{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/63239"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/63239","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Advancing TOD in Boston's suburbs : advantages and obstacles in the entitlement process","abstract":"This thesis is an inquiry into the feasibility of creating new compact, mixed-use transit-oriented development (TOD) within existing suburbs. I have focused on the entitlement phase of projects, during which land is rezoned, permits are granted and development agreements are struck. Municipalities and developers must work together during this process, and I sought to understand the issues from both sides. For TOD's in Boston's suburbs that have successfully made it through the entitlement phase, what were the most pivotal issues? Pivotal factors can be positive or negative, and either help advance the project or create sticking points. In the case of problematic issues, how were they resolved? To answer these questions, this thesis investigates three case studies: Station Landing in Medford, the Hingham Shipyard in Hingham and Westwood Station in Medford. All three cases had some pivotal issues in common, although resolution varied among cases. Political will, prior zoning and planning done by the municipality, traffic and schools were important factors in every case. Recommendations to planners and developers are as follows: - It's important for both planners and developers to understand the \"other side.\" Working groups are an innovative way to vet issues. - TOD is not for the faint of heart. Projects require vision, leadership and political will. - Experience (especially with similar past projects) matters. - Clear language in the zoning bylaw is crucial. - Predictable mitigation is best. - Planners and developers should look for ways to phase projects and create opportunities for smaller developments. - Transit may not be a necessary ingredient. Flexibility in thinking about TOD and smart growth is vital. Interestingly, while the thesis focuses on TOD, I found that transit was not a critical component for any of the three cases. Therefore, I believe that the findings of this thesis are more broadly applicable to many forms of compact, mixed-use infill development within the suburbs.","abstract_html":"This thesis is an inquiry into the feasibility of creating new compact, mixed-use transit-oriented development (TOD) within existing suburbs. I have focused on the entitlement phase of projects, during which land is rezoned, permits are granted and development agreements are struck. Municipalities and developers must work together during this process, and I sought to understand the issues from both sides. For TOD's in Boston's suburbs that have successfully made it through the entitlement phase, what were the most pivotal issues? Pivotal factors can be positive or negative, and either help advance the project or create sticking points. In the case of problematic issues, how were they resolved? To answer these questions, this thesis investigates three case studies: Station Landing in Medford, the Hingham Shipyard in Hingham and Westwood Station in Medford. All three cases had some pivotal issues in common, although resolution varied among cases. Political will, prior zoning and planning done by the municipality, traffic and schools were important factors in every case. Recommendations to planners and developers are as follows: - It's important for both planners and developers to understand the "other side." Working groups are an innovative way to vet issues. - TOD is not for the faint of heart. Projects require vision, leadership and political will. - Experience (especially with similar past projects) matters. - Clear language in the zoning bylaw is crucial. - Predictable mitigation is best. - Planners and developers should look for ways to phase projects and create opportunities for smaller developments. - Transit may not be a necessary ingredient. Flexibility in thinking about TOD and smart growth is vital. Interestingly, while the thesis focuses on TOD, I found that transit was not a critical component for any of the three cases. Therefore, I believe that the findings of this thesis are more broadly applicable to many forms of compact, mixed-use infill development within the suburbs.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Simonson, Kristin (Kristin Andrea)"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Adjunct Professor Terry Szold."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011","date_published":"2011","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:52Z","subjects":["Urban Studies and Planning.","Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/63239","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Adjunct Professor Terry Szold."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.","Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Simonson, Kristin (Kristin Andrea)"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2011-06-06T17:45:36Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-06-06T17:45:36Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2011"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Urban Studies and Planning.","Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/63239"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning; and, (S.M. in Real Estate Development)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate, 2011.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (p. 121-128)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis is an inquiry into the feasibility of creating new compact, mixed-use transit-oriented development (TOD) within existing suburbs. I have focused on the entitlement phase of projects, during which land is rezoned, permits are granted and development agreements are struck. Municipalities and developers must work together during this process, and I sought to understand the issues from both sides. For TOD's in Boston's suburbs that have successfully made it through the entitlement phase, what were the most pivotal issues? Pivotal factors can be positive or negative, and either help advance the project or create sticking points. In the case of problematic issues, how were they resolved? To answer these questions, this thesis investigates three case studies: Station Landing in Medford, the Hingham Shipyard in Hingham and Westwood Station in Medford. All three cases had some pivotal issues in common, although resolution varied among cases. Political will, prior zoning and planning done by the municipality, traffic and schools were important factors in every case. Recommendations to planners and developers are as follows: - It's important for both planners and developers to understand the \"other side.\" Working groups are an innovative way to vet issues. - TOD is not for the faint of heart. Projects require vision, leadership and political will. - Experience (especially with similar past projects) matters. - Clear language in the zoning bylaw is crucial. - Predictable mitigation is best. - Planners and developers should look for ways to phase projects and create opportunities for smaller developments. - Transit may not be a necessary ingredient. Flexibility in thinking about TOD and smart growth is vital. Interestingly, while the thesis focuses on TOD, I found that transit was not a critical component for any of the three cases. Therefore, I believe that the findings of this thesis are more broadly applicable to many forms of compact, mixed-use infill development within the suburbs."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["S.M.in Real Estate Development","M.C.P."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Advancing TOD in Boston's suburbs : advantages and obstacles in the entitlement process"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Adjunct Professor Terry Szold."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.","Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development."],"dc:contributor.other":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development."],"dc:creator":["Simonson, Kristin (Kristin Andrea)"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2011-06-06T17:45:36Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-06-06T17:45:36Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2011"],"dc:description":["Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning; and, (S.M. in Real Estate Development)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate, 2011.","Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.","Includes bibliographical references (p. 121-128)."],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis is an inquiry into the feasibility of creating new compact, mixed-use transit-oriented development (TOD) within existing suburbs. I have focused on the entitlement phase of projects, during which land is rezoned, permits are granted and development agreements are struck. Municipalities and developers must work together during this process, and I sought to understand the issues from both sides. For TOD's in Boston's suburbs that have successfully made it through the entitlement phase, what were the most pivotal issues? Pivotal factors can be positive or negative, and either help advance the project or create sticking points. In the case of problematic issues, how were they resolved? To answer these questions, this thesis investigates three case studies: Station Landing in Medford, the Hingham Shipyard in Hingham and Westwood Station in Medford. All three cases had some pivotal issues in common, although resolution varied among cases. Political will, prior zoning and planning done by the municipality, traffic and schools were important factors in every case. Recommendations to planners and developers are as follows: - It's important for both planners and developers to understand the \"other side.\" Working groups are an innovative way to vet issues. - TOD is not for the faint of heart. Projects require vision, leadership and political will. - Experience (especially with similar past projects) matters. - Clear language in the zoning bylaw is crucial. - Predictable mitigation is best. - Planners and developers should look for ways to phase projects and create opportunities for smaller developments. - Transit may not be a necessary ingredient. Flexibility in thinking about TOD and smart growth is vital. Interestingly, while the thesis focuses on TOD, I found that transit was not a critical component for any of the three cases. Therefore, I believe that the findings of this thesis are more broadly applicable to many forms of compact, mixed-use infill development within the suburbs."],"dc:description.degree":["S.M.in Real Estate Development","M.C.P."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/63239"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Urban Studies and Planning.","Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development."],"dc:title":["Advancing TOD in Boston's suburbs : advantages and obstacles in the entitlement process"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:52Z"}