Product-level Bill of Material Development Methodology : process implementation

Cisco Systems maintains its leading position in the IP network equipment market through continual innovation and release of new products. In order to manage these new product introductions, the Product Operations group enables the development engine by standardizing and refining operations processes. The Bill of Materials Development Methodology (BOM DM) is a new process created to reduce BOM structuring errors and lead to an improved fulfillment experience for Cisco customers. In keeping with the Six Sigma philosophy, the BOM DM implementation team used the Define-Measure-Analyze-Implement-Control (DMAIC) approach to manage this process but struggled to find the supporting data to appropriately measure critical process parameters or quantify the impact of the solution. After re-evaluation, the approach was modified to maintain the Six Sigma mindset but abandon much of the rigor of DMAIC such that the implementation could be completed within the required timeframe and available resources. This required a new process improvement strategy that would educate the New Product Introduction (NPI) teams on the downstream consequences of their actions so that they would buy in to the need for a standardized best practice. The BOM DM was incorporated into the product development standards and each functional group was given the option to adopt. Six months later the project was reviewed to understand its effect on the company. This thesis serves as a case study of the issues faced on many DMAIC implementations in the real world that experience less than perfect execution. Though sacrificing the confidence that is supported by statistically significant measurement and analysis, the revised approach utilized for the BOM DM implementation leveraged two of Cisco's prized endowments: speed and a creative entrepreneurial spirit. The goal of this thesis is to uncover the tradeoffs of such a compromise and empower managers to decide how best to engage in future process improvements.

Department dc:contributor.department

Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT

Grantor dc:publisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Year dc:date.issued

2010

Author dc:creator

• Black, James William

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Christopher L. Magee and Sara L. Beckman.

• Sloan School of Management.
• Engineering Systems Division.
• Leaders for Global Operations Program.

Statement dc:rights

• M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.

Licence dc:rights.uri

• http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582

Language dc:language.iso

eng

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59153

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/59153