{"id":{"repo_id":"mit","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/32724"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/mit/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/32724","repository":{"repo_id":"mit","name":"MIT","base_url":"https://dspace.mit.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"United States and France : a regulatory perspective","abstract":"Nuclear materials and their uses are regulated differently in countries around the world. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulates the different commercial and academic uses of nuclear technology, including nuclear power plants. In France, the Direction Generale de la Surete Nucleaire et de la Radioprotection (DGSNR) and the Electricite de France (EDF) control the nuclear industry, with the DGSNR controlling most of the regulation and the EDF presiding over the construction. In this thesis, the two systems of regulation will be reviewed and compared for efficiency and efficacy. Furthermore, those efficiencies will be examined for implications in the technical, social, and economic regimes. This thesis will review the histories and present-day structures of two different regulatory agencies, propose reasons for the difference, and argue the benefits and shortcomings of each. At first glance, the American regulatory system appears to be in the hands of the lawmakers and founded on a legal basis. The French system, however, emphasizes the scientists and engineers as the regulatory experts and is thus founded more on a scientific and technical foundation.","abstract_html":"Nuclear materials and their uses are regulated differently in countries around the world. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulates the different commercial and academic uses of nuclear technology, including nuclear power plants. In France, the Direction Generale de la Surete Nucleaire et de la Radioprotection (DGSNR) and the Electricite de France (EDF) control the nuclear industry, with the DGSNR controlling most of the regulation and the EDF presiding over the construction. In this thesis, the two systems of regulation will be reviewed and compared for efficiency and efficacy. Furthermore, those efficiencies will be examined for implications in the technical, social, and economic regimes. This thesis will review the histories and present-day structures of two different regulatory agencies, propose reasons for the difference, and argue the benefits and shortcomings of each. At first glance, the American regulatory system appears to be in the hands of the lawmakers and founded on a legal basis. The French system, however, emphasizes the scientists and engineers as the regulatory experts and is thus founded more on a scientific and technical foundation.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Aichele, Matthew D. (Matthew Donald), 1980-"],"institution":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Engineering","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Andrew C. Kadak."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004","date_published":"2004","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:24Z","subjects":["Nuclear Engineering."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32724","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Andrew C. Kadak."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Engineering","Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Nuclear Engineering."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Aichele, Matthew D. (Matthew Donald), 1980-"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2006-05-15T20:25:33Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2006-05-15T20:25:33Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2004"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Nuclear Engineering."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32724"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 2004.","Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-85)."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Nuclear materials and their uses are regulated differently in countries around the world. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulates the different commercial and academic uses of nuclear technology, including nuclear power plants. In France, the Direction Generale de la Surete Nucleaire et de la Radioprotection (DGSNR) and the Electricite de France (EDF) control the nuclear industry, with the DGSNR controlling most of the regulation and the EDF presiding over the construction. In this thesis, the two systems of regulation will be reviewed and compared for efficiency and efficacy. Furthermore, those efficiencies will be examined for implications in the technical, social, and economic regimes. This thesis will review the histories and present-day structures of two different regulatory agencies, propose reasons for the difference, and argue the benefits and shortcomings of each. At first glance, the American regulatory system appears to be in the hands of the lawmakers and founded on a legal basis. The French system, however, emphasizes the scientists and engineers as the regulatory experts and is thus founded more on a scientific and technical foundation."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["S.B."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["United States and France : a regulatory perspective"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Andrew C. Kadak."],"dc:contributor.department":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Engineering","Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering"],"dc:contributor.other":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Nuclear Engineering."],"dc:creator":["Aichele, Matthew D. (Matthew Donald), 1980-"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2006-05-15T20:25:33Z"],"dc:date.available":["2006-05-15T20:25:33Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2004"],"dc:description":["Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 2004.","Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-85)."],"dc:description.abstract":["Nuclear materials and their uses are regulated differently in countries around the world. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulates the different commercial and academic uses of nuclear technology, including nuclear power plants. In France, the Direction Generale de la Surete Nucleaire et de la Radioprotection (DGSNR) and the Electricite de France (EDF) control the nuclear industry, with the DGSNR controlling most of the regulation and the EDF presiding over the construction. In this thesis, the two systems of regulation will be reviewed and compared for efficiency and efficacy. Furthermore, those efficiencies will be examined for implications in the technical, social, and economic regimes. This thesis will review the histories and present-day structures of two different regulatory agencies, propose reasons for the difference, and argue the benefits and shortcomings of each. At first glance, the American regulatory system appears to be in the hands of the lawmakers and founded on a legal basis. The French system, however, emphasizes the scientists and engineers as the regulatory experts and is thus founded more on a scientific and technical foundation."],"dc:description.degree":["S.B."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32724"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"],"dc:rights":["M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582"],"dc:subject":["Nuclear Engineering."],"dc:title":["United States and France : a regulatory perspective"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:21:24Z"}