Back to results

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Visualizing subjective decision criteria for system evaluation

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The tools and methods used to evaluate complex systems in terms of human systems integration (HSI) include software, hardware, models, simulations, processes, and techniques. Hundreds of such tools currently exist to evaluate complex HSI systems, and the number is continuously growing. Many HSI tools are developed in research settings, or in an ad-hoc fashion to meet specific project goals. As such, there is no standard repository of HSI tools. Additionally, as HSI systems become more complex and the number of HSI dimensions in which decision-makers evaluate systems continues to grow, the HSI cost-benefit trade space that explores the costs and benefits of a system on the HSI dimensions expands. Therefore, it becomes more difficult for decision-makers to determine if and to what degree a system meets their specific HSI criteria. Engineers, managers, and other decision-makers often have to evaluate complex HSI systems, such as the case of acquisitions in which decision-makers need to rate and compare particular systems. Since there are hundreds of tools that currently exist to evaluate the HSI aspects of systems, decision-makers may not be familiar with all of them. Additionally, with the HSI cost-benefit trade space continually expanding, decision-makers need a way to reduce the number of HSI tools, or downs elect, from the hundreds of HSI tools to a smaller set of desirable tools. This smaller set of desirable tools is defined by users' criteria, which is often vague and ambiguous. This research investigates the visualization techniques of such downselection tools and how the visual representation of information impacts the decisions of decision-makers. The results of this work show that salient information biases decision-makers' decisions when using decision support tools (DSTs). Also, information aggregation did not appear to have an effect on decision-makers' level of automation bias when using decision support tools. There did not appear to be any correlation between decision-makers' trust in DSTs and the extent to which they rely on the results presented in those tools. Additionally, decision-makers' perception of the ease of use of DSTs is correlated with their trust in those tools, although there appeared to be an influence of age on users' perceptions of such tools. While this thesis focuses on the specific example of downselecting a database of HSI tools for a decision maker, the overall processes and research in this effort can generally be applied to any downselection from a large database of elements to a smaller set of desirable elements using both objective and subjective decision criteria of decision-makers.

Degree

thesis:*
Department dc:contributor.department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
Grantor dc:publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Year dc:date.issued
2010

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Coley, Jodyann Felicia
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Mary L. Cummings.

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61156
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/61156

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
MIT
Base URL
dspace.mit.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Coley, Jodyann Felicia. Visualizing subjective decision criteria for system evaluation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61156