collaborative skills with the teaching of traditional design skills.

Degree

thesis:*
Department dc:contributor.department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture
Grantor dc:publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Year dc:date.issued
1997

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Crudden, Jane M. (Jane Marie)
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • William L. Porter.

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65462
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/65462

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
MIT
Base URL
dspace.mit.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Crudden, Jane M. (Jane Marie). Learning to collaborate : lessons from the design studio. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65462