{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/33271"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/33271","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"CIAM and the emergence of Team 10 thinking, 1945-1959","abstract":"This study is an intellectual micro-history which examines the debates about the future of modern architecture and planning that occurred within CIAM (Congès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne) between 1945-1959. This investigation traces the emergence of a new set of values for modern architecture as they were expressed by a group of its younger members that became known, in 1954, as Team 10. Set within the context of CIAM before World War II, the intellectual context during the war, and the radically new social and political context of Europe after the war, this inquiry pays particular attention to the period between 1954-1956, an intense period for the young Dutch and English CIAM members in developing the theoretical position that would lead to the dissolution of CIAM as an institution, form the basis of their work in Team 10's better-known period of the 1960s and 1970s, and change the terms of debate for architectural practice ever since. This inquiry contributes to the neglected area of architecture inquiry that examines theories of production. It is founded on the premise that all design production is based on a theory, implicitly held or explicitly stated, and these theories are not necessarily consistent with architectural production. From this methodological position I argue that the importance of Team 10 lies less in their role as insurgents who dismantled the institution of CIAM, than as contributors, for the discipline of architecture, to a cultural critique of Modernism occurring in postwar society in general.","abstract_html":"This study is an intellectual micro-history which examines the debates about the future of modern architecture and planning that occurred within CIAM (Congès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne) between 1945-1959. This investigation traces the emergence of a new set of values for modern architecture as they were expressed by a group of its younger members that became known, in 1954, as Team 10. Set within the context of CIAM before World War II, the intellectual context during the war, and the radically new social and political context of Europe after the war, this inquiry pays particular attention to the period between 1954-1956, an intense period for the young Dutch and English CIAM members in developing the theoretical position that would lead to the dissolution of CIAM as an institution, form the basis of their work in Team 10's better-known period of the 1960s and 1970s, and change the terms of debate for architectural practice ever since. This inquiry contributes to the neglected area of architecture inquiry that examines theories of production. It is founded on the premise that all design production is based on a theory, implicitly held or explicitly stated, and these theories are not necessarily consistent with architectural production. From this methodological position I argue that the importance of Team 10 lies less in their role as insurgents who dismantled the institution of CIAM, than as contributors, for the discipline of architecture, to a cultural critique of Modernism occurring in postwar society in general.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pedret, Annie"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Mark Jarzombek."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2001,"date_issued":"2001","date_published":"2001","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:13Z","subjects":["Architecture."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33271","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Mark Jarzombek."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pedret, Annie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2006-07-13T15:11:11Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2006-07-13T15:11:11Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2001"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Architecture."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33271"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2001.","Includes bibliographical references (p. 247-271)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study is an intellectual micro-history which examines the debates about the future of modern architecture and planning that occurred within CIAM (Congès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne) between 1945-1959. This investigation traces the emergence of a new set of values for modern architecture as they were expressed by a group of its younger members that became known, in 1954, as Team 10. Set within the context of CIAM before World War II, the intellectual context during the war, and the radically new social and political context of Europe after the war, this inquiry pays particular attention to the period between 1954-1956, an intense period for the young Dutch and English CIAM members in developing the theoretical position that would lead to the dissolution of CIAM as an institution, form the basis of their work in Team 10's better-known period of the 1960s and 1970s, and change the terms of debate for architectural practice ever since. This inquiry contributes to the neglected area of architecture inquiry that examines theories of production. It is founded on the premise that all design production is based on a theory, implicitly held or explicitly stated, and these theories are not necessarily consistent with architectural production. From this methodological position I argue that the importance of Team 10 lies less in their role as insurgents who dismantled the institution of CIAM, than as contributors, for the discipline of architecture, to a cultural critique of Modernism occurring in postwar society in general.","(cont.) This study contributes to on going studies on the development of modernist practices by proposing a critical role for Team 10 in the shift from formal Modernism to critical Postmodernism, and provides a case study for how important intellectual shifts occur."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["CIAM and the emergence of Team 10 thinking, 1945-1959"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Mark Jarzombek."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture."],"dc:contributor.other":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture."],"dc:creator":["Pedret, Annie"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2006-07-13T15:11:11Z"],"dc:date.available":["2006-07-13T15:11:11Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2001"],"dc:description":["Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2001.","Includes bibliographical references (p. 247-271)."],"dc:description.abstract":["This study is an intellectual micro-history which examines the debates about the future of modern architecture and planning that occurred within CIAM (Congès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne) between 1945-1959. This investigation traces the emergence of a new set of values for modern architecture as they were expressed by a group of its younger members that became known, in 1954, as Team 10. Set within the context of CIAM before World War II, the intellectual context during the war, and the radically new social and political context of Europe after the war, this inquiry pays particular attention to the period between 1954-1956, an intense period for the young Dutch and English CIAM members in developing the theoretical position that would lead to the dissolution of CIAM as an institution, form the basis of their work in Team 10's better-known period of the 1960s and 1970s, and change the terms of debate for architectural practice ever since. This inquiry contributes to the neglected area of architecture inquiry that examines theories of production. It is founded on the premise that all design production is based on a theory, implicitly held or explicitly stated, and these theories are not necessarily consistent with architectural production. From this methodological position I argue that the importance of Team 10 lies less in their role as insurgents who dismantled the institution of CIAM, than as contributors, for the discipline of architecture, to a cultural critique of Modernism occurring in postwar society in general.","(cont.) This study contributes to on going studies on the development of modernist practices by proposing a critical role for Team 10 in the shift from formal Modernism to critical Postmodernism, and provides a case study for how important intellectual shifts occur."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph.D."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33271"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Architecture."],"dc:title":["CIAM and the emergence of Team 10 thinking, 1945-1959"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:13Z"}